How many possible arrangements are there for a deck of 52playing cards? (For simplicity, consider only the order of the cards, not whether they are turned upside-down, etc.) Suppose you start w e in the process? Express your answer both as a pure number (neglecting the factor of k) and in SI units. Is this entropy significant compared to the entropy associated with arranging thermal energy among the molecules in the cards?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The Boltzmann constant Swith and without.

  • With Boltzmann constant S=2.157 *10^21 J.K^1
  • With Boltzmann constant S = 156.36

Step by step solution

01

The entropy create in the process

  • In a standard pack of playing cards there are N=52different cards, so they can be arranged in:

Ω=N!=52!=8.07×1067ways

  • The size of this number is why it's highly unlikely that any card game that relies on dealing cards from a shuffled deck will ever repeat itself. The entropy of a shuffled deck is therefore:

S=klnΩ

substitute withk=1.38×1023JK1 S=1.38×10-23ln8.07×1067=2.157×10-21J·K-1

S=1.38×1023ln8.07×1067=2.157×1021JK1

02

Calculate without Boltzmann Constants

Without Boltzmann's constant we have,

S=lnΩ=ln(8.07x1067)=156.36

  • Although playing cards aren't made of an Einstein solid, the multiplicity of the macrostate in which thermal energy is exchanged among the cards will be something of similar order. The approximate multiplicity in the high temperature case for an Einstein solid with oscillators and q >> N energy quanta is

ΩqeNN

  • For Non the order of 1023 ,Ωis a very large number, so the thermal entropy of the cards is vastly greater than the entropy generated by shuffling the deck.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Use the Sackur-Tetrode equation to calculate the entropy of a mole of argon gas at room temperature and atmospheric pressure. Why is the entropy greater than that of a mole of helium under the same conditions?

For either a monatomic ideal gas or a high-temperature Einstein solid, the entropy is given by times some logarithm. The logarithm is never large, so if all you want is an order-of-magnitude estimate, you can neglect it and just say . That is, the entropy in fundamental units is of the order of the number of particles in the system. This conclusion turns out to be true for most systems (with some important exceptions at low temperatures where the particles are behaving in an orderly way). So just for fun, make a very rough estimate of the entropy of each of the following: this book (a kilogram of carbon compounds); a moose of water ; the sun of ionized hydrogen .

Fill in the algebraic steps to derive the Sackur-Tetrode equation(2.49).

For an Einstein solid with four oscillators and two units of energy, represent each possible microstate as a series of dots and vertical lines, as used in the text to prove equation 2.9.

Consider again the system of two large, identical Einstein solids treated in Problem 2.22.

(a) For the case N=1023, compute the entropy of this system (in terms of Boltzmann's constant), assuming that all of the microstates are allowed. (This is the system's entropy over long time scales.)

(b) Compute the entropy again, assuming that the system is in its most likely macro state. (This is the system's entropy over short time scales, except when there is a large and unlikely fluctuation away from the most likely macro state.)

(c) Is the issue of time scales really relevant to the entropy of this system?

(d) Suppose that, at a moment when the system is near its most likely macro state, you suddenly insert a partition between the solids so that they can no longer exchange energy. Now, even over long time scales, the entropy is given by your answer to part (b). Since this number is less than your answer to part (a), you have, in a sense, caused a violation of the second law of thermodynamics. Is this violation significant? Should we lose any sleep over it?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free