In Problem 7.28you found the density of states and the chemical potential for a two-dimensional Fermi gas. Calculate the heat capacity of this gas in the limit role="math" localid="1650099524353" kTεF· Also show that the heat capacity has the expected behavior when kTεF. Sketch the heat capacity as a function of temperature.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The heat capacity of the gas in the limit is CV=N(kπ)2T3εF.

The graph of heat capacity as a function of temperature is

Step by step solution

01

Given information

We have been given that the density of states and the chemical potential for a two-dimensional Fermi gas which we have found earlier in Problem 7.28isg(ε)=NεF.

We need to find the heat capacity of this gas in the limit kTεFand show that the heat capacity has the expected behavior when kTεF. Also we need to sketch the heat capacity as a function of temperature.

02

Simplify

The total energy is given by the following integral:

U=0εg(ε)n¯FD(ε)dε (Let this equation be (localid="1650103209259" 1))

We have found the energy density earlier in Problem 7.28such as

localid="1650102270353" g(ε)=NεF

Substitute the value of g(ε)in equation (localid="1650103517684" 1), we get:

U=NεF0εn¯FD(ε)dε

Integrating by parts, we get:

U=NεFε22n¯FD|0-NεF0ε22n¯FDεdε (Let this equation be (2))

If we substitute ε=0, the integral will become zero due to the dependence of the term on ε2and the first term vanishes.

The equation (2) reduces to :

U=-NεF0ε22n¯FDεdε (Let this equation be (3))

We know that n¯FD=1e(e-μ)kT+1

Taking derivative with respect to ε, we get:

localid="1650103912932" n¯FDε=1e(ε-μ)kT+1ε

n¯FDε=-1kTe(ε-μ)kT(e(ε-μ)kT+1)2

Let (ε-μ)kT=x, then we can write as:

dx=dεkT

We also need to change the boundaries of integration, so:

ε x

ε0 x-μkT

As kTμ, we can put -as the lower limit of integration.

The integral in equation (3) will become:

U=N2εF-ε2ex(ex+1)2dx (Let this equation be (localid="1650114310341" 4))

03

finding the values of integrals

Now expanding ε2about μusing Taylor series, we get:

ε2=μ2+2μ(ε-μ)x+(ε-μ)x2ε2=μ2+2μ(kTx)+(kTx)2

By substituting the value of in equation (4), we get three integrals say I1,I2,I3

The equation (4) will become:

U=N2εF[I1+I2+I3] (Let this equation be (5))

where,

I1=μ2-ex(ex+1)2dxI2=2kTμ-xex(ex+1)2dxI3=(kT)2-x2ex(ex+1)2dx

Simplifying the integrals I1,I2,I3, we get:

I1=μ2

The second integral is odd integral and the limits of integration are from to , so this integral is simply zero.

I2=0

I3=(kT)2π23=(kTπ)23

Substitute the values of in equation (5), we get:

U=N2εFμ2+(kTπ)23

Let μ=εF, we get:

U=N2εFεF2+(kTπ)23U=NεF2+N(kTπ)26εF

The heat capacity is the partial derivative of with respect to the temperature, that is:

CV=UTCV=NεF2+N(kTπ)26εFTCV=N(kπ)2T3εF

04

Graph

The graph of the heat capacity as a function of temperature is linear, where the slope of the line is Slope=N(kπ)23εF.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Sketch the heat capacity of copper as a function of temperature from 0to5K, showing the contributions of lattice vibrations and conduction electrons separately. At what temperature are these two contributions equal?

A black hole is a blackbody if ever there was one, so it should emit blackbody radiation, called Hawking radiation. A black hole of mass M has a total energy of Mc2, a surface area of 16πG2M2/c4, and a temperature ofhc3/16π2kGM(as shown in Problem 3.7).

(a) Estimate the typical wavelength of the Hawking radiation emitted by a one-solar-mass (2 x 1030 kg) black hole. Compare your answer to the size of the black hole.

(b) Calculate the total power radiated by a one-solar-mass black hole.

(c) Imagine a black hole in empty space, where it emits radiation but absorbs nothing. As it loses energy, its mass must decrease; one could say it "evaporates." Derive a differential equation for the mass as a function of time, and solve this equation to obtain an expression for the lifetime of a black hole in terms of its initial mass.

(d) Calculate the lifetime of a one-solar-mass black hole, and compare to the estimated age of the known universe (1010 years).

(e) Suppose that a black hole that was created early in the history of the universe finishes evaporating today. What was its initial mass? In what part of the electromagnetic spectrum would most of its radiation have been emitted?

When the attractive forces of the ions in a crystal are taken into account, the allowed electron energies are no longer given by the simple formula 7.36; instead, the allowed energies are grouped into bands, separated by gaps where there are no allowed energies. In a conductor the Fermi energy lies within one of the bands; in this section we have treated the electrons in this band as "free" particles confined to a fixed volume. In an insulator, on the other hand, the Fermi energy lies within a gap, so that at T = 0 the band below the gap is completely occupied while the band above the gap is unoccupied. Because there are no empty states close in energy to those that are occupied, the electrons are "stuck in place" and the material does not conduct electricity. A semiconductor is an insulator in which the gap is narrow enough for a few electrons to jump across it at room temperature. Figure 7 .17 shows the density of states in the vicinity of the Fermi energy for an idealized semiconductor, and defines some terminology and notation to be used in this problem.

(a) As a first approximation, let us model the density of states near the bottom of the conduction band using the same function as for a free Fermi gas, with an appropriate zero-point: g(ϵ)=g0ϵ-ϵc, where go is the same constant as in equation 7.51. Let us also model the density of states near the top

Figure 7.17. The periodic potential of a crystal lattice results in a densityof-states function consisting of "bands" (with many states) and "gaps" (with no states). For an insulator or a semiconductor, the Fermi energy lies in the middle of a gap so that at T = 0, the "valence band" is completely full while the-"conduction band" is completely empty. of the valence band as a mirror image of this function. Explain why, in this approximation, the chemical potential must always lie precisely in the middle of the gap, regardless of temperature.

(b) Normally the width of the gap is much greater than kT. Working in this limit, derive an expression for the number of conduction electrons per unit volume, in terms of the temperature and the width of the gap.

(c) For silicon near room temperature, the gap between the valence and conduction bands is approximately 1.11 eV. Roughly how many conduction electrons are there in a cubic centimeter of silicon at room temperature? How does this compare to the number of conduction electrons in a similar amount of copper?

( d) Explain why a semiconductor conducts electricity much better at higher temperatures. Back up your explanation with some numbers. (Ordinary conductors like copper, on the other hand, conduct better at low temperatures.) (e) Very roughly, how wide would the gap between the valence and conduction bands have to be in order to consider a material an insulator rather than a semiconductor?

Change variables in equation 7.83 to λ=hc/ϵ and thus derive a formula for the photon spectrum as a function of wavelength. Plot this spectrum, and find a numerical formula for the wavelength where the spectrum peaks, in terms of hc/kT. Explain why the peak does not occur at hc/(2.82kT).

The results of the previous problem can be used to explain why the current temperature of the cosmic neutrino background (Problem 7.48) is 1.95 K rather than 2.73 K. Originally the temperatures of the photons and the neutrinos would have been equal, but as the universe expanded and cooled, the interactions of neutrinos with other particles soon became negligibly weak. Shortly thereafter, the temperature dropped to the point where kT/c2 was no longer much greater than the electron mass. As the electrons and positrons disappeared during the next few minutes, they "heated" the photon radiation but not the neutrino radiation.

(a) Imagine that the universe has some finite total volume V, but that V is increasing with time. Write down a formula for the total entropy of the electrons, positrons, and photons as a function of V and T, using the auxiliary functions u(T) and f(T) introduced in the previous problem. Argue that this total entropy would have ben conserved in the early universe, assuming that no other species of particles interacted with these.

(b) The entropy of the neutrino radiation would have been separately conserved during this time period, because the neutrinos were unable to interact with anything. Use this fact to show that the neutrino temperature Tv and the photon temperature T are related by

TTν32π445+u(T)+f(T)=constant

as the universe expands and cools. Evaluate the constant by assuming that T=Tv when the temperatures are very high.

(c) Calculate the ratio T/Tv, in the limit of low temperature, to confirm that the present neutrino temperature should be 1.95 K.

(d) Use a computer to plot the ratio T/Tv, as a function of T, for kT/mc2ranging from 0 to 3.*

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free