An atomic nucleus can be crudely modeled as a gas of nucleons with a number density of 0.18fm-3(where 1fm=10-15m). Because nucleons come in two different types (protons and neutrons), each with spin 1/2, each spatial wavefunction can hold four nucleons. Calculate the Fermi energy of this system, in MeV. Also calculate the Fermi temperature, and comment on the result.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The Fermi energy of the system is40.2MeV.

The Fermi temperature of the system is4.6632×1011K.

One would need lot of energy to excite those nucleons.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Given Information

We are given that the number density of gas of nucleons is 0.18fm-3.

We have to find the fermi energy of given system and the Fermi temperature.

02

Step 2. Atomic nucleous

An atomic nucleus can be modeled as a gas of nucleons with number density,

NV=0.18fm-3

Since the nucleons are fourfold degenerate, then the total number of occupied states will be,

N=4×(Volume of eigth-sphere)=41843πnmax3=23πnmax3

Rearranging the equation for nmax, we get

3N2π=nmax3nmax=3N2π13

03

Step 3. Finding the fermi energy of the system

The fermi energy of the system is given by,

εF=h2nmax28mL2

Putting nmax=3N2π13, we get

εF=h28mL23N2π23=h28mL3233N2π23=h28m32π·NV23

04

Step 4. Finding the fermi energy of the system

The mass of nucleon is,

m=1gNA

Here, NAis Avogadro's number.

Substituting 6.023×1023atoms/mol, we get

m=(1g)(1kg/1000g)6.023×1023=1.6603×10-27kg

The number density of nucleons in the gas is 0.18fm-3. Converting number density from fm to m-3.

NV=0.18fm-310-15mfm-3=0.18×1045m-3

Substituting the values, we get

localid="1647858933038" εF=6.625×10-34J·s281.6603×10-27kg32π230.18×1045m-32/3=6.4355×10-12J1eV1.6×10-19J=4.0223×107eV1MeV106eV=40.2MeV

Hence, the Fermi energy of the system is40.2MeV.

05

Step 5. Finding the fermi temperature

The Fermi temperature of the system is given by,

TF=EFkB

Putting εF=4.0223×107eVand

kB=8.617×10-5eV/K, we get

TF=4.0223×107eV8.617×10-5eV/K=4.6632×1011K

Hence, the Fermi temperature of the system is4.6632×1011Kand lot of energy is required to excite those nucleons.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider a gas of noninteracting spin-0 bosons at high temperatures, when TTc. (Note that “high” in this sense can still mean below 1 K.)

  1. Show that, in this limit, the Bose-Einstein function can be written approximately as
    n¯BE=e(μ)/kT[1+eμ/kT+].
  2. Keeping only the terms shown above, plug this result into equation 7.122 to derive the first quantum correction to the chemical potential for gas of bosons.
  3. Use the properties of the grand free energy (Problems 5.23 and 7.7) to show that the pressure of any system is given by In P=(kT/V), where Zis the grand partition function. Argue that, for gas of noninteracting particles, In Zcan be computed as the sum over all modes (or single-particle states) of In Zi, where Zi; is the grand partition function for the ithmode.
  4. Continuing with the result of part (c), write the sum over modes as an integral over energy, using the density of states. Evaluate this integral explicitly for gas of noninteracting bosons in the high-temperature limit, using the result of part (b) for the chemical potential and expanding the logarithm as appropriate. When the smoke clears, you should find
    p=NkTV(1NvQ42V),
    again neglecting higher-order terms. Thus, quantum statistics results in a lowering of the pressure of a boson gas, as one might expect.
  5. Write the result of part (d) in the form of the virial expansion introduced in Problem 1.17, and read off the second virial coefficient, B(T). Plot the predicted B(T)for a hypothetical gas of noninteracting helium-4 atoms.
  6. Repeat this entire problem for gas of spin-1/2 fermions. (Very few modifications are necessary.) Discuss the results, and plot the predicted virial coefficient for a hypothetical gas of noninteracting helium-3 atoms.

Most spin-1/2 fermions, including electrons and helium-3 atoms, have nonzero magnetic moments. A gas of such particles is therefore paramagnetic. Consider, for example, a gas of free electrons, confined inside a three-dimensional box. The z component of the magnetic moment of each electron is ±µa. In the presence of a magnetic field B pointing in the z direction, each "up" state acquires an additional energy of -μBB, while each "down" state acquires an additional energy of +μBB

(a) Explain why you would expect the magnetization of a degenerate electron gas to be substantially less than that of the electronic paramagnets studied in Chapters 3 and 6, for a given number of particles at a given field strength.

(b) Write down a formula for the density of states of this system in the presence of a magnetic field B, and interpret your formula graphically.

(c) The magnetization of this system is μBN-N, where Nr and N1 are the numbers of electrons with up and down magnetic moments, respectively. Find a formula for the magnetization of this system at T=0, in terms of N, µa, B, and the Fermi energy.

(d) Find the first temperature-dependent correction to your answer to part (c), in the limit TTF. You may assume that μBBkT; this implies that the presence of the magnetic field has negligible effect on the chemical potential μ. (To avoid confusing µB with µ, I suggest using an abbreviation such as o for the quantity µaB.)

Change variables in equation 7.83 to λ=hc/ϵ and thus derive a formula for the photon spectrum as a function of wavelength. Plot this spectrum, and find a numerical formula for the wavelength where the spectrum peaks, in terms of hc/kT. Explain why the peak does not occur at hc/(2.82kT).

A ferromagnet is a material (like iron) that magnetizes spontaneously, even in the absence of an externally applied magnetic field. This happens because each elementary dipole has a strong tendency to align parallel to its neighbors. At t=0the magnetization of a ferromagnet has the maximum possible value, with all dipoles perfectly lined up; if there are Natoms, the total magnetization is typically~2μeN, where µa is the Bohr magneton. At somewhat higher temperatures, the excitations take the form of spin waves, which can be visualized classically as shown in Figure 7.30. Like sound waves, spin waves are quantized: Each wave mode can have only integer multiples of a basic energy unit. In analogy with phonons, we think of the energy units as particles, called magnons. Each magnon reduces the total spin of the system by one unit of h21rand therefore reduces the magnetization by ~2μe. However, whereas the frequency of a sound wave is inversely proportional to its wavelength, the frequency of a spin-wave is proportional to the square of 1λ.. (in the limit of long wavelengths). Therefore, since=hfand p=hλ.. for any "particle," the energy of a magnon is proportional

In the ground state of a ferromagnet, all the elementary dipoles point in the same direction. The lowest-energy excitations above the ground state are spin waves, in which the dipoles precess in a conical motion. A long-wavelength spin wave carries very little energy because the difference in direction between neighboring dipoles is very small.

to the square of its momentum. In analogy with the energy-momentum relation for an ordinary nonrelativistic particle, we can write =p22pm*, wherem* is a constant related to the spin-spin interaction energy and the atomic spacing. For iron, m* turns out to equal 1.24×1029kg, about14times the mass of an electron. Another difference between magnons and phonons is that each magnon ( or spin-wave mode) has only one possible polarization.

(a) Show that at low temperatures, the number of magnons per unit volume in a three-dimensional ferromagnet is given by

NmV=2π2m×kTh2320xex-1dx.

Evaluate the integral numerically.

(b) Use the result of part (a) to find an expression for the fractional reduction in magnetization, (M(O)-M(T))/M(O).Write your answer in the form (T/To)32, and estimate the constantT0for iron.

(c) Calculate the heat capacity due to magnetic excitations in a ferromagnet at low temperature. You should find Cv/Nk=(T/Ti)32, where Tidiffers from To only by a numerical constant. EstimateTifor iron, and compare the magnon and phonon contributions to the heat capacity. (The Debye temperature of iron is 470k.)

(d) Consider a two-dimensional array of magnetic dipoles at low temperature. Assume that each elementary dipole can still point in any (threedimensional) direction, so spin waves are still possible. Show that the integral for the total number of magnons diverge in this case. (This result is an indication that there can be no spontaneous magnetization in such a two-dimensional system. However, in Section 8.2we will consider a different two-dimensional model in which magnetization does occur.)

Prove that the peak of the Planck spectrum is at x = 2.82.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free