Could mud wrestling be the cause of a rash contracted by University of Washington students? Two physicians at the university’s student health center wondered about this when one male and six female students complained of rashes after participating in a mud-wrestling event. Questionnaires were sent to a random sample of students who participated in the event. The results, by gender, are summarized in the following table.

Here is some computer output for the preceding table. The output includes the observed counts, the expected counts, and the chi-square statistic.

From the chi-square test performed in this study, we may conclude that

a. there is convincing evidence of an association between the gender of an individual participating in the event and the development of a rash.

b. mud wrestling causes a rash, especially for women.

c. there is absolutely no evidence of any relationship between the gender of an individual participating in the event and the subsequent development of a rash.

d. development of a rash is a real possibility if you participate in mud wrestling, especially if you do so regularly.

e. the gender of the individual participating in the event and the development of a rash are independent.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The correct answer is option (a) There is convincing evidence of an association between the gender of an individual participating in the event and the development of a rash.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The given data is

02

Explanation

A study was done to see if mud wrestling could be the cause of a rash that University of Washington students had contracted. As a result of the possibilities, we may conclude that

Option (a): This can be determined because the chi-square test's null hypothesis claims that there is no correlation, whereas the alternative hypothesis states that there is.

Option (b): This can't be inferred because a chi-square test can only show association, not causation.

Option (c): This cannot be concluded because a sample always contains evidence.

Option (d): We can't draw any conclusions because we don't have any data on how often people participate in mud wrestling.

Option (e): This can't be concluded because the chi-square test just shows whether there's a link or not; it doesn't tell us if there's a link or not.

As a result, option (a) is the proper choice.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Heart weights of mammals Here are some data on the hearts of various mammals:

a. Make an appropriate scatterplot for predicting heart weight from length. Describe what you see.

b. Use transformations to linearize the relationship. Does the relationship between heart weight and length seem to follow an exponential model or a power model? Justify your answer.

c. Perform least-squares regression on the transformed data. Give the equation of your regression line. Define any variables you use.

d. Use your model from part (c) to predict the heart weight of a human who has a left ventricle6.8 cm long.

The following back-to-back stem plots compare the ages of players from two minor-league hockey teams (1/7=17 years)

Which of the following cannot be justified from the plots?

a. Team A has the same number of players in their 30sas does Team B.

b. The median age of both teams is the same.

c. Both age distributions are skewed to the right.

d. The range of age is greater for Team A

e. There are no outliers by the1.5IQR rule in either distribution.

Boyle’s law Refers to Exercise 34. We took the logarithm (base 10) of the values for both volume and pressure. Here is some computer output from a linear regression analysis of the transformed data.


a. Based on the output, explain why it would be reasonable to use a power model to describe the relationship between pressure and volume.

b. Give the equation of the least-squares regression line. Be sure to define any variables you use.

c. Use the model from part (b) to predict the pressure in the syringe when the volume is 17cubic centimeters.

Brawn versus brain How is the weight of an animal’s brain related to the weight of its body? Researchers collected data on the brain weight (in grams) and body weight (in Page Number: 813 Page Number: 814 kilograms) for 96species of mammals. The following figure is a scatterplot of the logarithm of brain weight against the logarithm of body weight for all 96species. The least-squares regression line for the transformed data is

logy=1.01+0.72logxlogy^=1.01+0.72logx

Based on footprints and some other sketchy evidence, some people believe that a large ape-like animal, called Sasquatch or Bigfoot, lives in the Pacific Northwest. Bigfoot’s weight is estimated to be about 127kilograms (kg). How big do you expect Bigfoot’s brain to be?

After a name-brand drug has been sold for several years, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will allow other companies to produce a generic equivalent. The FDA will permit the generic drug to be sold as long as there isn't convincing evidence that it is less effective than the name-brand drug. For a proposed generic drug intended to lower blood pressure, the following hypotheses will be us

where

μG=true mean reduction in blood pressureusing the generic drug μG=true mean reduction in blood pressureusing the name@brand drug

μG=true mean reduction in blood pressure

using the generic drug

μG=true mean reduction in blood pressure

using the name@brand drug

In the context of this situation, which of the following describes a Type I error?

a. The FDA finds convincing evidence that the generic drug is less effective, when in reality it is less effective.

b. The FDA finds convincing evidence that the generic drug is less effective, when in reality it is equally effective.

c. The FDA finds convincing evidence that the generic drug is equally effective, when in reality it is less effective.

d. The FDA fails to find convincing evidence that the generic drug is less effective, when in reality it is less effective.

e. The FDA fails to find convincing evidence that the generic drug is less effective, when in reality it is equally effective.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free