Consider the electromagnetic radiation inside a kiln, with a volume of V= I m3 and a temperature of 1500 K.

(a) What is the total energy of this radiation?

(b) Sketch the spectrum of the radiation as a function of photon energy.

(c) What fraction of all the energy is in the visible portion of the spectrum, with wavelengths between 400 nm and 700 nm?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Therefore, the total energy of this radiation is:

U=3.815×10-3J

Fraction of all energy isUvis.Utot.=0.000557

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The electromagnetic radiation inside a kiln, with a volume of V=I m3 and a temperature of 1500 K.

02

Explanation

(a) Suppose we have an electromagnetic radiation inside a kiln, which has a volume of V = 1 m3 and temperature of T = 1500 K, the total energy of this radiation is given by:

U=8π5(kT)415(hc)3V

Substitute with the values,

U=8π51.38×10-23J/K(1500K)4156.626×10-34J·s3.0×108m/s31m3U=3.815×10-3J

(b) The radiation's spectrum is provided by:

u(ϵ)=8π(hc)3ϵ3eϵ/kT-1

Using python and the code is:

From the graph we can see that the peak occurs at energy of ϵ=0.36eV

03

Explanation

(c) Now we need to discover the component of the spectrum that represents visible light (the fraction of the energy), which we can do by integrating the following equation all across the visible light (equation 785):

U=8πV(hc)3ϵ1ϵ2x3ex-1dx

The energy in terms of wavelength is:

ϵ=hcλ

Therefore,

ϵ2=6.626×10-34J·s3.0×108m/s400×10-9m=4.9695×10-19J=3.1eVϵ1=6.626×10-34J·s3.0×108m/s700×10-9m=2.84×10-19J=1.77eV

The fraction of the energy in the visible light is given by:

Uvis.Utot.=1.77eV3.1eVx3ex-1dx0x3ex-1dx

The integration in the denominator equals π4/15, therefore

Uvis.Utot=15π41.77eV3.1eVx3ex-1dϵ

But this is not the real boundaries since the integration over x not ϵ, we have:

x=ϵkT

But temperature T=1500K

localid="1647756536663">x1=ϵ1kT=1.77eV8.62×10-5eV/K(1500K)=13.7x2=ϵ2kT=3.1eVeV8.62×10-5eV/K(1500K)=24

Therefore, the integral will be:

Uvis.Utot.=15π413.724x3ex-1dϵ

To solve this integral python is used, the code is and the ratio is:

Uvis.Utot.=0.000557

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A white dwarf star (see Figure 7.12) is essentially a degenerate electron gas, with a bunch of nuclei mixed in to balance the charge and to provide the gravitational attraction that holds the star together. In this problem you will derive a relation between the mass and the radius of a white dwarf star, modeling the star as a uniform-density sphere. White dwarf stars tend to be extremely hot by our standards; nevertheless, it is an excellent approximation in this problem to set T=0.

(a) Use dimensional analysis to argue that the gravitational potential energy of a uniform-density sphere (mass M, radius R) must equal

Ugrav=-(constant)GM2R

where (constant) is some numerical constant. Be sure to explain the minus sign. The constant turns out to equal 3/5; you can derive it by calculating the (negative) work needed to assemble the sphere, shell by shell, from the inside out.

(b) Assuming that the star contains one proton and one neutron for each electron, and that the electrons are nonrelativistic, show that the total (kinetic) energy of the degenerate electrons equals

Ukinetic=(0.0086)h2M53memp53R2

Figure 7.12. The double star system Sirius A and B. Sirius A (greatly overexposed in the photo) is the brightest star in our night sky. Its companion, Sirius B, is hotter but very faint, indicating that it must be extremely small-a white dwarf. From the orbital motion of the pair we know that Sirius B has about the same mass as our sun. (UCO /Lick Observatory photo.)

( c) The equilibrium radius of the white dwarf is that which minimizes the total energy Ugravity+Ukinetic· Sketch the total energy as a function of R, and find a formula for the equilibrium radius in terms of the mass. As the mass increases, does the radius increase or decrease? Does this make sense?

( d) Evaluate the equilibrium radius for M=2×1030kg, the mass of the sun. Also evaluate the density. How does the density compare to that of water?

( e) Calculate the Fermi energy and the Fermi temperature, for the case considered in part (d). Discuss whether the approximation T = 0 is valid.

(f) Suppose instead that the electrons in the white dwarf star are highly relativistic. Using the result of the previous problem, show that the total kinetic energy of the electrons is now proportional to 1 / R instead of 1R2• Argue that there is no stable equilibrium radius for such a star.

(g) The transition from the nonrelativistic regime to the ultra relativistic regime occurs approximately where the average kinetic energy of an electron is equal to its rest energy, mc2Is the nonrelativistic approximation valid for a one-solar-mass white dwarf? Above what mass would you expect a white dwarf to become relativistic and hence unstable?

The heat capacity of liquid H4ebelow 0.6Kis proportional to T3, with the measured valueCV/Nk=(T/4.67K)3. This behavior suggests that the dominant excitations at low temperature are long-wavelength photons. The only important difference between photons in a liquid and photons in a solid is that a liquid cannot transmit transversely polarized waves-sound waves must be longitudinal. The speed of sound in liquid He4is 238m/s, and the density is 0.145g/cm3. From these numbers, calculate the photon contribution to the heat capacity ofHe4in the low-temperature limit, and compare to the measured value.

Although the integrals (7.53and 7.54) forNand Ucannot be

carried out analytically for all T, it's not difficult to evaluate them numerically

using a computer. This calculation has little relevance for electrons in metals (for

which the limit kT<<EFis always sufficient), but it is needed for liquid H3eand

for astrophysical systems like the electrons at the center of the sun.

(a) As a warm-up exercise, evaluate theNintegral (7.53) for the casekT=εF

and μ=0, and check that your answer is consistent with the graph shown

above. (Hint: As always when solving a problem on a computer, it's best to

first put everything in terms of dimensionless variables. So let t=kTεFrole="math" localid="1649996205331" ,c=μεF

, and x=εkT. Rewrite everything in terms of these variables,

and then put it on the computer.)

(b) The next step is to varyμ holdingT fixed, until the integral works out to

the desired value,N. Do this for values of kTεFranging from 0.1 up to 2,

and plot the results to reproduce Figure7.16. (It's probably not a good idea

to try to use numerical methods when kTεF is much smaller than 0.1, since

you can start getting overflow errors from exponentiating large numbers.

But this is the region where we've already solved the problem analytically.)

(c) Plug your calculated values ofµ into the energy integral (7.54), and evaluate

that integral numerically to obtain the energy as a function of temperature

forkTup to 2εF Plot the results, and evaluate the slope to obtain the

heat capacity. Check that the heat capacity has the expected behavior at

both low and high temperatures.

In addition to the cosmic background radiation of photons, the universe is thought to be permeated with a background radiation of neutrinos (v) and antineutrinos (v-), currently at an effective temperature of 1.95 K. There are three species of neutrinos, each of which has an antiparticle, with only one allowed polarisation state for each particle or antiparticle. For parts (a) through (c) below, assume that all three species are exactly massless

(a) It is reasonable to assume that for each species, the concentration of neutrinos equals the concentration of antineutrinos, so that their chemical potentials are equal: μν=μν¯. Furthermore, neutrinos and antineutrinos can be produced and annihilated in pairs by the reaction

ν+ν¯2γ

(where y is a photon). Assuming that this reaction is at equilibrium (as it would have been in the very early universe), prove that u =0 for both the neutrinos and the antineutrinos.

(b) If neutrinos are massless, they must be highly relativistic. They are also fermions: They obey the exclusion principle. Use these facts to derive a formula for the total energy density (energy per unit volume) of the neutrino-antineutrino background radiation. differences between this "neutrino gas" and a photon gas. Antiparticles still have positive energy, so to include the antineutrinos all you need is a factor of 2. To account for the three species, just multiply by 3.) To evaluate the final integral, first change to a dimensionless variable and then use a computer or look it up in a table or consult Appendix B. (Hint: There are very few

(c) Derive a formula for the number of neutrinos per unit volume in the neutrino background radiation. Evaluate your result numerically for the present neutrino temperature of 1.95 K.

d) It is possible that neutrinos have very small, but nonzero, masses. This wouldn't have affected the production of neutrinos in the early universe, when me would have been negligible compared to typical thermal energies. But today, the total mass of all the background neutrinos could be significant. Suppose, then, that just one of the three species of neutrinos (and the corresponding antineutrino) has a nonzero mass m. What would mc2 have to be (in eV), in order for the total mass of neutrinos in the universe to be comparable to the total mass of ordinary matter?

The results of the previous problem can be used to explain why the current temperature of the cosmic neutrino background (Problem 7.48) is 1.95 K rather than 2.73 K. Originally the temperatures of the photons and the neutrinos would have been equal, but as the universe expanded and cooled, the interactions of neutrinos with other particles soon became negligibly weak. Shortly thereafter, the temperature dropped to the point where kT/c2 was no longer much greater than the electron mass. As the electrons and positrons disappeared during the next few minutes, they "heated" the photon radiation but not the neutrino radiation.

(a) Imagine that the universe has some finite total volume V, but that V is increasing with time. Write down a formula for the total entropy of the electrons, positrons, and photons as a function of V and T, using the auxiliary functions u(T) and f(T) introduced in the previous problem. Argue that this total entropy would have ben conserved in the early universe, assuming that no other species of particles interacted with these.

(b) The entropy of the neutrino radiation would have been separately conserved during this time period, because the neutrinos were unable to interact with anything. Use this fact to show that the neutrino temperature Tv and the photon temperature T are related by

TTν32π445+u(T)+f(T)=constant

as the universe expands and cools. Evaluate the constant by assuming that T=Tv when the temperatures are very high.

(c) Calculate the ratio T/Tv, in the limit of low temperature, to confirm that the present neutrino temperature should be 1.95 K.

(d) Use a computer to plot the ratio T/Tv, as a function of T, for kT/mc2ranging from 0 to 3.*

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free