Chapter 2: Q. 2.17 (page 64)
Use the methods of this section to derive a formula, similar to equation, for the multiplicity of an Einstein solid in the "low-temperature" limit, .
Short Answer
The formula of the Similar Equation
Chapter 2: Q. 2.17 (page 64)
Use the methods of this section to derive a formula, similar to equation, for the multiplicity of an Einstein solid in the "low-temperature" limit, .
The formula of the Similar Equation
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeCalculate the multiplicity of an Einstein solid with oscillators and units of energy. (Do not attempt to list all the microstates.)
Consider an ideal monatomic gas that lives in a two-dimensional universe ("flatland"), occupying an area instead of a volume . By following the same logic as above, find a formula for the multiplicity of this gas, analogous to equation .
Consider a two-state paramagnet with elementary dipoles, with the total energy fixed at zero so that exactly half the dipoles point up and half point down.
(a) How many microstates are "accessible" to this system?
(b) Suppose that the microstate of this system changes a billion times per second. How many microstates will it explore in ten billion years (the age of the universe)?
(c) Is it correct to say that, if you wait long enough, a system will eventually be found in every "accessible" microstate? Explain your answer, and discuss the meaning of the word "accessible."
For each of the following irreversible processes, explain how you can tell that the total entropy of the universe has increased.
Stirring salt into a pot of soup.
Scrambling an egg.
Humpty Dumpty having a great fall.
A wave hitting a sand castle.
Cutting down a tree.
Burning gasoline in an automobile.
A black hole is a region of space where gravity is so strong that nothing, not even light, can escape. Throwing something into a black hole is therefore an irreversible process, at least in the everyday sense of the word. In fact, it is irreversible in the thermodynamic sense as well: Adding mass to a black hole increases the black hole's entropy. It turns out that there's no way to tell (at least from outside) what kind of matter has gone into making a black hole. Therefore, the entropy of a black hole must be greater than the entropy of any conceivable type of matter that could have been used to create it. Knowing this, it's not hard to estimate the entropy of a black hole.
Use dimensional analysis to show that a black hole of mass should have a radius of order , where is Newton's gravitational constant and is the speed of light. Calculate the approximate radius of a one-solar-mass black hole .
In the spirit of Problem , explain why the entropy of a black hole, in fundamental units, should be of the order of the maximum number of particles that could have been used to make it.
To make a black hole out of the maximum possible number of particles, you should use particles with the lowest possible energy: long-wavelength photons (or other massless particles). But the wavelength can't be any longer than the size of the black hole. By setting the total energy of the photons equal to , estimate the maximum number of photons that could be used to make a black hole of mass . Aside from a factor of , your result should agree with the exact formula for the entropy of a black hole, obtained* through a much more difficult calculation:
Calculate the entropy of a one-solar-mass black hole, and comment on the result.
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.