Explain in plain language why a significance test that is significant at the 1% level must always be significant at the 5% level. If a test is significant at the 5% level, what can you say about its significance at the 1% level?

Short Answer

Expert verified

It is not known the significance at1%level.

Step by step solution

01

introduction

the significance level is an outcome that has measurable importance when having happened given the invalid hypothesis is far-fetched

02

explanation

Given,

significance levels are 1%and 5%which is 0.01and 0.05

When the significant level is 0.05,

The null hypothesis is true as the probability of getting the sample value is less than0.05

The probability is either greater or less than 0.01

Hence It is not known the significance at 1%level.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The reason we use tprocedures instead of zprocedures when carrying out a test about a population mean is that

(a) zcan be used only for large samples.

(b)zrequires that you know the population standard deviation σ.

(c) zrequires you to regard your data as an SRS from the population.

(d) zapplies only if the population distribution is perfectly Normal.

(e) zcan be used only for confidence intervals.

Your company markets a computerized device for detecting high blood pressure. The device measures an individual’s blood pressure once per hour at a randomly selected time throughout a 12-hour period. Then it calculates the mean systolic (top number) pressure for the sample of measurements. Based on the sample results, the device determines whether there is significant evidence that the individual’s actual mean systolic pressure is greater than 130. If so, it recommends that the person seek medical attention.

(a) State appropriate null and alternative hypotheses in this setting. Be sure to define your parameter.

(b) Describe a Type I and a Type II error, and explain the consequences of each.

(c) The blood pressure device can be adjusted to decrease one error probability at the cost of an increase in the other error probability. Which error probability would you choose to make smaller, and why?

Are TV commercials louder than their surrounding programs? To find out, researchers collected data on 50randomly selected commercials in a given week. With the television’s volume at a fixed setting, they measured the maximum loudness of each commercial and the maximum loudness in the first 30seconds of regular programming that followed. Assuming conditions for inference are met, the most appropriate method for answering the question of interest is

(a) a one-proportion z test.

(b) a one-proportion z interval.

(c) a paired t test.

Which of the following 95%confidence intervals would lead us to reject H0 : p=0.30 in favor of

Ha :p not equal to 0.30 at the 5% significance level?

(a)(0.29,0.38)(c)(0.27,0.31)(e)Noneofthese(b)(0.19,0.27)(d)(0.24,0.30)

In planning a study of the birth weights of babies whose mothers did not see a

doctor before delivery, a researcher states the hypotheses as

H0:μ<1000gramsHa:μ=900grams

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free