Repeat the previous problem, taking into account the two independent spin states of the electron. Now the system has two "occupied" states, one with the electron in each spin configuration. However, the chemical potential of the electron gas is also slightly different. Show that the ratio of probabilities is the same as before: The spin degeneracy cancels out of the Saha equation.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Hence, the ratio of the probabilities is the same as before.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Given information 

As the system of a single Hydrogen atom/ion, basically has two possible states such as Unoccupied and occupied. Considering the two independent spin states of the electron, now the system has two occupied states one with the electron in each spin configuration.

02

Explanation

The Gibbs factor is given as:

P(s)=e-(ε-μ)/kT

Consider a system made up of a single hydrogen atom that can exist in three states, one of which is unoccupied and the other two of which are occupied (spin up and spin down):

Unoccupied state:

Because the chemical potential is 0 and the state's energy is also zero, the Gibbs factor is:

P(s)=e-(0-0)/kT=1

Occupied state (when the electron is in the ground state):

In this situation, replace εwith ionisation energy -I (notice that the factor is multiplied by two because we have two electrons):

P'(s)=2e(I+μ)/kT

The total of the two Gibbs factors is the Grand partition function, which is:

Ƶ=1+2e(I+μ)/kT

The Gibbs factor divided by the Grand partition function equals the probability of the first state (the ionised state, where the state is not occupied):

P(s)=P(s)Ƶ=11+2e(I+μ)/kT

The probability of the second state (when the state is occupied) equals the Gibbs factor divided by the Grand partition function:

P'(s)=P'(s)Ƶ=2e(I+μ)/kT1+2e(I+μ)/kT

03

Calculations

The ratio of probability of the unoccupied to the occupied states is therefore:

P(s)P'(s)=12e(I+μ)/kTP(s)P'(s)=12e-(I+μ)/kTP(s)P'(s)=12e-I/kTe-μ/kT(1)

The chemical equation is:

μ=-kTlnVZintNvQ

The volume per particle can be written as (from the ideal gas law):

VN=kTP

Therefore,

μ=-kTlnkTZintPvQ

Because we have two spin states in a monoatomic gas, the internal partition function is 2, hence the chemical potential can be reduced to:

μ=-kTln2kTPvQ-μkT=ln2kTPvQ

Exponentiation both sides:

e-μ/kT=2kTPvQ

Substitute into (1):

P(s)P'(s)=12e-I/kT2kTPvQP(s)P'(s)=e-I/kTkTPvQ

This is the same result of the previous problem, that means there is no effect on the fraction if we include the spin degeneracy.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider an isolated system of Nidentical fermions, inside a container where the allowed energy levels are nondegenerate and evenly spaced.* For instance, the fermions could be trapped in a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator potential. For simplicity, neglect the fact that fermions can have multiple spin orientations (or assume that they are all forced to have the same spin orientation). Then each energy level is either occupied or unoccupied, and any allowed system state can be represented by a column of dots, with a filled dot representing an occupied level and a hollow dot representing an unoccupied level. The lowest-energy system state has all levels below a certain point occupied, and all levels above that point unoccupied. Let ηbe the spacing between energy levels, and let be the number of energy units (each of size 11) in excess of the ground-state energy. Assume thatq<N. Figure 7 .8 shows all system states up to q=3.

(a) Draw dot diagrams, as in the figure, for all allowed system states with q=4,q=5,andq=6. (b) According to the fundamental assumption, all allowed system states with a given value of q are equally probable. Compute the probability of each energy level being occupied, for q=6. Draw a graph of this probability as a function of the energy of the level. ( c) In the thermodynamic limit where qis large, the probability of a level being occupied should be given by the Fermi-Dirac distribution. Even though 6 is not a large number, estimate the values of μand T that you would have to plug into the Fermi-Dirac distribution to best fit the graph you drew in part (b).

A representation of the system states of a fermionic sytern with evenly spaced, nondegen erate energy levels. A filled dot rep- resents an occupied single-particle state, while a hollow dot represents an unoccupied single-particle state . {d) Calculate the entropy of this system for each value of q from 0to6, and draw a graph of entropy vs. energy. Make a rough estimate of the slope of this graph near q=6, to obtain another estimate of the temperature of this system at that point. Check that it is in rough agreement with your answer to part ( c).

The heat capacity of liquid H4ebelow 0.6Kis proportional to T3, with the measured valueCV/Nk=(T/4.67K)3. This behavior suggests that the dominant excitations at low temperature are long-wavelength photons. The only important difference between photons in a liquid and photons in a solid is that a liquid cannot transmit transversely polarized waves-sound waves must be longitudinal. The speed of sound in liquid He4is 238m/s, and the density is 0.145g/cm3. From these numbers, calculate the photon contribution to the heat capacity ofHe4in the low-temperature limit, and compare to the measured value.

For a system of particles at room temperature, how large must ϵ-μbe before the Fermi-Dirac, Bose-Einstein, and Boltzmann distributions agree within 1%? Is this condition ever violated for the gases in our atmosphere? Explain.

For a brief time in the early universe, the temperature was hot enough to produce large numbers of electron-positron pairs. These pairs then constituted a third type of "background radiation," in addition to the photons and neutrinos (see Figure 7.21). Like neutrinos, electrons and positrons are fermions. Unlike neutrinos, electrons and positrons are known to be massive (ea.ch with the same mass), and each has two independent polarization states. During the time period of interest, the densities of electrons and positrons were approximately equal, so it is a good approximation to set the chemical potentials equal to zero as in Figure 7.21. When the temperature was greater than the electron mass times c2k, the universe was filled with three types of radiation: electrons and positrons (solid arrows); neutrinos (dashed); and photons (wavy). Bathed in this radiation were a few protons and neutrons, roughly one for every billion radiation particles. the previous problem. Recall from special relativity that the energy of a massive particle is ϵ=(pc)2+mc22.

(a) Show that the energy density of electrons and positrons at temperature Tis given by

u(T)=0x2x2+mc2/kT2ex2+mc2/kT2+1dx;whereu(T)=0x2x2+mc2/kT2ex2+mc2/kT2+1dx

(b) Show that u(T)goes to zero when kTmc2, and explain why this is a

reasonable result.

( c) Evaluate u(T)in the limit kTmc2, and compare to the result of the

the previous problem for the neutrino radiation.

(d) Use a computer to calculate and plot u(T)at intermediate temperatures.

(e) Use the method of Problem 7.46, part (d), to show that the free energy

density of the electron-positron radiation is

FV=-16π(kT)4(hc)3f(T);wheref(T)=0x2ln1+e-x2+mc2/kT2dx

Evaluate f(T)in both limits, and use a computer to calculate and plot f(T)at intermediate

temperatures.

(f) Write the entropy of the electron-positron radiation in terms of the functions

uTand f(T). Evaluate the entropy explicitly in the high-T limit.

In addition to the cosmic background radiation of photons, the universe is thought to be permeated with a background radiation of neutrinos (v) and antineutrinos (v-), currently at an effective temperature of 1.95 K. There are three species of neutrinos, each of which has an antiparticle, with only one allowed polarisation state for each particle or antiparticle. For parts (a) through (c) below, assume that all three species are exactly massless

(a) It is reasonable to assume that for each species, the concentration of neutrinos equals the concentration of antineutrinos, so that their chemical potentials are equal: μν=μν¯. Furthermore, neutrinos and antineutrinos can be produced and annihilated in pairs by the reaction

ν+ν¯2γ

(where y is a photon). Assuming that this reaction is at equilibrium (as it would have been in the very early universe), prove that u =0 for both the neutrinos and the antineutrinos.

(b) If neutrinos are massless, they must be highly relativistic. They are also fermions: They obey the exclusion principle. Use these facts to derive a formula for the total energy density (energy per unit volume) of the neutrino-antineutrino background radiation. differences between this "neutrino gas" and a photon gas. Antiparticles still have positive energy, so to include the antineutrinos all you need is a factor of 2. To account for the three species, just multiply by 3.) To evaluate the final integral, first change to a dimensionless variable and then use a computer or look it up in a table or consult Appendix B. (Hint: There are very few

(c) Derive a formula for the number of neutrinos per unit volume in the neutrino background radiation. Evaluate your result numerically for the present neutrino temperature of 1.95 K.

d) It is possible that neutrinos have very small, but nonzero, masses. This wouldn't have affected the production of neutrinos in the early universe, when me would have been negligible compared to typical thermal energies. But today, the total mass of all the background neutrinos could be significant. Suppose, then, that just one of the three species of neutrinos (and the corresponding antineutrino) has a nonzero mass m. What would mc2 have to be (in eV), in order for the total mass of neutrinos in the universe to be comparable to the total mass of ordinary matter?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free