Log out Go to App
Go to App

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 24: Problem 27

The two Viking spacecraft did not find convincing evidence of life on Mars when they visited that planet in the late 1970 s nor did the Phoenix lander when it examined the martian soil in \(2009 .\) Do these results imply that life never existed on the planet? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified
No, it does not imply that life never existed on Mars because absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Question

The question asks whether the lack of evidence found by the Viking spacecraft and the Phoenix lander means that life never existed on Mars. It also asks for a rationale behind the answer.
02

Evaluate the Evidence

Consider the data collected by the Viking spacecraft in the late 1970s and the Phoenix lander in 2009. Note that both missions did not find convincing evidence of life on Mars.
03

Scientific Interpretation of Data

Understand that not finding evidence is not the same as evidence of absence. The absence of evidence of life on Mars does not mean life never existed there.
04

Consider Limitations and Future Research

Discuss the limitations of past missions and the potential for future missions to find evidence. Limited scope, technology, and conditions of investigation mean current results do not conclusively deny the past or future possibility of life on Mars.
05

Conclusion and Reasoning

Explain that the lack of current evidence does not imply definite conclusions about the entire history of Mars. Future missions and advancements in technology may yield different results.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Viking spacecraft
The Viking spacecraft were two robotic probes sent by NASA to Mars in the late 1970s. They were tasked with examining the Martian surface and looking for signs of life. These spacecraft were equipped with various scientific instruments. Their findings were crucial for our understanding of Mars, even if they didn't find definitive evidence of life.
The main objectives of Viking missions included:
  • Analyzing the Martian soil
  • Studying the planet's atmosphere
  • Taking high-resolution images of the surface
These missions set the groundwork for future exploration of the Red Planet.
Phoenix lander
The Phoenix lander, another NASA project, landed on Mars in 2008, near the planet's north pole. Its mission was to dig through Martian soil to study its composition and to look specifically for water ice. While it did find water ice, it did not find biological material. However, the Phoenix lander provided vital data about Mars' geology and climate.
The mission goals were:
  • Studying water history in the Martian arctic
  • Looking for potential habitable zones
  • Monitoring the weather and climate
These goals aimed to improve our understanding of Mars and its potential to support life.
scientific evidence
In scientific research, findings are based on careful collection and analysis of data. For missions like Viking and Phoenix, the scientific evidence they gathered provides crucial insights into Mars. This includes data on soil composition, atmospheric conditions, and other factors essential for life. To date, these missions have not found irrefutable evidence of life.
However, the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Scientific results are often influenced by the limitations of the technology and methods used. Future missions with advanced instruments could potentially unveil different evidence related to Martian life.
Mars exploration
Mars exploration aims to understand the planet's potential to support life, its climate, and its geology. Different missions, both past and future, help scientists gather critical data. Mars exploration involves:
  • Robotic missions like Viking, Phoenix, Curiosity, and Perseverance
  • Orbital missions that map the planet and study its atmosphere
  • Future missions that may bring samples back to Earth
Each mission builds on the knowledge from previous ones, advancing our understanding and paving the way for human exploration.
future research limitations
While past missions have provided valuable information, there are limitations in current Mars research. These include technological constraints, the limited scope of current missions, and the challenging conditions of the Martian environment. Advances in technology could help overcome these limitations in the future.
Future research aims to:
  • Develop more sophisticated instruments for detecting life
  • Enhance robotic missions for better data collection
  • Prepare for human missions to Mars
Understanding these limitations helps guide better strategy and mission planning for Mars exploration.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The doubling time for Escherichia coli is 20 minutes, and you start getting sick when just 10 bacteria enter your system. How many bacteria are in your body after 12 hours?

During the Cambrian explosion a. the dinosaurs were killed. b. all the carbon that is now here on Earth was produced. c. biodiversity increased significantly. d. a lot of carbon dioxide was released into the atmosphere.

The Kepler Mission is currently searching for planets in the habitable zones of stars. Explain which factors in the Drake equation are affected by this search and how the final number \(N\) will be affected if Kepler finds that most stars have planets in their habitable zones.

A mutation is a. always a deadly change to DNA. b. always a beneficial change to DNA. c. a change to DNA that is sometimes beneficial and sometimes not. d. a change to DNA that is not inheritable.

Astronomers think that intelligent life is more likely to be found around stars of types \(\mathrm{F}, \mathrm{G}, \mathrm{K},\) and \(\mathrm{M}\) because a. those stars are hot enough to have planets and moons with liquid water. b. those stars are cool enough to have planets and moons with liquid water c. those stars live long enough for life to begin and evolve. d. those stars produce no ultraviolet radiation or X-rays.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

Torque and Rotational Motion

Read Explanation

Oscillations

Read Explanation

Medical Physics

Read Explanation

Mechanics and Materials

Read Explanation

Particle Model of Matter

Read Explanation

Force

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free