The manager of a sports arena wants to learn more about the financial status of the people who are attending an NBA basketball game. He would like to give a survey to a representative sample of the more than 20,000 fans in attendance. Ticket prices for the game vary a great deal: seats near the court cost over \(100 each, while seats in the top rows of the arena cost \)25 each. The arena is divided into 30 numbered sections, from 101 to 130 Each section has rows of seats labeled with letters from A (nearest the court) to ZZ (top row

of the arena).

Short Answer

Expert verified

The arena has been divided in to numbers from 101to 130

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Ticket prices for the game range from over $100 for tickets close to the court to $25 for seats in the top rows of the arena. The arena is divided into 30 sections, numbered 101 through 130

02

Concept

Divide the population into smaller groups before taking a cluster sample. These groups should ideally reflect the population's features. Then pick one of the clusters' SRS. The sample includes all individuals in the designated clusters.

03

Explanation

The greatest solution is to build strata with people who share similar characteristics. Because there is a similar distance between the lettered and the same ticket price, choosing the lettered row as the strata would be the best option. As a result, the optimal method is to choose letters with similar distances and prices.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Chocolate and happy babies A University of Helsinki (Finland) study wanted to determine if chocolate consumption during pregnancy had an effect on infant temperament at age of 6 months. Researchers began by asking 305 healthy pregnant women to report their chocolate consumption. Six months after birth, the researchers asked mothers to rate their infants’ temperament, including smiling, laughter, and fear. The babies born to women who had been eating chocolate daily during pregnancy were found to be more active and “positively reactive”—a measure that the investigators said encompasses traits like smiling and laughter.

(a) Was this an observational study or an experiment? Justify your answer.

(b) What are the explanatory and response variables?

(c) Does this study show that eating chocolate regularly during pregnancy helps produce infants with a good temperament? Explain.

The Web portal AOL places opinion poll questions next to many of its news stories. Simply click your response to join the sample. One of the questions

in January 2008 was “Do you plan to diet this year?” More than 30,000 people responded, with 68% saying “Yes.” You can conclude that

(a) about 68% of Americans planned to diet in 2008

(b) the poll used a convenience sample, so the results tell us little about the population of all adults.

(c) the poll uses voluntary response, so the results tell us little about the population of all adults.

(d) the sample is too small to draw any conclusion.

(e) None of these.

Aw, rats! A nutrition experimenter intends to compare the weight gain of newly weaned male rats fed Diet A with that of rats fed Diet B. To do this, she will feed each diet to 10 rats. She has available 10rats from one litter and 10rats from a second litter. Rats in the first litter appear to be slightly healthier.

(a) If the 10rats from Litter 1 were fed Diet A, the effects of genetics and diet would be confounded, and the experiment would be biased in favor of Diet A. Explain this statement carefully.

(b) Describe a better design for this experiment.

Explain it to the congresswoman You are on the staff of a member of Congress who is considering a bill that would provide government-sponsored insurance for nursing-home care. You report that 1128 letters have been received on the issue, of which 871 oppose the legislation. “I’m surprised that most of my constituents oppose the bill. I thought it would be quite popular,” says the congresswoman. Are you convinced that a majority of the voters oppose the bill? How would you explain the statistical issue to the congresswoman?

A simple random sample of 1200 adult Americans is selected, and each person is asked the following question: “In light of the huge national deficit, should the government at this time spend additional money to establish a national system of health insurance?” Only 39% of those responding answered “Yes.” This survey

(a) is reasonably accurate since it used a large simple random sample.

(b) needs to be larger since only about 24 people were drawn from each state.

(c) probably understates the percent of people who favor a system of national health insurance.

(d) is very inaccurate but neither understates nor overstates the percent of people who favor a system of national health insurance. Since simple random sampling was used, it is unbiased.

(e) probably overstates the percent of people who favor a system of national health insurance.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free