A louse-y situation A study published in the New England Journal of Medicine compared two medicines to treat head lice: an oral medication called ivermectin and a topical lotion containing malathion. Researchers studied 812 people in 376 households in seven areas around the world. Of the 185 households randomly assigned to ivermectin, 171 were free from head lice after 2 weeks, compared with only 151 of the 191 households randomly assigned to malathion.

a. Calculate the difference (Ivermectin – Malathion) in the proportion of households that were free from head lice in the two groups.

One hundred trials of a simulation were performed to see what differences in proportions would occur due only to chance variation in the random assignment, assuming that the type of medication doesn’t matter. The results are shown in the dotplot.

b. There is one dot at 0.09. Explain what this dot means in this context.

c. Use the results of the simulation to determine if the difference in proportions from part (a) is statistically significant. Explain your reasoning.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) 0.1337is the difference in the proportion of households that were free from head lice in the two groups.

(b) The dot signifies that the difference between two medicines.

(c) The difference in mean is not statistically significant because other factors also influence the result.

Step by step solution

01

Part (a) Step 1: Given Information

We are given that the first medicine, Ivermectin, was used and shows171out of185were free from head lice. Therefore, the proportion of Ivermectin=171185

Second Medicine Malathion shows that151out of191was free from head lice

Therefore, the proportion of malathion=151191

02

Part (a) Step 2: Explanation

The difference in the proportions of the two medicines is: proportion of Ivermectin - Proportion of Malathion.

We have, difference=171185-151191

On solving, we get a difference.=0.1337

Hence, 0.1337the difference in the proportion of households that were free from head lice in the two groups.

03

Part (b) Step 1: Given Information

We are given the values of researchers' experiment randomly assigned to ivermectin and some were assigned to head lice and compared with malathion and we have to find out the significance of dot structure.

04

Part (b) Step 2: Explanation

The dot0.09 signifies that the chances are very small that the difference in the proportion of the two medicines is larger.

05

Part (c) Step 1: Given Information

We are given the values of researchers' experiments randomly assigned to ivermectin; some were assigned to head lice and compared with malathion and we have to find out if the result in part (a) is statistically significant or not.

06

Part (c) Step 2: Explanation

Using the results of the simulation to determine if the difference in proportions from part (a) is statistically significant, we conclude that the difference is quite significant statistically only if there is low probability that results have occurred by chance. Also the difference is less which depicts that probability of result by chance is less.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Dead trees On the west side of Rocky Mountain National Park, many mature pine trees are dying due to infestation by pine beetles. Scientists would like to use sampling to estimate the proportion of all pine trees in this area that have been infested.

a. Explain why it wouldn’t be practical for scientists to obtain an SRS in this setting.

b. A possible alternative would be to use every pine tree along the park’s main road as a sample. Why is this sampling method biased?

c. Suppose that a more complicated random sampling plan is carried out, and that 35% of the pine trees in the sample are infested by the pine beetle. Can scientists conclude that exactly 35% of all the pine trees on the west side of the park are infested? Why or why not?

Researchers randomly selected1700 people from Canada who had never suffered a

heart attack and rated the happiness of each person. Ten years later, the researchers

followed up with each person and found that people who were initially rated as happy

They were less likely to have a heart problem.

Which of the following is the most

appropriate conclusion based on this study?

a. Happiness causes better heart health for all people.

b. Happiness causes better heart health for Canadians.

c. Happiness causes better heart health for the1700people in the study.

d. Happier people in Canada are less likely to have heart problems.

e. Happier people in the study were less likely to have heart problems.

High-speed Internet Laying fiber-optic cable is expensive. Cable companies want to make sure that if they extend their lines to less dense suburban or rural areas, there will be sufficient demand so the work will be cost-effective. They decide to conduct a survey to determine the proportion of households in a rural subdivision that would buy the service. They select a simple random sample of 5blocks in the subdivision and survey each family that lives on one of those blocks.

a. What is the name for this kind of sampling method?

b. Give a possible reason why the cable company chose this method.

Checking for bias Comment on each of the following as a potential sample survey

question. Is the question clear? Is it slanted toward a desired response?

a. Which of the following best represents your opinion on gun control?

i. The government should confiscate our guns.

ii. We have the right to keep and bear arms.

b. A freeze in nuclear weapons should be favored because it would begin a much-needed

process to stop everyone in the world from building nuclear weapons now and reduce

the possibility of nuclear war in the future. Do you agree or disagree?

Meditation for anxiety An experiment that claimed to show that meditation lowers anxiety proceeded as follows. The experimenter interviewed the subjects and rated their level of anxiety. Then the subjects were randomly assigned to two groups. The experimenter taught one group how to meditate and they meditated daily for a month. The other group was simply told to relax more. At the end of the month, the experimenter interviewed all the subjects again and rated their anxiety level. The meditation group now had less anxiety. Psychologists said that the results were suspect because the ratings were not blind. Explain what this means and how lack of blindness could affect the reported results.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free