As part of a bear population study, data were gath-ered on a sample of black bears inthewesternUnitedStates to examine the relationship between the bear’sneck girth (distance around the neck) and the weight ofthe bear. A scatterplot of the data reveals a straight-linepattern. The r2-value from a least-squares regression anal-ysis was determined to be r20.963. Which one of thefollowing is the correct value and corresponding interpre-tation for the correlation?

(a) The corrlation is 0.963, and 96.3%of the variationin a bear’s weight can be explained by the least squaresregression line using neck girth as the explanatory variable.

(b) The correlation is 0.963. There is a strong positive lin-ear relationship between a bear’s neck girth and its weight.

(c) The correlation is 0.981, and 98.1% of the variation ina bear’s weight can be explained by the least-squares regres-sion line using neck girth as the explanatory variable.

(d) The correlation is0.981. There is a strong negative lin-ear relationship between a bear’s neck girth and its weight.

(e) The correlation is 0.981. There is a strong positive lin-ear relationship between a bear’s neck girth and its weight.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Result is:

The correlation is0.981. There is a strong positive linear relationship between a bear's neck girth and it's weight.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

we have been given five options from which we have to find the correct one.

02

Explanation

They want you to interpret the correlation

r2=0.963|r|=0.981

remember doing the squares

r=0.981

Hence, (e) part is correct.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The P-value for the test in Question 5 is 0.0087. A correct interpretation of this result is that

(a) the probability that there is no linear relationship between an average number of putts per hole and total winnings for these 69players is 0.0087.

(b) the probability that there is no linear relationship between the average number of putts per hole and total winnings for all players on the PGA Tour’s world money list is 0.0087.

(c) if there is no linear relationship between an average number of putts per hole and total winnings for the players in the sample, the probability of getting a random sample of 69players yields a least-squares regression line with a slope of -4139198or less is 0.0087.

(d) if there is no linear relationship between an average number of putts per hole and total winnings for the players on the PGA Tour’s world money list, the probability of getting a random sample of 69 players yields a least-squares regression line with a slope of -4139198or less is 0.0087.

(e) the probability of making a Type II error is0.0087.

Snowmobiles (11.2) Do these data provide convincing evidence of an association between environmental club membership and snowmobile use for the population of visitors to Yellowstone National Park? Carry out an appropriate test at the 5% significance level

Following the debut of the new SAT Writing test in March 2005, Dr. Les Perelman from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology collected data from a set of sample essays provided by the College Board. A least-squares regression analysis was performed on these data. The two graphs below display the results of that analysis. Explain why the conditions for performing inference are not met in this setting.

Random assignment is part of a well-designed comparative experiment because

(a) It is more fair to the subjects.

(b) It helps create roughly equivalent groups before treatments are imposed on the subjects.

(c) It allows researchers to generalize the results of their experiment to a larger population.

(d) It helps eliminate any possibility of bias in the experiment.

(e) It prevents the placebo effect from occurring

Brawn versus brain How is the weight of an animal's brain related to the weight of its body?

Researchers collected data on the brain weight (in grams) and body weight (in kilograms) for 96species of mammals. The figure below is a scatterplot of the logarithm of brain weight against the logarithm of body weight for all 96species. The least-squares regression line for the transformed data is

logy^=1.01+0.72logx

Based on footprints and some other sketchy evidence, some people think that a large apelike animal, called Sasquatch or Bigfoot, lives in the Pacific Northwest. His weight is estimated to be about 280pounds, or 127kilograms. How big is Bigfoot’s brain? Show your method clearly

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free