Repeat the previous problem, taking into account the two independent spin states of the electron. Now the system has two "occupied" states, one with the electron in each spin configuration. However, the chemical potential of the electron gas is also slightly different. Show that the ratio of probabilities is the same as before: The spin degeneracy cancels out of the Saha equation.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Hence, the ratio of the probabilities is the same as before.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Given information 

As the system of a single Hydrogen atom/ion, basically has two possible states such as Unoccupied and occupied. Considering the two independent spin states of the electron, now the system has two occupied states one with the electron in each spin configuration.

02

Explanation

The Gibbs factor is given as:

P(s)=e-(ε-μ)/kT

Consider a system made up of a single hydrogen atom that can exist in three states, one of which is unoccupied and the other two of which are occupied (spin up and spin down):

Unoccupied state:

Because the chemical potential is 0 and the state's energy is also zero, the Gibbs factor is:

P(s)=e-(0-0)/kT=1

Occupied state (when the electron is in the ground state):

In this situation, replace εwith ionisation energy -I (notice that the factor is multiplied by two because we have two electrons):

P'(s)=2e(I+μ)/kT

The total of the two Gibbs factors is the Grand partition function, which is:

Ƶ=1+2e(I+μ)/kT

The Gibbs factor divided by the Grand partition function equals the probability of the first state (the ionised state, where the state is not occupied):

P(s)=P(s)Ƶ=11+2e(I+μ)/kT

The probability of the second state (when the state is occupied) equals the Gibbs factor divided by the Grand partition function:

P'(s)=P'(s)Ƶ=2e(I+μ)/kT1+2e(I+μ)/kT

03

Calculations

The ratio of probability of the unoccupied to the occupied states is therefore:

P(s)P'(s)=12e(I+μ)/kTP(s)P'(s)=12e-(I+μ)/kTP(s)P'(s)=12e-I/kTe-μ/kT(1)

The chemical equation is:

μ=-kTlnVZintNvQ

The volume per particle can be written as (from the ideal gas law):

VN=kTP

Therefore,

μ=-kTlnkTZintPvQ

Because we have two spin states in a monoatomic gas, the internal partition function is 2, hence the chemical potential can be reduced to:

μ=-kTln2kTPvQ-μkT=ln2kTPvQ

Exponentiation both sides:

e-μ/kT=2kTPvQ

Substitute into (1):

P(s)P'(s)=12e-I/kT2kTPvQP(s)P'(s)=e-I/kTkTPvQ

This is the same result of the previous problem, that means there is no effect on the fraction if we include the spin degeneracy.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

At the surface of the sun, the temperature is approximately 5800 K.

(a) How much energy is contained in the electromagnetic radiation filling a cubic meter of space at the sun's surface?

(b) Sketch the spectrum of this radiation as a function of photon energy. Mark the region of the spectrum that corresponds to visible wavelengths, between 400 nm and 700 nm.

(c) What fraction of the energy is in the visible portion of the spectrum? (Hint: Do the integral numerically.)

If you have a computer system that can do numerical integrals, it's not particularly difficult to evaluate μfor T>Tc.

(a) As usual when solving a problem on a computer, it's best to start by putting everything in terms dimensionless variables. So define t=T/Tc,c=μ/kTc,andx=ϵ/kTc. Express the integral that defines μ, equation N=0g(ϵ)1e(ϵ-μ)/kT-1dϵ, in terms of these variables, you should obtain the equation

2.315=0xdxe(x-c)/t-1

(b) According to given figure , the correct value of cwhen T=2Tc, is approximately -0.8. Plug in these values and check that the equation above is approximately satisfied.

(c) Now vary μ, holding Tfixed, to find the precise value of μfor T=2Tc. Repeat for values ofT/Tcranging from 1.2up to 3.0, in increments of 0.2. Plot a graph of μas a function of temperature.

The Sommerfeld expansion is an expansion in powers of kTεF, which is assumed to be small. In this section I kept all terms through order kTεF2, omitting higher-order terms. Show at each relevant step that the term proportional to localid="1650117451748" T3is zero, so that the next nonvanishing terms in the expansions forlocalid="1650117470867" μand localid="1650117476821" Uare proportional to localid="1650117458596" T4. (If you enjoy such things, you might try evaluating the localid="1650117464980" T4terms, possibly with the aid of a computer algebra program.)

For a brief time in the early universe, the temperature was hot enough to produce large numbers of electron-positron pairs. These pairs then constituted a third type of "background radiation," in addition to the photons and neutrinos (see Figure 7.21). Like neutrinos, electrons and positrons are fermions. Unlike neutrinos, electrons and positrons are known to be massive (ea.ch with the same mass), and each has two independent polarization states. During the time period of interest, the densities of electrons and positrons were approximately equal, so it is a good approximation to set the chemical potentials equal to zero as in Figure 7.21. When the temperature was greater than the electron mass times c2k, the universe was filled with three types of radiation: electrons and positrons (solid arrows); neutrinos (dashed); and photons (wavy). Bathed in this radiation were a few protons and neutrons, roughly one for every billion radiation particles. the previous problem. Recall from special relativity that the energy of a massive particle is ϵ=(pc)2+mc22.

(a) Show that the energy density of electrons and positrons at temperature Tis given by

u(T)=0x2x2+mc2/kT2ex2+mc2/kT2+1dx;whereu(T)=0x2x2+mc2/kT2ex2+mc2/kT2+1dx

(b) Show that u(T)goes to zero when kTmc2, and explain why this is a

reasonable result.

( c) Evaluate u(T)in the limit kTmc2, and compare to the result of the

the previous problem for the neutrino radiation.

(d) Use a computer to calculate and plot u(T)at intermediate temperatures.

(e) Use the method of Problem 7.46, part (d), to show that the free energy

density of the electron-positron radiation is

FV=-16π(kT)4(hc)3f(T);wheref(T)=0x2ln1+e-x2+mc2/kT2dx

Evaluate f(T)in both limits, and use a computer to calculate and plot f(T)at intermediate

temperatures.

(f) Write the entropy of the electron-positron radiation in terms of the functions

uTand f(T). Evaluate the entropy explicitly in the high-T limit.

Suppose that the concentration of infrared-absorbing gases in earth's atmosphere were to double, effectively creating a second "blanket" to warm the surface. Estimate the equilibrium surface temperature of the earth that would result from this catastrophe. (Hint: First show that the lower atmospheric blanket is warmer than the upper one by a factor of 21/4. The surface is warmer than the lower blanket by a smaller factor.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free