In the experiment of the preceding exercise, the subjects were randomly assigned to the

different treatments. What is the most important reason for this random assignment?

a. Random assignment eliminates the effects of other variables such as stress and body

weight.

b. Random assignment is a good way to create groups of subjects that are roughly

equivalent at the beginning of the experiment.

c. Random assignment makes it possible to make a conclusion about all men.

d. Random assignment reduces the amount of variation in blood pressure.

e. Random assignment prevents the placebo effect from ruining the results of the study.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Option b is correct answer: Random assignment is a good way to create groups of subjects that are roughly equivalent at the beginning of the experiment.

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

We need to find out reason for random assignment to different treatments in preceding exercise.

02

Explanation

In an experiment, random assignment is used to assign people to the control and treatment groups by chance. This procedure ensures that the groups are equal at the start of the investigation, making it safer to assume that the treatments are to blame for any differences observed by the experimenters at the end. As a result option b is correct answer.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

SRS of students? At a party, there are 30 students over age 21 and 20students underage21. You choose at random 3 of those over 21 and separately choose at random 2 of those under 21 to interview about their attitudes toward alcohol. You have given every student at the party the same chance to be interviewed. Is your sample an SRS? Explain your answer.

Go Blue! Michigan Stadium, also known as "The Big House," seats over 100,000fans for a football game. The University of Michigan Athletic Department wants to survey fans about concessions that are sold during games. Tickets are most expensive for seats on the sidelines. The cheapest seats are in the end zones (where one of the authors sat as a student). A map of the stadium is shown.


a. Describe how to obtain a sample using stratified random sampling. Explain your choice of strata and why this method might be preferred to simple random sampling.

b. Describe how to obtain a sample using cluster sampling. Explain your choice of clusters and why this method might be preferred to simple random sampling.

Want a snack- Can snacking on fruit rather than candy reduce later food consumption? Researchers randomly assigned12women to eat either65 calories of berries or 65calories of candy. Two hours later, all 12women were given an unlimited amount of pasta to eat. The researchers recorded the amount of pasta consumed by each subject. The women who ate the berries consumed133 fewer calories, on average. Identify the

explanatory and response variables, the experimental units, and the treatments.

The administration at a high school with 1800 students wants to gather student opinions about parking for students on campus. It isn’t practical to contact all students.

a. Give an example of a way to choose a voluntary response sample of students. Explain how this method could lead to bias.

b. Give an example of a way to choose a convenience sample of students. Explain how this method could lead to bias.

c. Describe how to select an SRSof50students from the school.

d. Explain how the method you described in part (c) avoids the biases you described in parts (a) and (b).

Foster care versus orphanages Do abandoned children placed in foster homes do better than similar children placed in an institution? The Bucharest Early Intervention Project found statistically significant evidence that they do. The subjects were 136young children abandoned at birth and living in orphanages in Bucharest, Romania. Half of the children, chosen at random, were placed in foster homes. The other half remained in the orphanages. (Foster care was not easily available in Romania at the time and so was paid for by the study.) What conclusion can we draw from this study? Explain your reasoning.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free