The body’s natural electrical field helps wounds heal. If diabetes changes this field, it might explain why people with diabetes heal more slowly. A study of this idea compared randomly selected normal mice and randomly selected mice bred to spontaneously develop diabetes. The investigators attached sensors to the right hip and front feet of the mice and measured the difference in electrical potential (in millivolts) between these locations. Graphs of the data for each group reveal no outliers or strong skewness. The computer output below provides numerical summaries of the data26.

The researchers want to know if there is evidence of a significant difference in mean electrical potentials between normal mice and mice with diabetes. Carry out a test using a 5%level of significance and report your conclusion.

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is significance to support the claim of a difference.

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

We need to find if there is evidence of a significant difference in mean electrical potentials between normal mice and mice with diabetes or not.

02

Simplify

H0:μ1=μ2Ha:μ1μ2

Determine the test statistic:

t=x-1x-2s12n1+s22n2=13.09010.0224.839224+2.9152182.550

Determine the degrees of freedom:

Δ=s12n1+s22n22s12/n12n11+s22/n22n21=4.839224+2.91521824.8392/242241+2.9152/18218138.45983

Determine the corresponding P-value from table B:

0.01=2×0.005<P<2×0.01=0.02

If the P-value is less than or equal to the significance level, then the null hypothesis is rejected:

P<0.05=5%RejectH0

Here is significant to support the claim of a difference.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Could mud wrestling be the cause of a rash contracted by University of Washington students? Two physicians at the University of Washington student health center wondered about this when one male and six female students complained of rashes after participating in a mud-wrestling event. Questionnaires were sent to a random sample of students who participated in the event. The results, by gender, are summarized in the following table.

From the chi-square test performed in this study, we may conclude that

(a) there is convincing evidence of an association between the gender of an individual participating in the event and development of a rash.

(b) mud wrestling causes a rash, especially for women.

(c) there is absolutely no evidence of any relation between the gender of an individual participating in the event and the subsequent development of a rash.

(d) development of a rash is a real possibility if you participate in mud wrestling, especially if you do so on a regular basis.

(e) the gender of the individual participating in the event and the development of a rash are independent.

An old saying in golf is “You drive for show and you putt for dough.” The point is that good putting is more important than long driving for shooting low scores and hence winning money. To see if this is the case, data from a random sample of 69of the nearly 1000players on the PGA Tour’s world money list are examined. The average number of putts per hole and the player’s total winnings for the previous season is recorded. A least-squares regression line was fitted to the data. The following results were obtained from statistical software.

The correlation between total winnings and the average number of putts per hole for these players is

(a)-0.285

(b)-0.081

(c)0.007

(d)0.081

(e) 0.285

A study of road rage asked random samples of 596men and 523women about their behavior while driving. Based on their answers, each respondent was assigned a road rage score on a scale of 0to 20. The respondents were chosen by random digit dialing of telephone numbers. Are the conditions for two-sample t inference satisfied?

(a) Maybe. The data came from independent random samples, but we need to examine the data to check for Normality.

(b) No. Road rage scores in a range between 0and 20can’t be Normal.

(c) No. A paired t test should be used in this case.

(d) Yes. The large sample sizes guarantee that the corresponding population distributions will be Normal.

(e) Yes. We have two independent random samples and large sample sizes, and the 10%condition is met.

Boyle’s law Refers to Exercise 34. Here is Minitab output from separate regression analyses of the two sets of transformed pressure data:

Do each of the following for both transformations.

(a) Give the equation of the least-squares regression line. Define any variables you use.

(b) Use the model from part (a) to predict the pressure in the syringe when the volume is 17 cubic centimeters. Show your work.

(c) Interpret the value of s in context.

Following the debut of the new SAT Writing test in March 2005, Dr. Les Perelman from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology collected data from a set of sample essays provided by the College Board. A least-squares regression analysis was performed on these data. The two graphs below display the results of that analysis. Explain why the conditions for performing inference are not met in this setting.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free