Log out Go to App
Go to App

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 22: Problem 25

The standard model cannot explain why neutrinos have mass or why electron- positron asymmetry existed in the early universe. Do these failings make it an incomplete theory? Should all of its predictions be ignored until the theory can resolve these remaining issues?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The standard model is incomplete but not all its predictions should be ignored as it accurately explains many phenomena.

Step by step solution

01

- Identify the Main Points

First, recognize the main issues in the exercise: the standard model not explaining neutrino mass and electron-positron asymmetry. Then, consider if these failings make the theory incomplete and whether its predictions should be ignored.
02

- Incomplete Theory Analysis

Acknowledge that the standard model is an incomplete theory because it does not account for all observed phenomena, such as neutrino mass and the electron-positron asymmetry.
03

- Evaluate the Predictions

Consider the extent to which the standard model's predictions are accurate. Many of the model's predictions have been confirmed experimentally, reinforcing its validity despite certain failings.
04

- Conclusion on Ignoring Predictions

Finally, assess whether the unresolved issues justify ignoring all predictions. Conclude that while the theory has its limitations, it should not lead to dismissing all its predictions, as they still provide accurate descriptions and predictions for many phenomena.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Neutrino Mass
The Standard Model of particle physics initially assumed neutrinos were massless particles. This made sense because neutrinos interact very weakly with other particles, making them difficult to study. However, experiments revealed that neutrinos do have mass, which contradicts the original assumptions of the Standard Model.

So, why does this contradiction matter? Neutrino mass is significant because:
  • Neutrino oscillations: The discovery of neutrino mass came from observing neutrinos changing types (or 'flavors') as they travel. This phenomenon, known as neutrino oscillation, requires neutrinos to have mass.
  • Implications for physics: Neutrino mass means the Standard Model needs an update. It indicates the existence of physics beyond the Standard Model, pushing scientists to search for new theories and explanations.
Therefore, the observation of neutrino mass showcases an important limitation in the Standard Model, because it cannot adequately explain this property of neutrinos.
Electron-Positron Asymmetry
In the early universe, matter and antimatter should have been created in equal amounts according to the Standard Model. This means electrons and positrons (their antimatter counterparts) should have existed in equal numbers. However, that's not what we observe today.

Instead, we see a universe dominated by matter, with very little antimatter around. This is called 'electron-positron asymmetry.'

Understanding this asymmetry is crucial because:
  • Formation of the universe: This imbalance led to the matter-dominated universe we live in, enabling galaxies, stars, and planets to form.
  • Theoretical implications: The inability of the Standard Model to explain this asymmetry suggests there are unknown processes or interactions not covered by the theory.
Thus, electron-positron asymmetry presents another fundamental limitation of the Standard Model. It implies missing pieces in our understanding of the early universe and the forces that shaped it.
Incomplete Theory
Given its limitations, can we say the Standard Model is an 'incomplete theory'? Yes, but that doesn't mean it's useless.

Here's why it's still valuable despite its shortcomings:
  • Accurate predictions: Many predictions made by the Standard Model have been experimentally verified. This includes the discovery of particles like the Higgs boson.
  • Framework for new research: The Standard Model serves as a strong foundation for exploring new physics, even though it doesn't explain everything.
  • Guidance for further discovery: It highlights areas where new experiments and theories are needed, such as those involving dark matter and neutrino mass.
The Standard Model remains a cornerstone of theoretical physics; it’s incomplete, but an incomplete theory that has been highly successful in explaining a vast array of phenomena. It helps scientists to know where to look for new physics.
Theoretical Physics
The field of theoretical physics involves creating models and theories to explain the fundamental nature of the universe. The Standard Model is one such theory, and it's been incredibly successful in many respects.

However, as we've seen with neutrino mass and electron-positron asymmetry, theoretical physics is an ever-evolving field.

Key elements of theoretical physics include:
  • Predictive power: Good theories make predictions that can be tested through experiments. The Standard Model predicts many particle behavior aspects and interactions.
  • Flexibility and adaptability: When new observations (like neutrino mass) challenge existing models, theorists modify or replace old theories to accommodate new data.
  • Unifying principles: The ultimate goal is a 'Theory of Everything' that can explain all physical phenomena. While the Standard Model brings us closer, it's clear more work is needed.
As we probe deeper into the unknown, the role of theoretical physics grows. Each discovery, including the limitations of the Standard Model, is a step toward a more complete understanding of the universe.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

One GUT theory predicts that a proton will decay in about \(10^{31}\) years, which means if you have \(10^{31}\) protons, you should see one decay per year. The Super-Kamiokande observatory in Japan holds about 20 million kg of water in its main detector, and it did not see any decays in 5 years of continual operation. What limit does this observation place on proton decay and on the GUT theory described here?

If the universe is being forced apart by dark energy, why isn't the Milky Way Galaxy, the Solar System, or the planet Earth being torn apart?

Why is particle physics important for understanding the early universe?

What are the basic differences between a grand unified theory (GUT) and a theory of everything (TOE)?

Describe the observational evidence suggesting that Einstein's cosmological constant (a repulsive force) may be needed to explain the historical expansion of the universe. Explain how Einstein was "right for the wrong reason."
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

Atoms and Radioactivity

Read Explanation

Geometrical and Physical Optics

Read Explanation

Kinematics Physics

Read Explanation

Thermodynamics

Read Explanation

Electromagnetism

Read Explanation

Wave Optics

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free