In the text I claimed that the universe was filled with ionised gas until its temperature cooled to about 3000 K. To see why, assume that the universe contains only photons and hydrogen atoms, with a constant ratio of 109 photons per hydrogen atom. Calculate and plot the fraction of atoms that were ionised as a function of temperature, for temperatures between 0 and 6000 K. How does the result change if the ratio of photons to atoms is 108 or 1010? (Hint: Write everything in terms of dimensionless variables such as t = kT/I, where I is the ionisation energy of hydrogen.)

Short Answer

Expert verified

The fraction of atoms that were ionised as a function of temperature isf=-1+1+45.245×10-7(α)t3/2e1/t25.245×10-7(α)t3/2e1/t

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The universe was filled with ionised gas until its temperature cooled to about 3000K.

Assume that the universe contains only photons and hydrogen atoms, with a constant ratio of 109 photons per hydrogen atom.

02

Explanation

If f is the fraction of atoms that are ionised, then the proportion of ionised to non-ionised atoms is:

f=NpNp+NH(1)

Where Np is number of protons and these are ionised hydrogen.

The equation is:

NpNeNH=VvQe-I/kT

For each proton there is an electron so Ne=Np, hence the equation becomes:

Np2NH=VvQe-I/kT(2)

The number of photographs multiplied by a factor (say α) equals the number of ionised hydrogen atoms plus the number of un-ionised hydrogen atoms:

Np+NH=αNγ

Where Nγis the number of photons and is given by:

Nγ=8π(2.404)VkThc3

Thus,

Np+NH=αbVkThc3(3)

Substitute into (1)

Np=fNp+NHNp=fαbVkThc3(4)

Substitute int (3):

fαbVkThc3+NH=αbVkThc3NH=(1-f)αbVkThc3

Substitute from (5) and (4) into (2):

fαbVkThc32(1-f)αbVkThc3=VvQe-I/kTfαbkThc3(1-f)=1vQe-I/kTf2αbkThc3vQeI/kT=1-f(6)

Let

β=αbkThc3vQeI/kTwherevQ=h22πmkT3/2β=αbkT2πmc23/2eI/kT

Therefore,

βf2=1-fβf2+f-1=0

This is a quadratic equation.

03

Explanation:

The solution for quadratic equation is:

f=-1+1+4β2β(7)

Since we need to plot this equation, we need to change the variables into dimensionless variables, substituting the values

t=kTI

Then

β=αbIt2πmc23/2e1/tβ=αbI2πmc23/2t3/2e1/t

Substitute the given values to find the constant:

β=8π(2.404)(α)13.6×1.6×10-19J2π9.11×10-31kg3.0×108m/s23/2t3/2e1/tβ=5.245×10-7(α)t3/2e1/t

Substitute into (7)

f=-1+1+45.245×10-7(α)t3/2e1/t25.245×10-7(α)t3/2e1/t

This formula can be plot first forα=10-9then for10-8and10-10on same graph using python. The code is:

The graph is:

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Use the formula P=-(U/V)S,N to show that the pressure of a photon gas is 1/3 times the energy density (U/V). Compute the pressure exerted by the radiation inside a kiln at 1500 K, and compare to the ordinary gas pressure exerted by the air. Then compute the pressure of the radiation at the centre of the sun, where the temperature is 15 million K. Compare to the gas pressure of the ionised hydrogen, whose density is approximately 105 kg/m3.

For a system obeying Boltzmann statistics, we know what μis from Chapter 6. Suppose, though, that you knew the distribution function (equation 7.31) but didn't know μ. You could still determine μ by requiring that the total number of particles, summed over all single-particle states, equal N. Carry out this calculation, to rederive the formula μ=-kTlnZ1/N. (This is normally how μ is determined in quantum statistics, although the math is usually more difficult.)

Consider a system consisting of a single impurity atom/ion in a semiconductor. Suppose that the impurity atom has one "extra" electron compared to the neighboring atoms, as would a phosphorus atom occupying a lattice site in a silicon crystal. The extra electron is then easily removed, leaving behind a positively charged ion. The ionized electron is called a conduction electron, because it is free to move through the material; the impurity atom is called a donor, because it can "donate" a conduction electron. This system is analogous to the hydrogen atom considered in the previous two problems except that the ionization energy is much less, mainly due to the screening of the ionic charge by the dielectric behavior of the medium.

Repeat the previous problem, taking into account the two independent spin states of the electron. Now the system has two "occupied" states, one with the electron in each spin configuration. However, the chemical potential of the electron gas is also slightly different. Show that the ratio of probabilities is the same as before: The spin degeneracy cancels out of the Saha equation.

Consider a gas of nidentical spin-0 bosons confined by an isotropic three-dimensional harmonic oscillator potential. (In the rubidium experiment discussed above, the confining potential was actually harmonic, though not isotropic.) The energy levels in this potential are ε=nhf, where nis any nonnegative integer and fis the classical oscillation frequency. The degeneracy of level nis(n+1)(n+2)/2.

(a) Find a formula for the density of states, g(ε), for an atom confined by this potential. (You may assume n>>1.)

(b) Find a formula for the condensation temperature of this system, in terms of the oscillation frequency f.

(c) This potential effectively confines particles inside a volume of roughly the cube of the oscillation amplitude. The oscillation amplitude, in turn, can be estimated by setting the particle's total energy (of order kT) equal to the potential energy of the "spring." Making these associations, and neglecting all factors of 2 and πand so on, show that your answer to part (b) is roughly equivalent to the formula derived in the text for the condensation temperature of bosons confined inside a box with rigid walls.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free