The planet Venus is different from the earth in several respects. First, it is only 70% as far from the sun. Second, its thick clouds reflect 77%of all incident sunlight. Finally, its atmosphere is much more opaque to infrared light.

(a) Calculate the solar constant at the location of Venus, and estimate what the average surface temperature of Venus would be if it had no atmosphere and did not reflect any sunlight.

(b) Estimate the surface temperature again, taking the reflectivity of the clouds into account.

(c) The opaqueness of Venus's atmosphere at infrared wavelengths is roughly 70times that of earth's atmosphere. You can therefore model the atmosphere of Venus as 70successive "blankets" of the type considered in the text, with each blanket at a different equilibrium temperature. Use this model to estimate the surface temperature of Venus. (Hint: The temperature of the top layer is what you found in part (b). The next layer down is warmer by a factor of 21/4. The next layer down is warmer by a smaller factor. Keep working your way down until you see the pattern.)

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The solar constant at the location of Venus is2.8×103W/m2andthe average temperature of Venus if moon has no atmosphere is333K

(b) .

The surface temperature of Venus, when reflectivity is taking into account, is231K.

(c) .

The ground temperature of the Venus is670K.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Given information

  • The amount of solar flux density per unit area is termed as solar constant. and it is given as

σsolar=P4πR2

  • From the Stefan's law of radiationwehavethatamount of heat radiation is as follows: H=σeπr2T4

The above two equations will be used to get the desired result.

02

Step 2. Calculating the solar constant at the location of Venus .

Solar constant is given as :

σsolar=P4πR2

Here,Pis the solar power and data-custom-editor="chemistry" R{ is the mean distance between the sun and Venus. }

The mean distance between the sun and the Venus is 70%of the distance between the earth and the sun.

R=70%150×109m

=1.05×1011m

Putting 3.9×1026WforPand 1.05×1011mforRin the equationσsolar=P4πR2

σsolar=3.9×1026W4π1.05×1011m2

=2.8×103W/m2

Hence, the solar constant at the location of Venus is2.8×103W/m2.

03

Step 3. Calculating  the average temperature of Venus if moon has no atmosphere.

The amount of heat absorbed by planet is

H=σsolarA

=σsolar4πr2

role="math" localid="1647760959262" where,σsolaris the solar constant andris the radius of the planet.

From the Stefan's law of radiation, the amount of heat radiation is as follows

H=σeπr2T4
role="math" localid="1647761137436" σis the Stefan's constant andTis the absolute temperature.

Puttingσsolar4πr2forH

σSolar4πr2=σeπr2T4

T=σSolar4σ14

Putting , 2800w/m2for σSolarand5.6×10-8W/m2·K4forσ.

T=2800W/m245.67×10-8W/m2·K414

T=333K

Hence, the average temperature of Venus if moon has no atmosphere is333K
04

Step 4. Calculating  the surface temperature of Venus , when the reflectivity is taking into account .

As the clouds reflect 77%incoming sunlight, then the remaining 23%will be absorbed Hence, the new solar constant will be

σsolar='(23%)σsolar

=(0.23)2.8×103W/m2

=644W/m2

The new surface temperature of the Venusis

T'=σSolar4σ]14

Putting the value of 644W/m2forσsolar'and5.6×10-8W/m2·K4for σ.

T'=644W/m245.67×10-8W/m2·K414

=231K

Hence, the surface temperature of Venus, when reflectivity is taking into account, is231K.

05

Step 5. As we know that

The upper blanket send as much energy downward as it sends upward, so its total emission for each unit of sunlight is two units.

The equilibrium requires that it also absorb two units of infrared radiation and these two units must come from the lower blanket. Since the lower blanket is radiating twice as much as energy upward as the upper blanket, its temperature must be greater by a factor of 214.

In the same way, the lower blanket must also send as much energy down as it sends up - in this case, two units, since it emits a total of four units of which one comes from the upper blanket. The other three must come from the ground, as a check note that the ground is absorbed two units from the lower blanket and one from the sun so it must emit three units. In order for the ground to emit three times as much as energy upward as the upper blanket, its temperature must be greater by a factor of 314.

06

Step 6. Calculating  the ground temperature of Venus .

Hence, the 70thblanket is warmer than first blanket by the order of (70)1/4. So, the ground is warmer than the order of (71)1/4.The temperature of the Venusisgivenas

Tvenus=(71)14·T'Tvenus=(71)14(231K)=670K

Hence, the ground temperature of the Venus is670K

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider a Bose gas confined in an isotropic harmonic trap, as in the previous problem. For this system, because the energy level structure is much simpler than that of a three-dimensional box, it is feasible to carry out the sum in equation 7.121 numerically, without approximating it as an integral.*

(a) Write equation 7.121 for this system as a sum over energy levels, taking degeneracy into account. Replace Tandμwith the dimensionless variables t=kT/hfandc=μ/hf.

(b) Program a computer to calculate this sum for any given values of tandc. Show that, for N=2000, equation 7.121 is satisfied at t=15provided that c=-10.534. (Hint: You'll need to include approximately the first 200 energy levels in the sum.)

(c) For the same parameters as in part (b), plot the number of particles in each energy level as a function of energy.

(d) Now reduce tto 14 , and adjust the value of cuntil the sum again equals 2000. Plot the number of particles as a function of energy.

(e) Repeat part (d) for t=13,12,11,and10. You should find that the required value of cincreases toward zero but never quite reaches it. Discuss the results in some detail.

(a) Estimate (roughly) the total power radiated by your body, neglecting any energy that is returned by your clothes and environment. (Whatever the color of your skin, its emissivity at infrared wavelengths is quite close to 1; almost any nonmetal is a near-perfect blackbody at these wavelengths.)

(b) Compare the total energy radiated by your body in one day (expressed in kilocalories) to the energy in the food you cat. Why is there such a large discrepancy?

(c) The sun has a mass of 2×1030kgand radiates energy at a rate of 3.9×1026watts. Which puts out more power per units mass-the sun or your body?

Consider two single-particle states, A and B, in a system of fermions, where ϵA=μ-xand ϵB=μ+x; that is, level A lies below μ by the same amount that level B lies above μ. Prove that the probability of level B being occupied is the same as the probability of level A being unoccupied. In other words, the Fermi-Dirac distribution is "symmetrical" about the point where ϵ=μ.

A ferromagnet is a material (like iron) that magnetizes spontaneously, even in the absence of an externally applied magnetic field. This happens because each elementary dipole has a strong tendency to align parallel to its neighbors. At t=0the magnetization of a ferromagnet has the maximum possible value, with all dipoles perfectly lined up; if there are Natoms, the total magnetization is typically~2μeN, where µa is the Bohr magneton. At somewhat higher temperatures, the excitations take the form of spin waves, which can be visualized classically as shown in Figure 7.30. Like sound waves, spin waves are quantized: Each wave mode can have only integer multiples of a basic energy unit. In analogy with phonons, we think of the energy units as particles, called magnons. Each magnon reduces the total spin of the system by one unit of h21rand therefore reduces the magnetization by ~2μe. However, whereas the frequency of a sound wave is inversely proportional to its wavelength, the frequency of a spin-wave is proportional to the square of 1λ.. (in the limit of long wavelengths). Therefore, since=hfand p=hλ.. for any "particle," the energy of a magnon is proportional

In the ground state of a ferromagnet, all the elementary dipoles point in the same direction. The lowest-energy excitations above the ground state are spin waves, in which the dipoles precess in a conical motion. A long-wavelength spin wave carries very little energy because the difference in direction between neighboring dipoles is very small.

to the square of its momentum. In analogy with the energy-momentum relation for an ordinary nonrelativistic particle, we can write =p22pm*, wherem* is a constant related to the spin-spin interaction energy and the atomic spacing. For iron, m* turns out to equal 1.24×1029kg, about14times the mass of an electron. Another difference between magnons and phonons is that each magnon ( or spin-wave mode) has only one possible polarization.

(a) Show that at low temperatures, the number of magnons per unit volume in a three-dimensional ferromagnet is given by

NmV=2π2m×kTh2320xex-1dx.

Evaluate the integral numerically.

(b) Use the result of part (a) to find an expression for the fractional reduction in magnetization, (M(O)-M(T))/M(O).Write your answer in the form (T/To)32, and estimate the constantT0for iron.

(c) Calculate the heat capacity due to magnetic excitations in a ferromagnet at low temperature. You should find Cv/Nk=(T/Ti)32, where Tidiffers from To only by a numerical constant. EstimateTifor iron, and compare the magnon and phonon contributions to the heat capacity. (The Debye temperature of iron is 470k.)

(d) Consider a two-dimensional array of magnetic dipoles at low temperature. Assume that each elementary dipole can still point in any (threedimensional) direction, so spin waves are still possible. Show that the integral for the total number of magnons diverge in this case. (This result is an indication that there can be no spontaneous magnetization in such a two-dimensional system. However, in Section 8.2we will consider a different two-dimensional model in which magnetization does occur.)

Most spin-1/2 fermions, including electrons and helium-3 atoms, have nonzero magnetic moments. A gas of such particles is therefore paramagnetic. Consider, for example, a gas of free electrons, confined inside a three-dimensional box. The z component of the magnetic moment of each electron is ±µa. In the presence of a magnetic field B pointing in the z direction, each "up" state acquires an additional energy of -μBB, while each "down" state acquires an additional energy of +μBB

(a) Explain why you would expect the magnetization of a degenerate electron gas to be substantially less than that of the electronic paramagnets studied in Chapters 3 and 6, for a given number of particles at a given field strength.

(b) Write down a formula for the density of states of this system in the presence of a magnetic field B, and interpret your formula graphically.

(c) The magnetization of this system is μBN-N, where Nr and N1 are the numbers of electrons with up and down magnetic moments, respectively. Find a formula for the magnetization of this system at T=0, in terms of N, µa, B, and the Fermi energy.

(d) Find the first temperature-dependent correction to your answer to part (c), in the limit TTF. You may assume that μBBkT; this implies that the presence of the magnetic field has negligible effect on the chemical potential μ. (To avoid confusing µB with µ, I suggest using an abbreviation such as o for the quantity µaB.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free