By changing variables as in the text, express the diagram in equation 8.18 in terms of the same integral as in the equation8.31. Do the same for the last two diagrams in the first line of the equation8.20. Which diagrams cannot be written in terms of this basic integral?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The result of the question is12N3V3d3rfr2.

Step by step solution

01

Given Information 

We need to find that the diagrams cannot be written in terms of this basic integral.

02

Simplify

For the diagram in the equation 8.18,we have three dots, so first we multiply by Nthen N-1then N-2, and for the two lines connected them we multiply by f12f23and for each dot we have 1Vd3ri, the symmetry factor is 2, since we can number the first dot with 1and third dot with 3and vice versa so we have two ways, so write the second diagram as :

3=12NN-1N-2V3d3r1d3r2d3r3f12f23

let NN-1N-2

3=12N3V3d3r1d3r2d3r3f12f23

the center dot be 1,so we can write the integer as follow

3=12N3V3d3r1d3rfr2

Here,

fr=e-βur-1

the result of the integral over ris the intensive quantity that is independent of r1and V, because frgoes to zero when ris only a few times larger than the size of the molecule, so whatever the value of this integral, the remaining integral over r1results the factor of V,

3=12N3V3d3rfr2

We can not express the last two diagrams in equation 8.20,but we can still determine the size, let vbe the size of the molecule, so the first diagram will have a size of :

N4v3V3

and also the second one will have the same size.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Modify the ising program to compute the total magnetisation (that is, the sum of all the s values) for each iteration, and to tally how often each possible magnetisation value occurs during a run, plotting the results as a histogram. Run the program for a 5 x 5 lattice at a variety of temperatures, and discuss the results. Sketch a graph of the most likely magnetisation value as a function of temperature. If your computer is fast enough, repeat for a 10 x 10 lattice.

Modify the ising program to simulate a one-dimensional Ising model.

(a) For a lattice size of 100, observe the sequence of states generated at various temperatures and discuss the results. According to the exact solution (for an infinite lattice), we expect this system to magnetise only as the temperature goes to zero; is the behaviour of your program consistent with this prediction? How does the typical cluster size depend on temperature?

(b) Modify your program to compute the average energy as in Problem 8.27. Plot the energy and heat capacity vs. temperature and compare to the exact result for an infinite lattice.

(c) Modify your program to compute the magnetisation as in Problem 8.28. Determine the most likely magnetisation for various temperatures and sketch a graph of this quantity. Discuss.

In this section I've formulated the cluster expansion for a gas with a fixed number of particles, using the "canonical" formalism of Chapter 6. A somewhat cleaner approach, however, is to use the "grand canonical" formalism introduced in Section 7.1, in which we allow the system to exchange particles with a much larger reservoir.

(a) Write down a formula for the grand partition function (Z) of a weakly interacting gas in thermal and diffusive equilibrium with a reservoir at fixed T andµ. Express Z as a sum over all possible particle numbers N, with each term involving the ordinary partition function Z(N).

(b) Use equations 8.6 and 8.20 to express Z(N) as a sum of diagrams, then carry out the sum over N, diagram by diagram. Express the result as a sum of similar diagrams, but with a new rule 1 that associates the expression (>./vQ) J d3ri with each dot, where >. = e13µ,. Now, with the awkward factors of N(N - 1) · · · taken care of, you should find that the sum of all diagrams organizes itself into exponential form, resulting in the formula

Note that the exponent contains all connected diagrams, including those that can be disconnected by removal of a single line.

(c) Using the properties of the grand partition function (see Problem 7.7), find diagrammatic expressions for the average number of particles and the pressure of this gas.

(d) Keeping only the first diagram in each sum, express N(µ) and P(µ) in terms of an integral of the Mayer /-function. Eliminate µ to obtain the same result for the pressure (and the second virial coefficient) as derived in the text.

(e) Repeat part (d) keeping the three-dot diagrams as well, to obtain an expression for the third virial coefficient in terms of an integral of /-functions. You should find that the A-shaped diagram cancels, leaving only the triangle diagram to contribute to C(T).

In this problem you will use the mean field approximation to analyse the behaviour of the Ising model near the critical point.

(a) Prove that, when x1,tanhxx-13x3

(b) Use the result of part (a) to find an expression for the magnetisation of the Ising model, in the mean field approximation, when T is very close to the critical temperature. You should find MTc-Tβ¯,whereβ(not to be confused with 1/kT) is a critical exponent, analogous to the f defined for a fluid in Problem 5.55. Onsager's exact solution shows that β=1/8in two dimensions, while experiments and more sophisticated approximations show that β1/3in three dimensions. The mean field approximation, however, predicts a larger value.

(c) The magnetic susceptibility χis defined as χ(M/B)T. The behaviour of this quantity near the critical point is conventionally written as χT-Tc-γ , where y is another critical exponent. Find the value of in the mean field approximation, and show that it does not depend on whether T is slightly above or slightly below Te. (The exact value of y in two dimensions turns out to be 7/4, while in three dimensions γ1.24.)

Starting from the partition function, calculate the average energy of the one-dimensional Ising model, to verify equation 8.44. Sketch the average energy as a function of temperature.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free