Refer to Exercise 1. In Simon’s SRS, 16 of the students were left-handed. A significance test yields a P-value of 0.2184.

(a) Interpret this result in context.

(b) Do the data provide convincing evidence against the null hypothesis? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. When the population proportion is0.12there is0.2184chance of having 16or more left-handed students

b. No

Step by step solution

01

Explanation part (a)

We have,

sample size n = 100

population value p =0.2184

old population value p = 0.12

Calculating the null and alternative hypotheses,

Ho:p=0.12Ha:p0.12

When the population proportion is 0.12there is role="math" localid="1651658713340" 0.2184chance of having 16 or more left-handed students.

02

explanation part (b)

The null hypothesis is not valid if p value is less than 10%or 0.1

We know, p = role="math" localid="1651658846359" 0.2184which is greater than0.1

Hence the data does not provide convincing evidence against the null hypothesis as it cant be removed.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

For the job satisfaction study described in Section 9.1, the hypotheses are

H0:μ=0Ha:μisnotequalto0

where μis the mean difference in job satisfaction scores (self-paced machine-paced) in the population of assembly-line workers at the company. Data from a random sample of 18workers gave x=17and sx=60

Calculate the test statistic. Show your work.

You are thinking of conducting a one-sample t-test about a population mean M using a 0.05 significance level. You suspect that the distribution of the population is not Normal and may be moderately skewed. Which of the following statements is correct?

(a) You should not carry out the test because the population does not have a Normal distribution.

(b) You can safely carry out the test if your sample size is large and there are no outliers.

(c) You can safely carry out the test if there are no outliers, regardless of the sample size.

(d) You can carry out the test only if the population standard deviation is known.

(e) The t procedures are robust—you can u

A software company is trying to decide whether to produce an upgrade of one of its programs. Customers would have to pay \(100for the upgrade. For the upgrade to be profitable, the company needs to sell it to more than 20%of their customers. You contact a random sample of 60customers and find that 16 would be willing to pay \)100for the upgrade.

(a) Do the sample data give good evidence that more than 20%of the company’s customers are willing to purchase the upgrade? Carry out an appropriate test at the A=0.05significance level.

(b) Which would be a more serious mistake in this setting—a Type I error or a Type II error? Justify your answer.

(c) Other than increasing the sample size, describe one way to increase the power of the test in (a).

Fonts and reading ease Does the use of fancy type fonts slow down the reading of text on a computer screen? Adults can read four paragraphs of text in the common Times New Roman font in an average time of 22seconds. Researchers asked a random sample of 24adults to read this text in the omate font named Gigi. Here are their times, in seconds:

23.221.228.927.729.127.316.122.625.634.223.926.8
20.534.321.432.626.234.131.524.623.028.624.428.1

Do these data provide good evidence that the mean reading time for Gigi is greater than 22seconds? Carry out an appropriate test to help you answer this question.

- Use a confidence interval to draw a conclusion for a two-sided test about a population mean.

Do you have ESP? A researcher looking for evidence of extrasensory perception (ESP) tests 500subjects. Four of these subjects do significantly better P<0.01than random guessing.

(a) Is it proper to conclude that these four people have ESP? Explain your answer.

(b) What should the researcher now do to test whether any of these four subjects have ESP?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free