The correlation between the heights of fathers and the heights of their grownup sons, both measured in inches, isr=0.52. If fathers’ heights were measured in feet instead, the correlation between heights of fathers and heights of sons would be

a. much smaller than 0.52.

b. slightly smaller than 0.52.

c. unchanged; equal to 0.52.

d. slightly larger than 0.52.

e. much larger than 0.52.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The correlation between heights of fathers and heights of sons would be (c) unchanged; equal to 0.52.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

We need to find correlation between heights of fathers and heights of sons if it is measured in feets .

02

Explanation

Here we are given with value ofr=0.52

Also , measurement of correlation is unitless , it does not change with changing units ;

Moreover, the value is also arbitary in nature .

Therefore , the correlation between heights of fathers and heights of sons would be unchanged; equal to 0.52.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Mrs. Woods and Mrs. Bryan are avid vegetable gardeners. They use different fertilizers, and each claims that hers is the best fertilizer to use when growing tomatoes. Both agree to do a study using the weight of their tomatoes as the response variable. Each planted the same varieties of tomatoes on the same day and fertilized the plants on the same schedule throughout the growing season. At harvest time, each randomly selects 15 tomatoes from her garden and weighs them. After performing a two-sample t test on the difference in mean weights of tomatoes, they gett=5.24 andP=0.0008. Can the gardener with the larger mean claim that her fertilizer caused her tomatoes to be heavier?

a. Yes, because a different fertilizer was used on each garden.

b. Yes, because random samples were taken from each garden.

c. Yes, because the P-value is so small.

d. No, because the condition of the soil in the two gardens is a potential confounding variable.

e. No, because15<30

Starting in the 1970s, medical technology has enabled babies with very low birth weight (VLBW, less than1500grams, or about 3.3 pounds) to survive without major handicaps. It was noticed that these children nonetheless had difficulties in school and as adults. A long-term study has followed 242 randomly selected VLBW babies to age 20years, along with a control group of 233 randomly selected babies from the same population who had normal birth weight. 50

a. Is this an experiment or an observational study? Why?

b. At age20,179 of the VLBW group and 193 of the control group had graduated from high school. Do these data provide convincing evidence at the α=0.05 significance level that the graduation rate among VLBW babies is less than for normal-birth-weight babies?

Broken crackers We don’t like to find broken crackers when we open the package. How can makers reduce breaking? One idea is to microwave the crackers for 30seconds right after baking them. Randomly assign 65newly baked crackers to the microwave and another 65to a control group that is not microwaved. After 1day, none of the microwave group were broken and 16of the control group were broken. Let p1be the true proportions of crackers like these that would break if baked in the microwave and p2be the true proportions of crackers like these that would break if not microwaved. Check if the conditions for calculating a confidence interval forp1-p2met.

A researcher wished to compare the average amount of time spent in extracurricular activities by high school students in a suburban school district with that in a school district of a large city. The researcher obtained an SRS of 60high school students in a large suburban school district and found the mean time spent in extracurricular activities per week to be 6hours with a standard deviation of 3hours. The researcher also obtained an independent SRS of 40high school students in a large city school district and found the mean time spent in extracurricular activities per week to be 5hours with a standard deviation of 2hours. Suppose that the researcher decides to carry out a significance test of H0: μsuburban=μcity versus a two-sided alternativ

The P-value for the test is 0.048. A correct conclusion is to

a. fail to reject H0because0.048<α=0.05. There is convincing evidence of a difference in the average time spent on extracurricular activities by students in the suburban and city school districts.

b. fail to reject H0because 0.048<α=0.05. There is not convincing evidence of a difference in the average time spent on extracurricular activities by students in the suburban and city school districts.

c. fail to reject H0because0.048<α=0.05. There is convincing evidence that the average time spent on extracurricular activities by students in the suburban and city school districts is the same.

d. reject H0because 0.048<α=0.05. There is not convincing evidence of a difference in the average time spent on extracurricular activities by students in the suburban and city school districts.

e. reject H0because 0.048<α=0.05 . There is convincing evidence of a difference in the average time spent on extracurricular activities by students in the suburban and city school districts.

A random sample of size n will be selected from a population, and the proportion p^3051526=0.200=20.0%p^ of those in the sample who have a Facebook page will be calculated. How would the margin of error for a 95% confidence interval be affected if the sample size were increased from 50to200 and the sample proportion of people who have a Facebook page is unchanged?

a. It remains the same.

b. It is multiplied by 2.

c. It is multiplied by 4.

d. It is divided by 2.

e. It is divided by 4.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free