Chapter 7: Q. 7.65 (page 323)
Evaluate the integral in equation numerically, to confirm the value quoted in the text.
Short Answer
The integral in equationis evaluated in simpler form.
Chapter 7: Q. 7.65 (page 323)
Evaluate the integral in equation numerically, to confirm the value quoted in the text.
The integral in equationis evaluated in simpler form.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeFill in the steps to derive equations and.
Near the cells where oxygen is used, its chemical potential is significantly lower than near the lungs. Even though there is no gaseous oxygen near these cells, it is customary to express the abundance of oxygen in terms of the partial pressure of gaseous oxygen that would be in equilibrium with the blood. Using the independent-site model just presented, with only oxygen present, calculate and plot the fraction of occupied heme sites as a function of the partial pressure of oxygen. This curve is called the Langmuir adsorption isotherm ("isotherm" because it's for a fixed temperature). Experiments show that adsorption by myosin follows the shape of this curve quite accurately.
It's not obvious from Figure 7.19 how the Planck spectrum changes as a function of temperature. To examine the temperature dependence, make a quantitative plot of the function for T = 3000 K and T = 6000 K (both on the same graph). Label the horizontal axis in electron-volts.
Consider two single-particle states, A and B, in a system of fermions, where and that is, level A lies below by the same amount that level B lies above . Prove that the probability of level B being occupied is the same as the probability of level A being unoccupied. In other words, the Fermi-Dirac distribution is "symmetrical" about the point where .
Repeat the previous problem, taking into account the two independent spin states of the electron. Now the system has two "occupied" states, one with the electron in each spin configuration. However, the chemical potential of the electron gas is also slightly different. Show that the ratio of probabilities is the same as before: The spin degeneracy cancels out of the saha equation.
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.