Show that during the quasistatic isothermal expansion of a monatomic ideal gas, the change in entropy is related to the heat input Qby the simple formula

s=QT

In the following chapter I'll prove that this formula is valid for any quasistatic process. Show, however, that it is not valid for the free expansion process described above.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The Formula of monatomic ideal gas of during quasistatic isothermal expansion is proved as change in entropy,s=QTand the reason is valid where expanding gas is work,so the heat input provide energy for work.

Step by step solution

01

Step: 1 Sackur-Tetrode equation:

The entropy substance as

S=kln(Ω)

where Ωis the number of microstates accessible substance.

For 3-dideal gas, the formula by

S=NklnVN4mπU3Nh232+52

02

Step; 2 Equating amount of energy:

Where,Vrepresents volume, Urepresents energy, Nrepresents the number of molecules, mrepresents the mass of a single molecule, and hrepresents Planck's constant. Despite the fact that this formula appears to be a little difficult, we can see that raising either of V,U, or Nincreases entropy. The gas expands quasistatically in an isothermal expansion, keeping its temperature constant. This indicates that U=3/2NkTremains constant as well, leaving just the volume to vary. Because the gas is doing work Wby expanding, the energy for the work must come from a source of heat Qintroduced into the gas to keep the temperature constant. The first law of thermodynamics states:

Q=ΔU+W

But U=0and W=ViVfPdVwe get

Q=ViVfPdV

From ideal-gas law,

role="math" localid="1650264837406" P=NkTV,ViVfdVVdVQ=NkTNkT[ln(V)]ViVfQ=NkTlnVfVi

03

Step: 3 Change in entropy:

Substituting the constant Uand Nwe get

S=NklnVN4mπU3Nh232+52S=Nkln(V)+ln1N4mπU3Nh232+52ln1N4mπU3Nh232

The change in entropy process where volume only changes by

ΔS=SfSi=NklnVflnViΔS=NklnVfViΔS=QT

The reason is valid where expanding gas is work,so the heat input provide energy for work.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

How many possible arrangements are there for a deck of 52playing cards? (For simplicity, consider only the order of the cards, not whether they are turned upside-down, etc.) Suppose you start w e in the process? Express your answer both as a pure number (neglecting the factor of k) and in SI units. Is this entropy significant compared to the entropy associated with arranging thermal energy among the molecules in the cards?

Consider a system of two Einstein solids, \(A\) and \(B\), each containing 10 oscillators, sharing a total of 20 units of energy. Assume that the solids are weakly coupled, and that the total energy is fixed.

(a) How many different macrostates are available to this system?

(b) How many different microstates are available to this system?

(c) Assuming that this system is in thermal equilibrium, what is the probability of finding all the energy in solid \(A\) ?

(d) What is the probability of finding exactly half of the energy in solid \(A\) ?

(e) Under what circumstances would this system exhibit irreversible behavior?

Using the same method as in the text, calculate the entropy of mixing for a system of two monatomic ideal gases, Aand B, whose relative proportion is arbitrary. Let Nbe the total number of molecules and letx be the fraction of these that are of speciesB . You should find

ΔSmixing=Nk[xlnx+(1x)ln(1x)]

Check that this expression reduces to the one given in the text whenx=1/2 .

For an Einstein solid with four oscillators and two units of energy, represent each possible microstate as a series of dots and vertical lines, as used in the text to prove equation 2.9.

For a single large two-state paramagnet, the multiplicity function is very sharply peaked about N=N/2.

(a) Use Stirling's approximation to estimate the height of the peak in the multiplicity function.

(b) Use the methods of this section to derive a formula for the multiplicity function in the vicinity of the peak, in terms of xN(N/2). Check that your formula agrees with your answer to part (a) when x=0.

(c) How wide is the peak in the multiplicity function?

(d) Suppose you flip 1,000,000coins. Would you be surprised to obtain heads and 499,000 tails? Would you be surprised to obtain 510,000 heads and 490,000 tails? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free