To investigate the stability of the motion described in the preceding question, evaluate the second derivatives of \(U\) at \(\rho=a, z=0\), and show that they may be written \(\begin{gathered} \frac{\partial^{2} U}{\partial \rho^{2}}=\frac{q^{2}}{m}\left[B_{z}\left(B_{z}+\rho \frac{\partial B_{z}}{\partial \rho}\right)\right]_{\rho=a, z=0} \\ \frac{\partial^{2} U}{\partial \rho \partial z}=0, \quad \frac{\partial^{2} U}{\partial z^{2}}=-\frac{q^{2}}{m}\left[B_{z} \rho \frac{\partial B_{z}}{\partial \rho}\right]_{\rho=a, z=0} \end{gathered}\) (Hint: You will need to use the \(\varphi\) component of the equation \(\boldsymbol{\nabla} \wedge \boldsymbol{B}=\mathbf{0}\), and the fact that, since \(B_{\rho}=0\) for all \(\rho, \partial B_{\rho} / \partial \rho=0\) also.) Given that the dependence of \(B_{z}\) on \(\rho\) near the equilibrium orbit is described by \(B_{z} \propto(a / \rho)^{n}\), show that the orbit is stable if \(0

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Determine the condition for the stability of the circular orbit of a charged particle in the z = 0 plane, given that the magnetic field depends on the coordinate ρ near the equilibrium orbit as \(B_{z} \propto(a / \rho)^{n}\), where a is a constant, and \(0<n<1\). Short Answer: The circular orbit of a charged particle in the z=0 plane will be stable if the condition \(0<n<1\) is satisfied. This means that the power n in the expression for the dependence of \(B_{z}\) on \(\rho\) should fall between 0 and 1 for stability.

Step by step solution

01

Use the curl equation

To evaluate the second derivatives, we need to use the given hint, which involves the equation for the curl of the magnetic field \(\nabla \wedge \boldsymbol{B} = \mathbf{0}\). We are given that \(B_{\rho} = 0\) and \(\frac{\partial B_{\rho}}{\partial \rho} = 0\). In cylindrical coordinates, the curl equation can be written as: $$ \nabla \wedge \boldsymbol{B} = \left(\frac{1}{\rho} \frac{\partial B_z}{\partial \rho} - \frac{\partial B_{\phi}}{\partial z}\right) \boldsymbol{\rho} + \left(\frac{\partial B_{\rho}}{\partial z} - \frac{\partial B_z}{\partial z}\right) \boldsymbol{\phi} + \frac{1}{\rho}\left(\frac{\partial \left(\rho B_{\phi}\right)}{\partial \rho} - \frac{\partial B_{\rho}}{\partial \phi}\right)\boldsymbol{z} $$ The \(\phi\) component must be zero according to the hint: $$ \frac{\partial B_{\rho}}{\partial z} - \frac{\partial B_z}{\partial z} = 0 $$ Since \(B_{\rho} = 0\), $$ \frac{\partial B_z}{\partial z} = 0 $$
02

Evaluate the expressions

Now, we will evaluate the expressions: $$ \frac{\partial^{2} U}{\partial \rho^{2}}=\frac{q^{2}}{m}\left[B_{z}\left(B_{z}+\rho \frac{\partial B_{z}}{\partial \rho}\right)\right]_{\rho=a, z=0} $$
03

Determine the dependence of \(B_z\) on \(\rho\)

We are given that the dependence of \(B_z\) on \(\rho\) near the equilibrium orbit is described by \(B_{z} \propto(a / \rho)^{n}\). Therefore, we can write: $$ B_z \sim \left(\frac{a}{\rho}\right)^n $$ Differentiating with respect to \(\rho\), we get: $$ \frac{\partial B_z}{\partial \rho} \sim -n \left(\frac{a}{\rho}\right)^{n+1} $$ Now, we substitute these expressions back into the second derivatives: $$ {\frac{\partial^{2} U}{\partial \rho^{2}}}_{\rho=a, z=0}=\frac{q^{2}}{m}\left[B_{z}\left(B_{z}+\rho \frac{\partial B_{z}}{\partial \rho}\right)\right]_{\rho=a, z=0} = \frac{q^{2}}{m} B_z^2 \left(1 - n\right) $$ and $$ \frac{\partial^{2} U}{\partial z^{2}}=-\frac{q^{2}}{m}\left[B_{z} \rho \frac{\partial B_{z}}{\partial \rho}\right]_{\rho=a, z=0} = -n \frac{q^2}{m} B_z^2 $$
04

Check the stability

For the motion to be stable, the second derivative of the potential energy with respect to \(\rho\) and \(z\) should be positive and negative, respectively. So we need to satisfy: $$ {\frac{\partial^{2} U}{\partial \rho^{2}}}_{\rho=a, z=0} > 0\quad \text{and} \quad \frac{\partial^{2} U}{\partial z^{2}}_{\rho=a, z=0} < 0 $$ From the expressions above, we have: $$ \frac{q^{2}}{m} B_z^2 \left(1 - n\right) > 0\quad \text{and} \quad -n \frac{q^2}{m} B_z^2 < 0 $$ Since \(\frac{q^2}{m} B_z^2 > 0\), we can deduce that \(1 > n > 0\). Therefore, for the circular orbit to be stable, the condition \(0<n<1\) must be satisfied.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

To prove that the effective potential energy function \(U(\theta)\) of the symmetric top (see \(\S\) 12.4) has only a single minimum, show that the equation \(U(\theta)=E\) can be written as a cubic equation in the variable \(z=\cos \theta\), with three roots in general. Show, however, that \(f(z)\) has the same sign at both \(z=\pm 1\), and hence that there are either two roots or none between these points: for every \(E\) there are at most two values of \(\theta\) for which \(U(\theta)=E\)

Find the Hamiltonian for a charged particle in electric and magnetic fields in cylindrical polars, starting from the Lagrangian function (10.29). Show that in the case of an axially symmetric, static magnetic field, described by the single component \(A_{\varphi}(\rho, z)\) of the vector potential, it takes the form \(H=\frac{1}{2 m}\left(p_{z}^{2}+p_{\rho}^{2}+\frac{\left(p_{\varphi}-q \rho A_{\varphi}\right)^{2}}{\rho^{2}}\right)\) (Note: Remember that the subscripts \(\varphi\) on the generalized momentum \(p_{\varphi}\) and on the component \(A_{\varphi}\) mean different things.)

A particle of mass \(m\) moves in three dimensions under the action of a central, conservative force with potential energy \(V(r)\). Find the Hamiltonian function in terms of spherical polar co-ordinates, and show that \(\varphi\), but \(\operatorname{not} \theta\), is ignorable. Express the quantity \(J^{2}=\) \(m^{2} r^{4}\left(\dot{\theta}^{2}+\sin ^{2} \theta \dot{\varphi}^{2}\right)\) in terms of the generalized momenta, and show that it is a second constant of the motion.

A light, inextensible string passes over a small pulley and carries a mass \(2 \mathrm{~m}\) on one end. On the other end is a mass \(m\), and beneath it, supported by a spring with spring constant \(k\), a second mass \(m\). Find the Hamiltonian function, using the distance \(x\) of the first mass beneath the pulley, and the extension \(y\) in the spring, as generalized coordinates. Show that \(x\) is ignorable. To what symmetry property does this correspond? (In other words, what operation can be performed on the system without changing its energy?) If the system is released from rest with the spring unextended, find the positions of the particles at any later time.

A particle of mass \(m\) and charge \(q\) is moving in the equatorial plane \(z=0\) of a magnetic dipole of moment \(\mu\), described (see Appendix A, Problem 12) by a vector potential with the single non-zero component \(A_{\varphi}=\mu_{0} \mu \sin \theta / 4 \pi r^{2}\). Show that it will continue to move in this plane. Initially, it is approaching from a great distance with velocity \(v\) and impact parameter \(b\), whose sign is defined to be that of \(p_{\varphi}\). Show that \(v\) and \(p_{\varphi}\) are constants of the motion, and that the distance of closest approach to the dipole is \(\frac{1}{2}\left(\sqrt{b^{2} \mp a^{2}} \pm b\right)\), according as \(b>a\) or \(b

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free