In addition to the cosmic background radiation of photons, the universe is thought to be permeated with a background radiation of neutrinos (v) and antineutrinos (v-), currently at an effective temperature of 1.95 K. There are three species of neutrinos, each of which has an antiparticle, with only one allowed polarisation state for each particle or antiparticle. For parts (a) through (c) below, assume that all three species are exactly massless

(a) It is reasonable to assume that for each species, the concentration of neutrinos equals the concentration of antineutrinos, so that their chemical potentials are equal: μν=μν¯. Furthermore, neutrinos and antineutrinos can be produced and annihilated in pairs by the reaction

ν+ν¯2γ

(where y is a photon). Assuming that this reaction is at equilibrium (as it would have been in the very early universe), prove that u =0 for both the neutrinos and the antineutrinos.

(b) If neutrinos are massless, they must be highly relativistic. They are also fermions: They obey the exclusion principle. Use these facts to derive a formula for the total energy density (energy per unit volume) of the neutrino-antineutrino background radiation. differences between this "neutrino gas" and a photon gas. Antiparticles still have positive energy, so to include the antineutrinos all you need is a factor of 2. To account for the three species, just multiply by 3.) To evaluate the final integral, first change to a dimensionless variable and then use a computer or look it up in a table or consult Appendix B. (Hint: There are very few

(c) Derive a formula for the number of neutrinos per unit volume in the neutrino background radiation. Evaluate your result numerically for the present neutrino temperature of 1.95 K.

d) It is possible that neutrinos have very small, but nonzero, masses. This wouldn't have affected the production of neutrinos in the early universe, when me would have been negligible compared to typical thermal energies. But today, the total mass of all the background neutrinos could be significant. Suppose, then, that just one of the three species of neutrinos (and the corresponding antineutrino) has a nonzero mass m. What would mc2 have to be (in eV), in order for the total mass of neutrinos in the universe to be comparable to the total mass of ordinary matter?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Hence proved that μv=μv¯=0

Step by step solution

01

Given information

In addition to the cosmic background radiation of photons, the universe is thought to be permeated with a background radiation of neutrinos (v) and antineutrinos (v-), currently at an effective temperature of 1.95 K. There are three species of neutrinos, each of which has an antiparticle, with only one allowed polarisation state for each particle or antiparticle. For parts (a) through (c) below, assume that all three species are exactly massless.

02

Explanation

(a) In two pairs of photons, neutrinos and antineutrinos can be annihilated as follows:

v+v¯2γ

In terms of chemical potentials, the equilibrium condition for this reaction is:

μv+μv¯=2μγ

Assume that the number of neutrinos in each species equals the number of antineutrinos, and that their chemical potentials are equal μv=μv¯and that the chemical potential of the photon is zero, as explained on page 290.

μv=μv¯=0

(b)The Fermi Dirac distribution, but with zero chemical potential, gives the likelihood of any single state being occupied by a neutrino:

n¯FD=1eϵ/kT+1

The total energy equals the sum over the energies multiplied by their probabilities, that is:

U=3·2nxnynzϵn¯FD

Now, factor 2 comes from the fact that anti matter (neutrinos and antineutrinos) exists, and factor 3 comes from the fact that we have three spices. Consider a cubic box with a volume of V and a side width of L. The permitted energy for neutrinos is:

ϵ=hcn2L

Hence,

U=6nx,ny,nzϵeϵ/kT+1U=6nx,ny,nzhcn/2Lehcn/2LkT+1

We must now convert the total to an integral in spherical coordinates, which we may do by multiplying it by the spherical integration factor n2sin(θ)so:

U=60π/2dΦ0π/2sin(θ)dθ0(hc/2L)n3ehcn/2LkT+1dn

The first two integrals are easy to evaluate, and they give a factor of π/2, so:

U=3π0(hc/2L)n3ehcn/2LkT+1dn

03

Calculation

Let,

x=hcn2LkTdx=hc2LkTdn

Hence,

U=3π2LkThc4hc2L0x3ex+1dxU=3π2Lhc3(kT)40x3ex+1dx

The integral is given as:

0x3ex+1dx=7π4120

Thus,

U=3π2Lhc3(kT)47π4120

Volume of box is V=L3

U=24πV(kT)4(hc)37π4120UV=7π5(kT)45(hc)3

(c)The number of neutrinos can be computed in the same way as the number of protons, but without the factor ε, yielding:

N=60π/2dΦ0π/2sin(θ)dθ0(hc/2L)n3ehcn/2LkT+1dn

The first two integrals are easy to evaluate, and they give a factor of π/2, so:

N=3π0n2ehcn/2LkT+1dn

Let,

x=hcn2LkTdx=hc2LkTdn

Thus,

N=3π2LkThc30x2ex+1dx

The value of the integral is 1.803, hence

N=3(1.803)π2LkThc3

Volume of the box is V=L3

NV=24(1.803)πkThc3NV=(135.94)kThc3

At temperature of 1 = 1.94 K, the number of neutrinos per unit volume is:

NV=(135.94)1.38×10-23J/K(1.94K)6.626×10-34J·s3.0×108m/s3NV=3.321×108m-3

04

Explanation

(d)Assuming that there is only one type of neutrino, the number of neutrinos per unit volume is one-third of what we computed in the preceding section, i.e.

NV=1.1×108m-3

The average density of the universe is one proton per cubic metre, and the energy of this proton in eV is mpc2=1.0×109eV per cubic metre, hence the neutrino's energy should be:

mnc2=1.0×109m-31.1×108m-3mnc2=11eV

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose you have a "box" in which each particle may occupy any of 10single-particle states. For simplicity, assume that each of these states has energy zero.

(a) What is the partition function of this system if the box contains only one particle?

(b) What is the partition function of this system if the box contains two distinguishable particles?

(c) What is the partition function if the box contains two identical bosons?

(d) What is the partition function if the box contains two identical fermions?

(e) What would be the partition function of this system according to equation 7.16?

(f) What is the probability of finding both particles in the same single particle state, for the three cases of distinguishable particles, identical bosom, and identical fermions?

Sketch the heat capacity of copper as a function of temperature from 0to5K, showing the contributions of lattice vibrations and conduction electrons separately. At what temperature are these two contributions equal?

A star that is too heavy to stabilize as a white dwarf can collapse further to form a neutron star: a star made entirely of neutrons, supported against gravitational collapse by degenerate neutron pressure. Repeat the steps of the previous problem for a neutron star, to determine the following: the mass radius relation; the radius, density, Fermi energy, and Fermi temperature of a one-solar-mass neutron star; and the critical mass above which a neutron star becomes relativistic and hence unstable to further collapse.

For a system of bosons at room temperature, compute the average occupancy of a single-particle state and the probability of the state containing 0,1,2,3bosons, if the energy of the state is

(a) 0.001eVgreater than μ

(b) 0.01eVgreater than μ

(c) 0.1eVgreater than μ

(d) 1eVgreater than μ

Most spin-1/2 fermions, including electrons and helium-3 atoms, have nonzero magnetic moments. A gas of such particles is therefore paramagnetic. Consider, for example, a gas of free electrons, confined inside a three-dimensional box. The z component of the magnetic moment of each electron is ±µa. In the presence of a magnetic field B pointing in the z direction, each "up" state acquires an additional energy of -μBB, while each "down" state acquires an additional energy of +μBB

(a) Explain why you would expect the magnetization of a degenerate electron gas to be substantially less than that of the electronic paramagnets studied in Chapters 3 and 6, for a given number of particles at a given field strength.

(b) Write down a formula for the density of states of this system in the presence of a magnetic field B, and interpret your formula graphically.

(c) The magnetization of this system is μBN-N, where Nr and N1 are the numbers of electrons with up and down magnetic moments, respectively. Find a formula for the magnetization of this system at T=0, in terms of N, µa, B, and the Fermi energy.

(d) Find the first temperature-dependent correction to your answer to part (c), in the limit TTF. You may assume that μBBkT; this implies that the presence of the magnetic field has negligible effect on the chemical potential μ. (To avoid confusing µB with µ, I suggest using an abbreviation such as o for the quantity µaB.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free