Do you have ESP? A researcher looking for evidence of extrasensory perception (ESP) tests 500 subjects. Four of these subjects do significantly better (P<0.01) than random guessing.

a. Is it proper to conclude that these four people have ESP? Explain your answer.

b. What should the researcher now do to test whether any of these four subjects have ESP?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Part (a) It is possible that 4 of the 500 subjects have a p-value below the 0.01

Part (b) Researchers should retest these 4 subjects for ESP

Step by step solution

01

Part (a) Step 1: Given information

n=500x=4P<0.01

02

Part (a) Step 2: Calculation

No, since a p-value of 0.01 would be expected in around 1% of the 500subjects Because 1% of 500 subjects corresponds to 5 subjects, it's likely that four of the 500 subjects have a p-value of less than 0.01

When null hypotheses of random guessing are true, the p-value is really the probability of getting test findings, or more extreme, when null hypotheses of random guessing are true. As a result, it's likely that these four participants with p-values less than 0.01did not have EPSP.

Thus, it is possible that 4 of the 500 subjects have a p-value below the 0.01

03

Part (b) Step 1: Calculation

These four subjects should be retested for ESP. If they perform much better than random guessing once more, they are highly likely to have ESP.

Thus, Researchers should retest these 4 subjects for ESP.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Side effects A drug manufacturer claims that less than 10%of patients who take its new drug for treating Alzheimer’s disease will experience nausea. To test this claim, researchers conduct an experiment. They give the new drug to a random sample of 300out of 5000Alzheimer’s patients whose families have given informed consent for the patients to participate in the study. In all, 25of the subjects experience nausea.

a. Describe a Type I error and a Type II error in this setting, and give a possible

consequence of each.

b. Do these data provide convincing evidence for the drug manufacturer’s claim?

Attitudes Refer to Exercise 4. In the study of older students’ attitudes, the sample mean SSHA score was 125.7 and the sample standard deviation was 29.8. A significance test yields a P-value of 0.0101.

a. Explain what it would mean for the null hypothesis to be true in this setting.

b. Interpret the P-value.

Which of the following is not a condition for performing a significance test about an unknown population proportion p?

(a) The data should come from a random sample or randomized experiment.

(b) Individual measurements should be independent of one another.

(c) The population distribution should be approximately Normal, unless the sample size is large.

(d) Both np and n(1 - p) should be at least 10.

(e) If you are sampling without replacement from a finite population, then you should sample no more than 10% of the population.

Based on the P-value in Exercise 31, which of the following would be the most

appropriate conclusion?

a. Because the P-value is large, we reject H0. We have convincing evidence that more than 50%of city residents support the tax increase.

b. Because the P-value is large, we fail to reject H0. We have convincing evidence that more than 50%of city residents support the tax increase.

c. Because the P-value is large, we reject H0. We have convincing evidence that at most 50%of city residents support the tax increase.

d. Because the P-value is large, we fail to reject H0. We have convincing evidence that at most 50%of city residents support the tax increase.

e. Because the P-value is large, we fail to reject H0. We do not have convincing

evidence that more than 50%of city residents support the tax increase.

A milk processor monitors the number of bacteria per milliliter in raw milk received at the factory. A random sample of 10one-milliliter specimens of milk supplied by one producer gives the following data:

Construct and interpret a 90% confidence interval for the population mean μ.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free