Problem 2.20. Suppose you were to shrink Figure2.7until the entire horizontal scale fits on the page. How wide would the peak be?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Fraction of the total width of the graph is around the hydrogen atom

1×10-12m

Step by step solution

01

Distance between the two points

Schroeder shows thatΩbecomes, near the peak:

Ω=Ωmax·e-N2xq2

which is a Gaussian curve. The width can be defined as the distance in xbetween the points where the curve is 1eof its maximum value, so:

Ωmaxe=Ωmax·e-N2xq2

e1=eN2xq2

1=N2xq2

x=q2N

so the width of the curve is twice this, or:

x=qN

02

Peak is a fraction

Since we're assumingq>>N, this width is still a large number, but since the total width of the graph is q+1, the width of the peak as a fraction of the total width of the graph is around:

q(q+1)N1N

which for any macroscopic value of N, is vanishingly small. For example, if Nis on the order of 1020, and we drew the graph so that the total width of the graph fits on a page 10cmwide, , the width of the central peak is around:

10×10-3m1020=1×10-12m

which is about frac1120the size of a hydrogen atom.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The mixing entropy formula derived in the previous problem actually applies to any ideal gas, and to some dense gases, liquids, and solids as well. For the denser systems, we have to assume that the two types of molecules are the same size and that molecules of different types interact with each other in the same way as molecules of the same type (same forces, etc.). Such a system is called an ideal mixture. Explain why, for an ideal mixture, the mixing entropy is given by

ΔSmixing=klnNNA

where Nis the total number of molecules and NAis the number of molecules of type A. Use Stirling's approximation to show that this expression is the same as the result of the previous problem when both Nand NAare large.

Suppose you flip four fair coins.

(a) Make a list of all the possible outcomes, as in Table 2.1.

(b) Make a list of all the different "macrostates" and their probabilities.

(c) Compute the multiplicity of each macrostate using the combinatorial formula 2.6, and check that these results agree with what you got by bruteforce counting.

Consider a system of two Einstein solids, Aand B, each containing 10 oscillators, sharing a total of 20units of energy. Assume that the solids are weakly coupled, and that the total energy is fixed.

(a) How many different macro states are available to this system?

(b) How many different microstates are available to this system?

(c) Assuming that this system is in thermal equilibrium, what is the probability of finding all the energy in solid A?

(d) What is the probability of finding exactly half of the energy in solid A?

(e) Under what circumstances would this system exhibit irreversible behavior?

For a single large two-state paramagnet, the multiplicity function is very sharply peaked about N=N/2.

(a) Use Stirling's approximation to estimate the height of the peak in the multiplicity function.

(b) Use the methods of this section to derive a formula for the multiplicity function in the vicinity of the peak, in terms of xN(N/2). Check that your formula agrees with your answer to part (a) when x=0.

(c) How wide is the peak in the multiplicity function?

(d) Suppose you flip 1,000,000coins. Would you be surprised to obtain heads and 499,000 tails? Would you be surprised to obtain 510,000 heads and 490,000 tails? Explain.

Show that during the quasistatic isothermal expansion of a monatomic ideal gas, the change in entropy is related to the heat input Qby the simple formula

s=QT

In the following chapter I'll prove that this formula is valid for any quasistatic process. Show, however, that it is not valid for the free expansion process described above.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free