T/F: Copernicus's determinations of the distances between the planets and the Sun were quite accurate.

Short Answer

Expert verified
False. Copernicus's determinations were not accurate by today's standards.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Historical Context

Nicolaus Copernicus was a Renaissance-era polymath who proposed a heliocentric model of the universe with the Sun at the center, rather than the Earth. Copernicus's work laid the groundwork for modern astronomy.
02

Analyze Copernicus's Methodology

Copernicus used geometric models and observational data available in his time to estimate the distances of the planets from the Sun. However, his measurements were limited by the accuracy of the instruments and the data available in the 16th century.
03

Compare Copernicus's Distances to Modern Measurements

Modern astronomy, aided by telescopes and space probes, has provided highly precise measurements of planetary distances. Comparatively, Copernicus’s estimates were less accurate, though they were innovative for his era.
04

Draw the Conclusion

Given that Copernicus's methods and data were limited by the technological standards of his time, his determinations of planetary distances were not very accurate by today's standards, even though they represented significant progress for his time.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

heliocentric model
Nicolaus Copernicus revolutionized our understanding of the universe with his heliocentric model.
The heliocentric model posits that the Sun, not the Earth, is at the center of our solar system.
This idea challenged the long-held geocentric model, which placed Earth at the center of the universe.

Copernicus's model explained the apparent retrograde motion of planets without complex adjustments.
Instead of planets moving in epicycles around Earth, they orbited the Sun in simple, circular paths.
This shifted the perspective of how the cosmos operates and set the stage for future astronomers.

Understanding this model was crucial to answering the exercise question since it provides the context for why Copernicus's distance measurements to planets held such significance.
historical astronomy
Historical astronomy is the study of how ancient civilizations understood and interpreted celestial bodies. Nicolaus Copernicus is a key figure in this field.
Living during the Renaissance, he dared to propose a heliocentric model, despite the dominant geocentric view.
This shift wasn't just scientific but also cultural and philosophical.

Copernicus used the limited data and crude instruments of his time to estimate the distances of planets.
His work marked the transition from ancient to modern astronomy, introducing geometry into the realm of cosmic measurements.
The use of observational data and mathematical models, even if imprecise, was groundbreaking.

Understanding Copernicus’s place in historical astronomy helps us appreciate the progress and challenges in the field.
measurement accuracy
Measurement accuracy refers to how close a measured value is to the actual, true value. Copernicus faced significant challenges in this area.
His instruments lacked the precision of modern tools, affecting the accuracy of his planetary distance estimates.
The 16th century had no telescopes, so all observations were made with the naked eye.

Despite these limitations, Copernicus's work represented a big leap from previous models.
Modern advancements in technology, such as space probes and powerful telescopes, have dramatically improved measurement accuracy.

Thus, while Copernicus's values were not very accurate by today's standards, they were groundbreaking for his time.
This distinction is essential when evaluating the true/false statement about his determinations.
observational data
Observational data is the information gathered by observing celestial bodies. This data is crucial for making accurate astronomical models.
In Copernicus's era, data collection involved direct observation, typically with the naked eye or rudimentary instruments.
He meticulously recorded planetary positions to create his geometric models.

Although the data was imprecise due to technological limitations, it was foundational for the heliocentric model.
Modern observational data, collected through advanced telescopes and satellite missions, provides much higher accuracy.

This high-quality data allows for precise measurements of planetary distances, eclipsing the estimates made by Copernicus.
Understanding the evolution of observational data helps us see the progress in our knowledge of the solar system.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose you discover a planet around a Sun-like star. From careful observation over several decades, you find that its period is 12 Earth years. Find the semimajor axis.

A_______model of the Solar System puts Earth at the model of the Solar System puts Earth at the center, while a ______ model of the Solar System puts the Sun at the center. a. geocentric; heliocentric b. heliocentric; geocentric c. heliocentric; Copernican d. geocentric; Ptolemaic

Suppose you read in the newspaper that a new planet has been found. Its average speed in orbit is \(33 \mathrm{km} / \mathrm{s}\). When it is closest to its star it moves at \(31 \mathrm{km} / \mathrm{s}\), and when it is farthest from its star it moves at \(35 \mathrm{km} / \mathrm{s}\). This story is in error because a. the average speed is far too fast. b. Kepler's third law says the planet has to sweep out equal areas in equal times, so the speed of the planet cannot change. c. planets stay at a constant distance from their stars; they don't move closer or farther away. d. Kepler's second law says the planet must move fastest when it's closest, not when it is farthest away. e. using these numbers, the square of the orbital period will not be equal to the cube of the semimajor axis.

Galileo came up with the concept of inertia. What do we mean by inertia? How is it related to mass?

Kepler's first law replaced Copernicus's perfect circles with ellipses, thus shattering the idea that a. Tycho's data were accurate. b. the Sun is at a focus. c. the heavens were perfect, with perfectly round objects and perfectly round orbits. d. Earth goes around the Sun.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free