A star that is too heavy to stabilize as a white dwarf can collapse further to form a neutron star: a star made entirely of neutrons, supported against gravitational collapse by degenerate neutron pressure. Repeat the steps of the previous problem for a neutron star, to determine the following: the mass radius relation; the radius, density, Fermi energy, and Fermi temperature of a one-solar-mass neutron star; and the critical mass above which a neutron star becomes relativistic and hence unstable to further collapse.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The mass radius relation is

R1M13

The radius is found to be 12410m.

The density of the white dwarf star is 2.5×1017kg/m3

The Fermi energy and temperature are 9×10-12J,6.5×1011K

The critical mass is given by,M=1.38×1031kg.

Step by step solution

01

Given information 

We have to calculate the, mass-radius relation; radius of star, density, Fermi energy and Fermi temperature of a one-solar-mass neutron star; and the critical mass above which a neutron star becomes relativistic and hence unstable to further collapse.

02

Simplify

we now that, the total energy of the white dwarf is given by,

U=Ukinetic+UgravU=(0.0086)h2M53memp53R2-35GM2R

Let us consider,

localid="1650022143628" α=(0.0086)h2M53memp53β=35GM2

Then, we can write, the energy as,

localid="1650022013208" U=αR2-βRdUdR=-2αR3+βR2=0R=0,R=2αβ

Substitute the value of α,βthen,

localid="1650022149205" R=2×(0.0086)h2M53memp5335GM2R=(0.0933)h2mp83G1M13

This is the drive relation-ship between the Radius and Mass.

After sustaining all the value,

localid="1650022153954" R=12410m

03

Step 3:Simplify

The density of the white dwarf is given by,

ρ=MVρ=M43(3.14)(R3)ρ=2.5×1017kg/m3

The Fermi energy is found out as ,

εf=h28me9M8mpπ2R323εf=(6.63×10-34J.s)28×9.1×10-31kg9×2×1030kg8×(1.67×10-27kg)π2×(12410m)323εf=9×10-12J

The Fermi temperature is

εf=KBTT=εfKBT=9×10-12j1.38×10-23J/KT=6.5×1011K

04

Simplify

For this the kinetic energy and the potential should needs to balance each other at some point.

Ukinetic=Ugrav(0.023)Mmp43hcR=3GM25R(0.023)(6.63×10-34J.s)(3×108m/s)(1.67×10-27kg)43=3GM235M=1.38×1031kg

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Starting from equation 7.83, derive a formula for the density of states of a photon gas (or any other gas of ultra relativistic particles having two polarisation states). Sketch this function.

The Sommerfeld expansion is an expansion in powers of kTεF, which is assumed to be small. In this section I kept all terms through order kTεF2, omitting higher-order terms. Show at each relevant step that the term proportional to localid="1650117451748" T3is zero, so that the next nonvanishing terms in the expansions forlocalid="1650117470867" μand localid="1650117476821" Uare proportional to localid="1650117458596" T4. (If you enjoy such things, you might try evaluating the localid="1650117464980" T4terms, possibly with the aid of a computer algebra program.)

The argument given above for why CvTdoes not depend on the details of the energy levels available to the fermions, so it should also apply to the model considered in Problem 7.16: a gas of fermions trapped in such a way that the energy levels are evenly spaced and non-degenerate.

(a) Show that, in this model, the number of possible system states for a given value of q is equal to the number of distinct ways of writing q as a sum of positive integers. (For example, there are three system states for q = 3, corresponding to the sums 3, 2 + 1, and 1 + 1 + 1. Note that 2 + 1 and 1 + 2 are not counted separately.) This combinatorial function is called the number of unrestricted partitions of q, denoted p(q). For example, p(3) = 3.

(b) By enumerating the partitions explicitly, compute p(7) and p(8).

(c) Make a table of p(q) for values of q up to 100, by either looking up the values in a mathematical reference book, or using a software package that can compute them, or writing your own program to compute them. From this table, compute the entropy, temperature, and heat capacity of this system, using the same methods as in Section 3.3. Plot the heat capacity as a function of temperature, and note that it is approximately linear.

(d) Ramanujan and Hardy (two famous mathematicians) have shown that when q is large, the number of unrestricted partitions of q is given approximately by

p(q)eπ2q343q

Check the accuracy of this formula for q = 10 and for q = 100. Working in this approximation, calculate the entropy, temperature, and heat capacity of this system. Express the heat. capacity as a series in decreasing powers of kT/η, assuming that this ratio is large and keeping the two largest terms. Compare to the numerical results you obtained in part (c). Why is the heat capacity of this system independent of N, unlike that of the three dimensional box of fermions discussed in the text?

(a) As usual when solving a problem on a computer, it's best to start by putting everything in terms of dimensionless variables. So define t=T/Tcc=μ/kTc,andx=ϵ/kTc. Express the integral that defines μ, equation 7.122, in terms of these variables. You should obtain the equation

(b) According to Figure 7.33, the correct value of cwhen T=2Tcis approximately -0.8. Plug in these values and check that the equation above is approximately satisfied.

(c) Now vary μ, holding Tfixed, to find the precise value of μfor . Repeat for values of T/Tcranging from 1.2up to 3.0, in increments of 0.2. Plot a graph of μas a function of temperature.

In addition to the cosmic background radiation of photons, the universe is thought to be permeated with a background radiation of neutrinos (v) and antineutrinos (v-), currently at an effective temperature of 1.95 K. There are three species of neutrinos, each of which has an antiparticle, with only one allowed polarisation state for each particle or antiparticle. For parts (a) through (c) below, assume that all three species are exactly massless

(a) It is reasonable to assume that for each species, the concentration of neutrinos equals the concentration of antineutrinos, so that their chemical potentials are equal: μν=μν¯. Furthermore, neutrinos and antineutrinos can be produced and annihilated in pairs by the reaction

ν+ν¯2γ

(where y is a photon). Assuming that this reaction is at equilibrium (as it would have been in the very early universe), prove that u =0 for both the neutrinos and the antineutrinos.

(b) If neutrinos are massless, they must be highly relativistic. They are also fermions: They obey the exclusion principle. Use these facts to derive a formula for the total energy density (energy per unit volume) of the neutrino-antineutrino background radiation. differences between this "neutrino gas" and a photon gas. Antiparticles still have positive energy, so to include the antineutrinos all you need is a factor of 2. To account for the three species, just multiply by 3.) To evaluate the final integral, first change to a dimensionless variable and then use a computer or look it up in a table or consult Appendix B. (Hint: There are very few

(c) Derive a formula for the number of neutrinos per unit volume in the neutrino background radiation. Evaluate your result numerically for the present neutrino temperature of 1.95 K.

d) It is possible that neutrinos have very small, but nonzero, masses. This wouldn't have affected the production of neutrinos in the early universe, when me would have been negligible compared to typical thermal energies. But today, the total mass of all the background neutrinos could be significant. Suppose, then, that just one of the three species of neutrinos (and the corresponding antineutrino) has a nonzero mass m. What would mc2 have to be (in eV), in order for the total mass of neutrinos in the universe to be comparable to the total mass of ordinary matter?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free