Near the cells where oxygen is used, its chemical potential is significantly lower than near the lungs. Even though there is no gaseous oxygen near these cells, it is customary to express the abundance of oxygen in terms of the partial pressure of gaseous oxygen that would be in equilibrium with the blood. Using the independent-site model just presented, with only oxygen present, calculate and plot the fraction of occupied heme sites as a function of the partial pressure of oxygen. This curve is called the Langmuir adsorption isotherm ("isotherm" because it's for a fixed temperature). Experiments show that adsorption by myosin follows the shape of this curve quite accurately.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Fraction of occupied heme states as a function of partial pressure of oxygen is correctly calculated and plotted in graph to obtain the curve.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Formula

Gibb's Factor is given by formula:

Gibb'sFactor=e-[(E(s)-μN(s))kT]

Where, T is temperature, kis Boltzmann's constant,μis chemical potential, N(s)is number of state satoms, E(s)is statesenergy.

We consider the system as single donor atom. So, three cases are possible:

(1) Unoccupied state

Here, state energy and number of atoms are both equal to zero.

So, in formula (1) we put N=0and E=0.

So, localid="1647110725971" Gibb'sFactor=e-[(0-μ×0)kT]

localid="1647110803077" =e0

localid="1647110809090" =1

02

Step 2. Case Discussion

Second case possible is:

(2) States with two ionization

Here, state energy is -1and number of atoms is 1.

In formula (1) we put E=-1and N=1.

Gibb'sFactor=e-[(-1-μ)kT]

=e[(1+μ)kT]

The degeneracy is 2because there are two independent states of electron.

So, Gibb'sFactor=2e[(1+μ)kT]

So, grand partition function is:

Z=1+2e[(1+μ)kT]

03

Step 3. Potential Formula

We can say that probability of ionization of donor atom is:

Pion=1Z

We put Z=1+2e[(1+μ)kT]in above equation,

Pion=11+2e[(1+μ)kT]

Formula of chemical potential is:

localid="1647112562133" μ=-kT×lnVZinNνQ

We know that ideal gas equation is given by:

PV=N×k×T

So, VN=kTP

We put value of kTPas VNin above chemical potential formula:

So, μ=-kT×lnkTZinPνQ

So, e-μkT=kTZinPνQ

04

Step 4. Finding Probability

Heme site is occupied by Oxygen O2, the probability is:

P=e-(ε-μ)kTZ

In above formula we put localid="1647113657590" Z=1+e-(ε-μ)kT

localid="1647113747407" P=e-(ε-μ)kT1+e-(ε-μ)kT

=11+e(ε-μ)kT

=11+[e(ε)kT×e(-μ)kT]

In above equation we put, e(-μ)kT=kTZinPνQ

localid="1647114360985" P=11+[e(ε)kT×kTZinPνQ]

=11+PoP

We can write Po=kTZinνQ×eεkT

Therefore, Heme site is occupied by Oxygen O2Probability is:

P=11+kTZinPνQ×eεkT

05

Step 5. Calculation

For a box of width 1cm, we will find temperature at which translation motion of O2molecule freezes, the formula for quantum length is:

lQ=h2πmkT

Putting the values of variables in above expression, the volume is:

νQ=h2πmkT3

νQ=6.63×10-34J·s2π(32×1.66×10-27kg)(1.38×10-23J/K)(310K)3

=5.38×10-33m3

Now, we will calculate value of Po

Po=(1.38×10-23J/K)(310K)(223)(5.4×10-33m3)×e-0.7eV(8.617×10-5eV)(310K)

=738.33Pa1atm105pa

=0.00738atm

06

Step 6. Table and Graph

We make table for Pressure pagainst fraction of pressure PPo+P

P
PPo+P
1
0.9926
2
0.9963
3
0.9975
4
0.9981
5
0.9985
6
0.9987
7
0.9989
8
0.9990
9
0.9991
10
0.9992

We can now draw graph between fraction of occupied heme sites and oxygen partial pressure.

This graph curve is called Langmuir Adsorption Isotherm.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In a real hemoglobin molecule, the tendency of oxygen to bind to a heme site increases as the other three heme sites become occupied. To model this effect in a simple way, imagine that a hemoglobin molecule has just two sites, either or both of which can be occupied. This system has four possible states (with only oxygen present). Take the energy of the unoccupied state to be zero, the energies of the two singly occupied states to be -0.55eV, and the energy of the doubly occupied state to be -1.3eV(so the change in energy upon binding the second oxygen is -0.75eV). As in the previous problem, calculate and plot the fraction of occupied sites as a function of the effective partial pressure of oxygen. Compare to the graph from the previous problem (for independent sites). Can you think of why this behavior is preferable for the function of hemoglobin?

In this problem you will model helium-3 as a non-interacting Fermi gas. Although He3liquefies at low temperatures, the liquid has an unusually low density and behaves in many ways like a gas because the forces between the atoms are so weak. Helium-3 atoms are spin-1/2 fermions, because of the unpaired neutron in the nucleus.

(a) Pretending that liquid 3He is a non-interacting Fermi gas, calculate the Fermi energy and the Fermi temperature. The molar volume (at low pressures) is 37cm3

(b)Calculate the heat capacity for T<<Tf, and compare to the experimental result CV=(2.8K-1)NkT(in the low-temperature limit). (Don't expect perfect agreement.)

(c)The entropy of solid H3ebelow 1 K is almost entirely due to its multiplicity of nuclear spin alignments. Sketch a graph S vs. T for liquid and solid H3eat low temperature, and estimate the temperature at which the liquid and solid have the same entropy. Discuss the shape of the solid-liquid phase boundary shown in Figure 5.13.


Fill in the steps to derive equations 7.112and7.117.

For a system of particles at room temperature, how large must ϵ-μbe before the Fermi-Dirac, Bose-Einstein, and Boltzmann distributions agree within 1%? Is this condition ever violated for the gases in our atmosphere? Explain.

In addition to the cosmic background radiation of photons, the universe is thought to be permeated with a background radiation of neutrinos (v) and antineutrinos (v-), currently at an effective temperature of 1.95 K. There are three species of neutrinos, each of which has an antiparticle, with only one allowed polarisation state for each particle or antiparticle. For parts (a) through (c) below, assume that all three species are exactly massless

(a) It is reasonable to assume that for each species, the concentration of neutrinos equals the concentration of antineutrinos, so that their chemical potentials are equal: μν=μν¯. Furthermore, neutrinos and antineutrinos can be produced and annihilated in pairs by the reaction

ν+ν¯2γ

(where y is a photon). Assuming that this reaction is at equilibrium (as it would have been in the very early universe), prove that u =0 for both the neutrinos and the antineutrinos.

(b) If neutrinos are massless, they must be highly relativistic. They are also fermions: They obey the exclusion principle. Use these facts to derive a formula for the total energy density (energy per unit volume) of the neutrino-antineutrino background radiation. differences between this "neutrino gas" and a photon gas. Antiparticles still have positive energy, so to include the antineutrinos all you need is a factor of 2. To account for the three species, just multiply by 3.) To evaluate the final integral, first change to a dimensionless variable and then use a computer or look it up in a table or consult Appendix B. (Hint: There are very few

(c) Derive a formula for the number of neutrinos per unit volume in the neutrino background radiation. Evaluate your result numerically for the present neutrino temperature of 1.95 K.

d) It is possible that neutrinos have very small, but nonzero, masses. This wouldn't have affected the production of neutrinos in the early universe, when me would have been negligible compared to typical thermal energies. But today, the total mass of all the background neutrinos could be significant. Suppose, then, that just one of the three species of neutrinos (and the corresponding antineutrino) has a nonzero mass m. What would mc2 have to be (in eV), in order for the total mass of neutrinos in the universe to be comparable to the total mass of ordinary matter?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free