Attitudes toward alcohol At a party, there are 30 students over age 21 and 20 students under age 21 You choose at random 3 of those over 21 and separately choose at random 2 of those under 21 to interview about attitudes toward alcohol. You have given every student at the party the same chance to be interviewed: what is the chance? Why is your sample not an SRS?

Short Answer

Expert verified

A sample of 5 students beyond the age of 21 or a sample of 5 students under the age of 21 have no possibility of being interviewed.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

There are 30 students over the age of 21 and 20 students under the age of 21 at a party. You pick three people over the age of 21 and two people under the age of 21 at random to interview about alcohol.

02

Concept

A sample survey picks a group of people from a larger group of people about whom we want to learn more. The data from the sample is used to draw inferences about the population. It's critical to be specific about the demographic you're interested in and the characteristics you'll track.

03

Explanation

There are 30 students over the age of 21 and 20 students under the age of 21 at a party. Every student has an equal opportunity to be interviewed.

To choose three pupils over the age of 21from a group of thirty. Every student above the age of 21has a 3/30=1/10probability of being interviewed.

To choose two pupils under the age of 21from a group of twenty. Every student under the age of 21has a 2/20=1/10probability of being interviewed. In both cases, this is 1/10 An SRS ensures that any sample of a given size has the same chance of being chosen. It is not an SRS because not all students in each sample have the same chance of being questioned. In this case, a sample of 5 students beyond the age of 21 or a sample of 5 students under the age of 21 have no possibility of being interviewed.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Sampling gravestones The local genealogical society in Coles County, Illinois, has compiled records on all 55,914 gravestones in cemeteries in the county from the years 1825 to 1985 Historians plan to use these records to learn about African Americans in Coles County’s history. They first choose an SRS of 395 records to check their accuracy by visiting the actual gravestones.13

(a) Explain how you would use technology or Table D to choose the SRS. Your description should be clear enough for a classmate to obtain your results.

(b) Use your method from (a) to choose the first 3 gravestones.

Random digits In using Table D repeatedly to choose random samples, you should not always begin at the same place, such as line 101 Why not?

An example of a non-sampling error that can reduce the accuracy of a sample survey is

(a) using voluntary response to choose the sample.

(b) using the telephone directory as the sampling frame.

(c) interviewing people at shopping malls to obtain a sample.

(d) variation due to chance in choosing a sample at random.

(e) inability to contact many members of the sample.

Seat belt uses A study in El Paso, Texas, looked at seat belt use by drivers. Drivers were observed at randomly chosen convenience stores. After they left their cars, they were invited to answer questions that included questions about seat belt use. In all, 75% said they always used seat belts, yet only 61.5% were wearing seat belts when they pulled into the store parking lots.16 Explain the reason for the bias observed in responses to the survey. Do you expect bias in the same direction in most surveys about seat belt use?

Does eating dinner with their families improve students’ academic performance? According to an ABC News article, “Teenagers who eat with their families at least five times a week are more likely to get better grades in

school.”19 This finding was based on a sample survey conducted by researchers at Columbia University.

Explain clearly why such a study cannot establish a cause-and-effect

relationship. Suggest a lurking variable that may be confounded

with whether families eat dinner together.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free