Room temperature and dexterity An expert on worker performance is interested in the effect of room temperature on the performance of tasks requiring manual dexterity. She chooses temperatures of 70°Fand 90°Fas treatments. The response variable is the number of correct insertions, during a 30-minute period, in a peg-and-hole apparatus that requires the use of both hands simultaneously. Each

subject is trained on the apparatus and then asked to make as many insertions as possible in 30 minutes of continuous effort.

(a) Outline a completely randomized design to compare dexterity at70° and 90°. Twenty subjects are available.

(b) Because individuals differ greatly in dexterity, the wide variation in individual scores may hide the systematic effect of temperature unless there are many subjects in each group. Describe in detail the design of a matched pairs experiment in which

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) Twenty subjects are randomly assigned into two groups of ten each, treatments at two different temperature are applied to each group and results are compared.

(b) It can be done when both devices uses machine twice with both temperatures. Order is randomized per subject.

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

An expert on worker performance is interested in understanding the effect of room temperature on task performance requiring manual dexterity.

Each subject is trained on apparatus and asked to make as many insertions as possible in30minutes of continuous efforts.

02

To outline a completely randomized design to compare dexterity at 70°and 90°.

  • Assign twenty subjects randomly to two groups of ten subjects each.
  • Give treatment at 70°to one group and 90°to other group.
  • Compare the number of correct insertions.
03

To describe in detail the design of a matched pairs experiment in which each subject serves as his or her own control.

Since an expert on worker performance is interested in understanding the effect of room temperature on task performance requiring manual dexterity. In matched pair experiment, each subject serves his/her own control can be explained if each subject is using machine twice, at both temperatures. Order of usage is randomized per subject at different temperatures.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Treating prostate disease A large study used records from Canada’s national health care system to compare the effectiveness of two ways to treat prostate

disease. The two treatments are traditional surgery and a new method that does not require surgery. The records described many patients whose doctors had

chosen each method. The study found that patients treated by the new method were significantly more likely to die within eight years.

(a) Further study of the data showed that this conclusion was wrong. The extra deaths among patients who got the new method could be explained by lurking variables. What lurking variables might be confounded with a doctor’s choice of surgical or nonsurgical treatment?

(b) You have 300prostate patients who are willing to serve as subjects in an experiment to compare the two methods. Write a few sentences describing how you would design this experiment.

Growing in the shade Ability to grow in shade may help pines found in the dry forests of Arizona to resist drought. How well do these pines grow in shade?

Investigators planted pine seedlings in a greenhouse in either full light, lightly reduced to 25% of normal by shade cloth, or light reduced to5% of normal. At

the end of the study, they dried the young trees and weighed them.

Wording bias Comment on each of the following as a potential sample survey question. Is the question clear? Is it slanted toward the desired response?

(a) “Some cell phone users have developed brain cancer. Should all cell phones come with a warning label explaining the danger of using cell phones?”

(b) “Do you agree that a national system of health insurance should be favored because it would provide health insurance for everyone and would reduce

administrative costs?”

(c) “In view of escalating environmental degradation and incipient resource depletion, would you favor economic incentives for recycling of resource-intensive consumer goods?”

Layoffs and “survivor guilt” Workers who survive a layoff of other employees at their location may suffer from “survivor guilt.” A study of survivor guilt and its effects used as subjects120students who were offered an opportunity to earn extra course credit by doing proofreading. Each subject worked in the same

cubicle as another student, who was an accomplice of the experimenters. At a break midway through the work, one of three things happened:

Treatment 1: The accomplice was told to leave; it was explained that this was because she performed poorly.

Treatment 2: It was explained that unforeseen circumstances meant there was only enough work for one person. By “chance,” the accomplice was chosen to

be laid off.

Treatment 3: Both students continued to work after the break.

The subjects’ work performance after the break was compared with performance before the break. Describe how you would randomly assign the

subjects to the treatments

(a) using slips of paper.

(b) using Table D.

(c) using technology.

Chocolate and happy babies A University of Helsinki (Finland) study wanted to determine if chocolate consumption during pregnancy had an effect on infant temperament at age of 6 months. Researchers began by asking 305 healthy pregnant women to report their chocolate consumption. Six months after birth, the researchers asked mothers to rate their infants’ temperament, including smiling, laughter, and fear. The babies born to women who had been eating chocolate daily during pregnancy were found to be more active and “positively reactive”—a measure that the investigators said encompasses traits like smiling and laughter.

(a) Was this an observational study or an experiment? Justify your answer.

(b) What are the explanatory and response variables?

(c) Does this study show that eating chocolate regularly during pregnancy helps produce infants with a good temperament? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free