The nonprofit group Public Agenda conducted telephone interviews with three randomly selected groups of parents of high school children. There were 202black parents, 202Hispanic parents, and 201white parents. One question asked was “Are the high schools in your state doing an excellent, good, fair, or poor job, or don’t you know enough to say?” Here are the survey results:

(a) Calculate the conditional distribution (in proportions) of responses for each group of parents.

(b) Make an appropriate graph for comparing the conditional distributions in part (a).

(c) Write a few sentences comparing the distributions of responses for the three groups of parents

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a)

(b)

(c) The majority of parents have a favourable or balanced assessment of their children's high schools.

Hispanic parents believe that high school is the best and that they know the least.

In each category, the proportion of Poor opinions is nearly the same.

Step by step solution

01

Part (a) Step 1: Given information

The given data is

02

Part (a) Step 2: Explanation

We have to use the formula of probability:

Probability(p)=Number of favourableTotal number of exhaustive

For each group of parents, the conditional distribution of response can be determined as follows:

role="math" P(EB)=n(EN)nn(B)n=12202=0.0594

We may carry out this technique in the same way for all of them.

03

Part (b) Step 1: Given information

The given data is

04

Part (b) Step 2: Explanation

Let's make a comparison histogram.

The conditional probability computed in the exercise 28must have the same width and height for all bars.

05

Part (c) Step 1: Given information

The given data is

06

Part (c) Step 2: Explanation

From Part 2 of the graph (b)

The majority of parents have a favourable or balanced assessment of their children's high schools.

Hispanic parents believe that high school is the best and that they know the least.

In each category, the proportion of Poor opinions is nearly the same.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Your teacher prepares a large container full of colored beads. She claims that 1/8of the beads are red, 1/4are blue, and the remainder are yellow. Your class will take a simple random sample of beads from the container to test the teacher’s claim. The smallest number of beads you can take so that the conditions for performing inference are met is

(a) 15. (c) 30. (e) 80.

(b) 16. (d) 40

Many popular businesses are franchises—think of McDonald’s. The owner of local franchise benefits from brand recognition, national advertising, and detailed guidelines provided by the franchise chain. In return, he or she pays fees to the franchise firm and agrees to follow its policies. The relationship between the local owner and the franchise firm is spelled out in a detailed contract.

One clause that the contract may or may not contain is the entrepreneur’s right to an exclusive territory. This means that the new outlet will be the only representative of the franchise in a specified territory and will not have to compete with other outlets of the same chain. How does the presence of an exclusive-territory clause in the contract relate to the survival of the business?

A study designed to address this question collected data from a random sample of 170new franchise firms. Two categorical variables were measured for each franchisor. First, the franchisor was classified as successful or not based on whether or not it was still offering franchises as of a certain date. Second, the contract each franchisor offered to franchisees was classified according to whether or not there was an exclusive-territory clause. Here are the count data, arranged in a two-way table:

role="math" localid="1650453920307" Exclusive TerritorySuccessYesNoTotalYes10815123No341347Total14228170

Do these data provide convincing evidence of an association between an exclusive territory clause and business survival? Carry out an appropriate test at the α=0.01level.

Which of the following may we conclude, based on the test results?

(a) There is strong evidence of an association between wiring configuration and the chance that a child will develop some form of cancer.

(b) HCC either cause cancer directly or is a major contributing factor to the development of cancer in children.

(c) Leukemia is the most common type of cancer among children.

(d) There is not much evidence of an association between wiring configuration and the type of cancer that caused the deaths of children in the study.

No answer (4.1) Explain carefully how nonresponse could lead to bias in this project

Design (4.2) Was this an observational study or an experiment? Justify your answer.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free