Reaction times Catherine and Ana wanted to know if student-athletes (students on at least one varsity team) have faster reaction times than non-athletes. They took separate random samples of 33 athletes and 30 non-athletes from their school and tested their reaction time using an online reaction test, which measured the time (in seconds) between when a green

light went on and the subject pressed a key on the computer keyboard. A 95% confidence interval for the difference (Non-athlete − Athlete) in the mean reaction time was3051526=0.200=20.0%0.018±0.034seconds

a. Does the interval provide convincing evidence of a difference in the true mean reaction time of athletes and non-athletes? Explain your answer.

b. Does the interval provide convincing evidence that the true mean reaction time of athletes and non-athletes is the same? Explain your answer.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Part a) No

Part b) No

Step by step solution

01

Part a) Step 1: Explanation

The95%confidence interval for the difference in mean reaction time between athletes and non-athletes is as follows:

role="math" localid="1654714398940" 0.018±0.034=(0.018-0.034,0.018+0.034)=(-0.016,0.052)

Then we notice that the confidence interval contains zero, implying that the difference in mean reaction time is likely to be zero, implying that there is no difference.

This means that there is no convincing evidence that athletes and non-athletes have different true mean reaction times.

02

Part b) Step 1: Explanation

The 95%confidence interval for the difference in mean reaction time between athletes and non-athletes is as follows:

0.018±0.034=(0.018-0.034,0.018+0.034)=(-0.016,0.052)

Then we notice that the confidence interval contains zero, implying that the difference in mean reaction time is likely to be zero, and thus that no difference exists.

However, there is no evidence that athletes and non-athletes have the same true mean reaction time because the difference of zero is one of the plausible values in the confidence interval for the difference, but there are many other plausible values in the confidence interval for the difference.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Coaching and SAT scores What we really want to know is whether coached students improve more than uncoached students, on average, and whether any advantage is large enough to be worth paying for. Use the information above to answer these questions:

a. How much more do coached students gain, on average, compared to uncoached students? Construct and interpret a 99%confidence interval.

b. Does the interval in part (a) give convincing evidence that coached students gain more, on average, than uncoached students? Explain your answer.

c. Based on your work, what is your opinion: Do you think coaching courses are worth paying for?

Suppose the true proportion of people who use public transportation to get to work in the Washington, D.C. area is 0.45. In a simple random sample of 250people who work in Washington, about how far do you expect the sample proportion to be from the true proportion?

a. 0.4975

b. 0.2475

c. 0.0315

d. 0.0009

e.0

A study of the impact of caffeine consumption on reaction time was designed to correct for the impact of subjects’ prior sleep deprivation by dividing the 24subjects into 12pairs on the basis of the average hours of sleep they had had for the previous 5 nights. That is, the two with the highest average sleep were a pair, then the two with the next highest average sleep, and so on. One randomly assigned member of each pair drank 2cups of caffeinated coffee, and the other drank 2cups of decaf. Each subject’s performance on a Page Number: 690standard reaction-time test was recorded. Which of the following is the correct check of the “Normal/Large Sample” condition for this significance test?

I. Confirm graphically that the scores of the caffeine drinkers could have come from a Normal distribution.

II. Confirm graphically that the scores of the decaf drinkers could have come from a Normal distribution.

III. Confirm graphically that the differences in scores within each pair of subjects could have come from a Normal distribution.

a. I only

b. II only

c. III only

d. I and II only

e. I, I, and III

Which inference method?

a. Drowning in bathtubs is a major cause of death in children less than5years old. A random sample of parents was asked many questions related to bathtub safety. Overall,85%of the sample said they used baby bathtubs for infants. Estimate the percent of all parents of young children who use baby bathtubs.

b. How seriously do people view speeding in comparison with other annoying behaviors? A large random sample of adults was asked to rate a number of behaviors on a scale of1(no problem at all) to5(very severe problem). Do speeding drivers get a higher average rating than noisy neighbors?

c. You have data from interviews with a random sample of students who failed to graduate from a particular college in7years and also from a random sample of students who entered at the same time and did graduate within7years. You will use these data to estimate the difference in the percent's of students from rural backgrounds among dropouts and graduates.

d. Do experienced computer-game players earn higher scores when they play with someone present to cheer them on or when they play alone? Fifty teenagers with experience playing a particular computer game have volunteered for a study. We randomly assign25 of them to play the game alone and the other25to play the game with a supporter present. Each player’s score is recorded.

Ban junk food! A CBS News poll asked 606 randomly selected women and 442

randomly selected men, “Do you think putting a special tax on junk food would encourage more people to lose weight?” 170 of the women and 102 of the men said “Yes.” A 99% confidence interval for the difference (Women – Men) in the true proportion of people in each population who would say “Yes” is −0.020to0.120. Does the confidence interval provide convincing evidence that the two population proportions are equal? Explain your answer.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free