The heat capacity of liquid H4ebelow 0.6Kis proportional to T3, with the measured valueCV/Nk=(T/4.67K)3. This behavior suggests that the dominant excitations at low temperature are long-wavelength photons. The only important difference between photons in a liquid and photons in a solid is that a liquid cannot transmit transversely polarized waves-sound waves must be longitudinal. The speed of sound in liquid He4is 238m/s, and the density is 0.145g/cm3. From these numbers, calculate the photon contribution to the heat capacity ofHe4in the low-temperature limit, and compare to the measured value.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The photon contribution to the heat capacity of He4in the low-temperature limit is given as C1Nk=T4.64K3

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Given information 

The Debye temperature is given as

TD=hcs2k6NπV13

Here, his the Planck's constant, csis the speed of the sound in the liquid, Nis the Avogadro number, V is the volume, and kis the Boltzmann's constant.

02

Step 2. Calculating the value of volume V first,

The density of the liquid He4is,ρ=mV

Here, mis the mass of the liquid He4.

Solving the equation for V, V=mρ

Substituting value 4gformand 0.145g/cm3for ρ.

role="math" localid="1647513805305" V=4g0.145g/cm3V=27.6cm31m3106cm3V=2.76×10-5m3

03

Step 3. Substituting all the values of h,k,cs,V,N in the Debye temperature formula

Where,

h=6.626×10-34J·scs=238m/sk=1.38×10-23J/KN=6.02×1023V=2.76×10-5m3

so, we get the TD

TD=6.626×10-34J·s(238m/s)21.38×10-23J/K66.02×1023π2.76×10-5m31/3

TD=19.8K

04

Step 4. Now finding the energies of the allowed modes .

So, the energies of the allowed modes is given as

U=nsnynrεn¯PI(ε)

Here, n¯P(ε)is the average Planck's distribution. The number of polarization state tor the lıquid is only 1for the triplet nx,ny,nz.

As, the heat capacity in the low temperature limit for the liquid is equal to 13times of the heat capacity at the lower temperature for the solid as in the formula.

CV=1312π45TTD3Nk

CVNk=4π45TTD3

CVNk=T54π41/319.8K3

=T4.64K3.

Hence,The value of the photon contribution to the heat capacity ofHe4isCVNk=T4.64K3.

05

Step 5. The comparison of the measured values are 

The measured value of CVNkfor the heat capacity of He4is T4.67K3. So, the value found in the above is approximately similar with the measured value of the heat capacity for liquidHe4.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider a gas of noninteracting spin-0 bosons at high temperatures, when TTc. (Note that “high” in this sense can still mean below 1 K.)

  1. Show that, in this limit, the Bose-Einstein function can be written approximately as
    n¯BE=e(μ)/kT[1+eμ/kT+].
  2. Keeping only the terms shown above, plug this result into equation 7.122 to derive the first quantum correction to the chemical potential for gas of bosons.
  3. Use the properties of the grand free energy (Problems 5.23 and 7.7) to show that the pressure of any system is given by In P=(kT/V), where Zis the grand partition function. Argue that, for gas of noninteracting particles, In Zcan be computed as the sum over all modes (or single-particle states) of In Zi, where Zi; is the grand partition function for the ithmode.
  4. Continuing with the result of part (c), write the sum over modes as an integral over energy, using the density of states. Evaluate this integral explicitly for gas of noninteracting bosons in the high-temperature limit, using the result of part (b) for the chemical potential and expanding the logarithm as appropriate. When the smoke clears, you should find
    p=NkTV(1NvQ42V),
    again neglecting higher-order terms. Thus, quantum statistics results in a lowering of the pressure of a boson gas, as one might expect.
  5. Write the result of part (d) in the form of the virial expansion introduced in Problem 1.17, and read off the second virial coefficient, B(T). Plot the predicted B(T)for a hypothetical gas of noninteracting helium-4 atoms.
  6. Repeat this entire problem for gas of spin-1/2 fermions. (Very few modifications are necessary.) Discuss the results, and plot the predicted virial coefficient for a hypothetical gas of noninteracting helium-3 atoms.

Consider a degenerate electron gas in which essentially all of the electrons are highly relativistic ϵmc2so that their energies are ϵ=pc(where p is the magnitude of the momentum vector).

(a) Modify the derivation given above to show that for a relativistic electron gas at zero temperature, the chemical potential (or Fermi energy) is given by =

μ=hc(3N/8πV)1/3

(b) Find a formula for the total energy of this system in terms of N and μ.

Consider an isolated system of Nidentical fermions, inside a container where the allowed energy levels are nondegenerate and evenly spaced.* For instance, the fermions could be trapped in a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator potential. For simplicity, neglect the fact that fermions can have multiple spin orientations (or assume that they are all forced to have the same spin orientation). Then each energy level is either occupied or unoccupied, and any allowed system state can be represented by a column of dots, with a filled dot representing an occupied level and a hollow dot representing an unoccupied level. The lowest-energy system state has all levels below a certain point occupied, and all levels above that point unoccupied. Let ηbe the spacing between energy levels, and let be the number of energy units (each of size 11) in excess of the ground-state energy. Assume thatq<N. Figure 7 .8 shows all system states up to q=3.

(a) Draw dot diagrams, as in the figure, for all allowed system states with q=4,q=5,andq=6. (b) According to the fundamental assumption, all allowed system states with a given value of q are equally probable. Compute the probability of each energy level being occupied, for q=6. Draw a graph of this probability as a function of the energy of the level. ( c) In the thermodynamic limit where qis large, the probability of a level being occupied should be given by the Fermi-Dirac distribution. Even though 6 is not a large number, estimate the values of μand T that you would have to plug into the Fermi-Dirac distribution to best fit the graph you drew in part (b).

A representation of the system states of a fermionic sytern with evenly spaced, nondegen erate energy levels. A filled dot rep- resents an occupied single-particle state, while a hollow dot represents an unoccupied single-particle state . {d) Calculate the entropy of this system for each value of q from 0to6, and draw a graph of entropy vs. energy. Make a rough estimate of the slope of this graph near q=6, to obtain another estimate of the temperature of this system at that point. Check that it is in rough agreement with your answer to part ( c).

Explain in some detail why the three graphs in Figure 7.28 all intercept the vertical axis in about the same place, whereas their slopes differ considerably.

Although the integrals (7.53and 7.54) forNand Ucannot be

carried out analytically for all T, it's not difficult to evaluate them numerically

using a computer. This calculation has little relevance for electrons in metals (for

which the limit kT<<EFis always sufficient), but it is needed for liquid H3eand

for astrophysical systems like the electrons at the center of the sun.

(a) As a warm-up exercise, evaluate theNintegral (7.53) for the casekT=εF

and μ=0, and check that your answer is consistent with the graph shown

above. (Hint: As always when solving a problem on a computer, it's best to

first put everything in terms of dimensionless variables. So let t=kTεFrole="math" localid="1649996205331" ,c=μεF

, and x=εkT. Rewrite everything in terms of these variables,

and then put it on the computer.)

(b) The next step is to varyμ holdingT fixed, until the integral works out to

the desired value,N. Do this for values of kTεFranging from 0.1 up to 2,

and plot the results to reproduce Figure7.16. (It's probably not a good idea

to try to use numerical methods when kTεF is much smaller than 0.1, since

you can start getting overflow errors from exponentiating large numbers.

But this is the region where we've already solved the problem analytically.)

(c) Plug your calculated values ofµ into the energy integral (7.54), and evaluate

that integral numerically to obtain the energy as a function of temperature

forkTup to 2εF Plot the results, and evaluate the slope to obtain the

heat capacity. Check that the heat capacity has the expected behavior at

both low and high temperatures.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free