Risks of playing soccer (1.1) A study in Sweden looked at former elite soccer players, people who had played soccer but not at the elite level, and people of the same age who did not play soccer. Here is a two-way table that classifies these individuals by whether or not they had arthritis of the hip or knee by their mid-fifties:

Part (a). What percent of the people in this study were elite soccer players? What percent of the people in this study developed arthritis?

Part (b). What percent of the elite soccer players developed arthritis? What percent of those who got arthritis were elite soccer players?

Part (c). Researchers suspected that the more serious soccer players were more likely to develop arthritis later in life. Do the data confirm this suspicion? Calculate appropriate percentages to support your answer.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Part (a)

Elite = 8.275%

Arthritis = 5.01%

Part (b)

Elite with Arthritis = 14.08%

People with arthritis who are elite player = 23.26%

Part (c) Yes

Step by step solution

01

Part (a). Step 1. Given information. 

Here is a two-way table that classifies these individuals by whether or not they had arthritis of the hip or knee by their mid-fifties

02

Part (a). Step 2. What proportion of the participants in this study were elite soccer players? How many people in this study developed arthritis?

We can see that 10 players were elite players with arthritis, while 61 were elite players with arthritis.

The percentage of people who were elite players is then calculated by dividing the total number of elite players by the sample size:

10+6110+61+9+206+24+548=71858718580.082750.08275=8.275%

We note that 10 players with arthritis were elite players, 9 were non-elite players, and 24 players with arthritis did not play.

The percentage of people with arthritis is then calculated by dividing the total number of players with arthritis by the sample size:

10+9+2410+61+9+206+24+548=43858438580.05010.0501=5.01%

03

Part (b). Step 1. How many elite soccer players developed arthritis? How many of those who developed arthritis were elite soccer players?

We can see that 10 players were elite players with arthritis, while 61 were elite players with arthritis.

The percent of elite players with arthritis is calculated by dividing the total number of elite players with arthritis by the total number of elite players.

1010+61=107110710.14080.1408=14.08%

We note that 10 players with arthritis were elite players, 9 were non-elite players, and 24 players with arthritis did not play.

The percentage of people with arthritis who were elite players is then calculated by dividing the total number of elite players with arthritis by the total number of people with arthritis:

1010+9+24=104310430.23262326=23.26%

04

Part (c). Step 1. Yes Researchers suspected that more serious soccer players had a higher risk of developing arthritis later in life.

We can see that 10 players were elite players with arthritis, while 61 were elite players with arthritis.

The percent of elite players with arthritis is then calculated by dividing the total number of elite players with arthritis by the total number of elite players:

The percentage of elite players who suffer from arthritis

1010+61=107110710.14080.1408=14.08%

We can see that there were 9 non-elite players with arthritis and 206 non-elite players with arthritis.

The percent of non-elite players with arthritis is calculated by dividing the total number of non-elite players with arthritis by the total number of non-elite players:

Percent of non-elite players who suffer from arthritis

99+206=921592150.041860.04186=4.186%

The percentage of elite players with arthritis (14.08 percent) is much higher than the percentage of non-elite players with arthritis (4.186 percent), confirming the suspicion that the more serious soccer players (elite players) were more likely to develop arthritis later in life.

As a result:

Yes

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Multiple Choice Select the best answer.

Exercises 9 and 10 refer to the following setting. At the Census Bureau website www.census.gov, you can view detailed data collected by the American Community Survey.

The following table includes data for 10 people chosen at random from the more than 1 million people in households contacted by the survey. “School” gives the highest level of education completed.

This data set contains

(a) 7 variables, 2 of which are categorical.

(b) 7 variables, 1 of which is categorical.

(c) 6 variables, 2 of which are categorical.

(d) 6 variables, 1 of which is categorical.

(e) None of these.

Snickers® are fun! Here are the weights (in grams) of 17 Snickers Fun Size bars from a single bag:

17.117.416,617.417.717.117.317.717.8
19.216.015.916.516.816.517.116.7

Part (a). Make a stemplot of these data.

Part (b). What interesting feature does the graph reveal?

Part (c). The advertised weight of a Snickers Fun Size bar is 17 grams. What proportion of candy bars in this sample weigh less than advertised?

Healthy cereal? Researchers collected data on calories per serving for 77 brands of breakfast cereal. The histogram displays the data.

Part (a). Describe the overall shape of the distribution of calories.

Part (b). What is the approximate center of this distribution?

Part (c). Explain why you cannot find the exact value for the maximum number of calories per serving for these cereal brands. Between what two values does it lie?

Part (d). About what percent of the cereal brands have 130 or more calories per serving?

Easy reading? Refer to Exercise 46. Describe the shape of the distribution.

House prices The mean and median selling prices of existing single-family homes sold in September 2016 were \(276,200 and \)234,200. Which of these numbers is the mean and which is the median? Explain your reasoning.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free