Husbands and wives The mean height of married American women in their

early 20s is 64.5 inches and the standard deviation is 2.5 inches. The mean height of married men the same age is 68.5 inches with standard deviation 2.7 inches. The correlation between the heights of husbands and wives is about r = 0.5.

a. Find the equation of the least-squares regression line for predicting a husband’s height from his wife’s height for married couples in their early 20s.

b. Suppose that the height of a randomly selected wife was 1 standard deviation below average. Predict the height of her husband without using the least-squares line.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Part (a)y=33.67+0.54x

Part (b)67.15inches.

Step by step solution

01

Part (a) Step 1: Given information

r=0.5x=64.5sx=2.5y=68.5sy=2.7

02

Part (a) Step 2: Explanation

The general equation of the regression line is:

y=a+bx

The slope of the regression line is:

b=rsysx=0.5×2.72.5=0.54

And the intercept is as:

a=ybx=68.50.54(64.5)=33.67

Thus, the equation of the regression line is:

y=a+bx=33.67+0.54x

03

Part (b) Step 1: Explanation

As a result, by noting that the wife's height is one standard deviation below the mean for women and that the man's expected height must match the correlation coefficient's product and the standard deviation below the mean, we can intuitively arrive at a solution:

y=y+rsy=68.50.5(2.7)=67.15

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The stock market Some people think that the behavior of the stock market in January predicts its behavior for the rest of the year. Take the explanatory variable x to be the percent change in a stock market index in January and the response variable y to be the change in the index for the entire year. We expect a positive correlation between x and y because the change during January contributes to the full year’s change. Calculation from data for an 18-year period gives x¯=1.75% sx=5.36% y¯=9.07% sy=15.35% r=0.596

a. Find the equation of the least-squares line for predicting full-year change from January change.

b. Suppose that the percent change in a particular January was 2 standard deviations above average. Predict the percent change for the entire year without using the least-squares line.

More turnovers? Refer to Exercise 15 Does the fact that r=0.92 suggest

that an increase in turnovers will cause NBA players to score more points? Explain your reasoning.

Less gas? Refer to Exercise 38.

a. Interpret the slope of the regression line.

b. Does the value of the y intercept have meaning in this context? If so, interpret the y intercept. If not, explain why.

The stock market Some people think that the behavior of the stock market in January predicts its behavior for the rest of the year. Take the explanatory variable x to be the percent change in a stock market index in January and the response variable y to be the change in the index for the entire year. We expect a positive correlation between x and y because the change during January contributes to the full year’s change. Calculation from data for an 18-year period gives x = X=1.75%sx=5.36%y=9.07%sy=15.35%r=0.596

(a) Find the equation of the least-squares line for predicting full-year change from January change. Show your work.

(b) The mean change in January is x=1.75%. Use your regression line to predict the change in the index in a year in which the index rises1.75% in January. Why could you have given this result (up to roundoff error) without doing the calculation?

The following graph plots the gas mileage (in miles per gallon) of various cars from the same model year versus the weight of these cars (in thousands of pounds). The points marked with red dots correspond to cars made in Japan. From this plot, we may conclude that

a. there is a positive association between weight and gas mileage for Japanese cars.

b. the correlation between weight and gas mileage for all the cars is close to 1.

c. there is little difference between Japanese cars and cars made in other countries.

d. Japanese cars tend to be lighter in weight than other cars.

e. Japanese cars tend to get worse gas mileage than other cars.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free