An experimenter wishes to test if one of two types of fish food (a standard fish food and a new product) is better for producing fish of equal weight after a two-month feeding program. The experimenter has two identical fish tanks (1 and 2) and is considering how to assign 40 fish, each of which has a numbered tag, to the tanks. The best way to do this would be to

a. put all the odd-numbered fish in Tank 1 and the even-numbered fish in Tank 2. Give the standard food to Tank 1 and the new product to Tank 2.

b. obtain pairs of fish whose weights are roughly equal at the start of the experiment and randomly assign one of the pair to Tank 1 and the other to Tank 2. Give the standard food to Tank 1 and the new product to Tank 2.

c. proceed as in option (b), but put the heavier of each pair into Tank 2. Give the standard food to Tank 1 and the new product to Tank 2.

d. assign the fish completely at random to the two tanks using a coin flip: heads means Tank 1 and tails means Tank 2. Give the standard food to Tank 1 and the new product to Tank 2.

e. divide the 40 fish into two groups, with the 20 heaviest fish in one group. Randomly choose which tank to assign the heaviest fish and assign the lightest fish to the other tank. Give the standard food to Tank 1 and the new product to Tank 2.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The correct answer is option (b) obtain pairs of fish whose weights are roughly equal at the start of the experiment and randomly assign one of the pair to Tank 1and the other to Tank 2. Give the standard food to Tank 1and the new product to Tank 2.

Step by step solution

01

Concept introduction

In quantitative tests, segmentation is the technique of selecting a predefined dataset from a huge population. Vary based on the type of assessment being undertaken, the measures taken to recruit from a general community may include simple chance picking or multi - stage sampling.

02

Explanation

We need to figure out the most efficient strategy to assign fish to the two identical fish tanks.

Looking at the possibilities, we can see that

Option (a) is not the best option because odd-numbered fish may have consistently higher or lower weights than even-numbered fish.

This suggests that the two groups will be different before the experiment begins, and we cannot be certain whether the differences observed after the treatment are attributable to the treatments or to the weight difference previous to the treatment.

Option (b) is a suitable option since the weights of the two groups will be similar, and the fish in each pair will be assigned to a treatment group at random.

Option (c) is not a suitable option because the fish in the second tank will weigh more than those in the first. This means that the two tanks will start off differently.

Option (d) is not a good option because the fish's weight is not taken into account.

Option (e) is not a suitable option because the fish in the second tank will be heavier than those in the first. This means that the two tanks will start off differently. As a result, option (b) is the proper choice.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Braking distance How is the braking distance for a motorcycle related to the speed at which the motorcycle was traveling when the brake was applied? Statistics teacher Aaron Waggoner gathered data to answer this question. The table shows the speed (in miles per hour) and the distance needed to come to a complete stop when the brake was applied (in feet).

Speed (mph)Distance (ft)Speed (mph)Distance (ft)61.423252.0894.924084191848110.333044.75

a. Transform both variables using logarithms. Then calculate and state the least-squares regression line using the transformed variables.

b. Use the model from part (a) to calculate and interpret the residual for the trial when the motorcycle was traveling at 48 mph.

Click-through rates Companies work hard to have their website listed at the top of an Internet search. Is there a relationship between a website’s position in the results of an Internet search (1=top position,2=2nd position, etc.) and the percentage of people who click on the link for the website? Here are click-through rates for the top 10 positions in searches on a mobile device:

a. Make an appropriate scatterplot for predicting click-through rate from the position. Describe what you see.

b. Use transformations to linearize the relationship. Does the relationship between click-through rate and position seem to follow an exponential model or a power model? Justify your answer.

c. Perform least-squares regression on the transformed data. Give the equation of your regression line. Define any variables you use.

d. Use your model from part (c) to predict the click-through rate for a website in the 11th position.

The following back-to-back stem plots compare the ages of players from two minor-league hockey teams (1/7=17 years)

Which of the following cannot be justified from the plots?

a. Team A has the same number of players in their 30sas does Team B.

b. The median age of both teams is the same.

c. Both age distributions are skewed to the right.

d. The range of age is greater for Team A

e. There are no outliers by the1.5IQR rule in either distribution.

Braking distance, again How is the braking distance for a car related to the amount of tread left on the tires? Here are the braking distances (measured in car lengths) for a car making a panic stop in standing water, along with the tread depth of the tires (in 1/32inch):

Tread depth (1/32 inch)Breaking distance (car lengths)119.7109.8910.1810.4710.8611.2511.8412.4313.6115.2

a. Transform both variables using logarithms. Then calculate and state the least-squares regression line using the transformed variables.

b. Use the model from part (a) to calculate and interpret the residual for the trial when the tread depth was 3/32 inch.

Counting carnivores Ecologists look at data to learn about nature’s patterns. One pattern they have identified relates the size of a carnivore (body mass in kilograms) to how many of those carnivores exist in an area. A good measure of “how many” is to count carnivores per 10,000 kg of their prey in the area. The scatterplot shows this relationship between body mass and abundance for 25 carnivore species.

The following graphs show the results of two different transformations of the data. The first graph plots the logarithm (base 10) of abundance against body mass. The second graph plots the logarithm (base 10) of abundance against the logarithm (base 10) of body mass.

a. Based on the scatterplots, would an exponential model or a power model provide a better description of the relationship between abundance and body mass? Justify your answer.

b. Here is a computer output from a linear regression analysis of log(abundance) and log(body mass). Give the equation of the least-squares regression line. Be sure to define any variables you use.

c. Use your model from part (b) to predict the abundance of black bears, which have a body mass of 92.5 kg.

d. Here is a residual plot for the linear regression in part (b). Do you expect your prediction in part (c) to be too large, too small, or about right? Justify your answer.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free