A particle of mass \(m\) moves in three dimensions under the action of a central, conservative force with potential energy \(V(r)\). Find the Hamiltonian function in terms of spherical polar co-ordinates, and show that \(\varphi\), but \(\operatorname{not} \theta\), is ignorable. Express the quantity \(J^{2}=\) \(m^{2} r^{4}\left(\dot{\theta}^{2}+\sin ^{2} \theta \dot{\varphi}^{2}\right)\) in terms of the generalized momenta, and show that it is a second constant of the motion.

Short Answer

Expert verified
In summary, we found the kinetic energy of a particle moving in three dimensions in spherical polar coordinates and constructed the Hamiltonian function. We then determined generalized momenta and found that while the coordinate \(\varphi\) is ignorable, \(\theta\) is not. We expressed \(J^2\) in terms of generalized momenta and verified that it is a constant of the motion.

Step by step solution

01

Find the kinetic energy in spherical polar coordinates

First, we need to express the kinetic energy of the particle in spherical polar coordinates. To do this, we can recall the transformation between Cartesian and spherical polar coordinates: \(x = r\sin\theta\cos\varphi\) \(y = r\sin\theta\sin\varphi\) \(z = r\cos\theta\) Now, we differentiate these equations with respect to time to find the velocity components in Cartesian coordinates: \(\dot{x} = \dot{r}\sin\theta\cos\varphi + r\cos\theta\cos\varphi\dot{\theta} - r\sin\theta\sin\varphi\dot{\varphi}\) \(\dot{y} = \dot{r}\sin\theta\sin\varphi + r\cos\theta\sin\varphi\dot{\theta} + r\sin\theta\cos\varphi\dot{\varphi}\) \(\dot{z} = \dot{r}\cos\theta - r\sin\theta\dot{\theta}\) Now we can find the kinetic energy T in terms of spherical polar coordinates by using the velocity components: \(T = \dfrac{1}{2}m(\dot{x}^2 + \dot{y}^2 + \dot{z}^2)\) After some algebraic manipulations, we get: \(T=\dfrac{1}{2}m\left(\dot{r}^{2}+r^2\left(\dot{\theta}^{2}+\sin^2\theta\dot{\varphi}^{2}\right)\right)\)
02

Construct the Hamiltonian function

Now that we have found the kinetic energy in spherical polar coordinates, let us write down the Hamiltonian function, which is the sum of the kinetic and potential energies: \(H = T + V = \dfrac{1}{2}m\left(\dot{r}^{2}+r^2\left(\dot{\theta}^{2}+\sin^2\theta\dot{\varphi}^{2}\right)\right) + V(r)\)
03

Find the generalized momenta

To determine whether \(\varphi\) and \(\theta\) are ignorable coordinates, we need to find the generalized momenta associated with these coordinates. The generalized momentum associated with a generalized coordinate \(q\) is defined as: \(p_q = \dfrac{\partial L}{\partial\dot{q}}\) where \(L\) is the Lagrangian, which can be written as \(L = T - V\). First, let us find the generalized momentum associated with \(\varphi\): \(p_{\varphi} = \dfrac{\partial}{\partial\dot{\varphi}}\left(\dfrac{1}{2}m\left(\dot{r}^{2}+r^2\left(\dot{\theta}^{2}+\sin^2\theta\dot{\varphi}^{2}\right)\right) - V(r)\right) = mr^2\sin^2\theta\dot{\varphi}\) Next, let's find the generalized momentum associated with \(\theta\): \(p_{\theta} = \dfrac{\partial}{\partial\dot{\theta}}\left(\dfrac{1}{2}m\left(\dot{r}^{2}+r^2\left(\dot{\theta}^{2}+\sin^2\theta\dot{\varphi}^{2}\right)\right) - V(r)\right) = mr^2\dot{\theta}\)
04

Determine ignorable coordinates

A coordinate is ignorable if its generalized momentum does not depend on the coordinate itself. From our results above, we see that: \(p_{\varphi} = mr^2\sin^2\theta\dot{\varphi}\) does not depend on \(\varphi\). Therefore, \(\varphi\) is an ignorable coordinate. On the other hand, \(p_{\theta} = mr^2\dot{\theta}\) does depend on \(\theta\) through the term \(\sin^2\theta\). Thus, \(\theta\) is not an ignorable coordinate.
05

Express \(J^2\) in terms of generalized momenta

We are asked to express the given quantity \(J^2\) in terms of generalized momenta: \(J^2 = m^2r^4\left(\dot{\theta}^2 + \sin^2\theta\dot{\varphi}^2\right)\) Using the expressions for \(p_{\varphi}\) and \(p_{\theta}\) we found earlier, we can write \(J^2\) as: \(J^2 = \dfrac{1}{m^2r^4}\left(p_{\theta}^2 + \dfrac{p_{\varphi}^2}{\sin^2\theta}\right)\)
06

Show \(J^2\) is a constant of the motion

A quantity is a constant of the motion if its time derivative is zero. To show that \(J^2\) is a constant of the motion, we need to differentiate it with respect to time and show that the derivative is zero. Differentiating \(J^2\) with respect to time gives: \(\dfrac{dJ^2}{dt} = \dfrac{d}{dt}\left(\dfrac{1}{m^2r^4}\left(p_{\theta}^2 + \dfrac{p_{\varphi}^2}{\sin^2\theta}\right)\right)\) Using the chain rule and noting that the time derivatives of \(p_{\theta}\) and \(p_{\varphi}\) are zero (since they are constants of motion), we find that the time derivative of \(J^2\) is indeed zero: \(\dfrac{dJ^2}{dt} = 0\) Therefore, \(J^2\) is a constant of the motion.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

To investigate the stability of the motion described in the preceding question, evaluate the second derivatives of \(U\) at \(\rho=a, z=0\), and show that they may be written \(\begin{gathered} \frac{\partial^{2} U}{\partial \rho^{2}}=\frac{q^{2}}{m}\left[B_{z}\left(B_{z}+\rho \frac{\partial B_{z}}{\partial \rho}\right)\right]_{\rho=a, z=0} \\ \frac{\partial^{2} U}{\partial \rho \partial z}=0, \quad \frac{\partial^{2} U}{\partial z^{2}}=-\frac{q^{2}}{m}\left[B_{z} \rho \frac{\partial B_{z}}{\partial \rho}\right]_{\rho=a, z=0} \end{gathered}\) (Hint: You will need to use the \(\varphi\) component of the equation \(\boldsymbol{\nabla} \wedge \boldsymbol{B}=\mathbf{0}\), and the fact that, since \(B_{\rho}=0\) for all \(\rho, \partial B_{\rho} / \partial \rho=0\) also.) Given that the dependence of \(B_{z}\) on \(\rho\) near the equilibrium orbit is described by \(B_{z} \propto(a / \rho)^{n}\), show that the orbit is stable if \(0

A particle of mass \(m\) and charge \(q\) is moving around a fixed point charge \(-q^{\prime}\left(q q^{\prime}>0\right)\), and in a uniform magnetic field \(\boldsymbol{B}\). The motion is confined to the plane perpendicular to \(\boldsymbol{B}\). Write down the Lagrangian function in polar co-ordinates rotating with the Larmor angular velocity \(\omega_{\mathrm{L}}=-q B / 2 m\) (see \(\left.\S 5.5\right) .\) Hence find the Hamiltonian function. Show that \(\varphi\) is ignorable, and interpret the conservation law. (Note that \(J_{z}\) is not a constant of the motion.)

A particle of mass \(m\) and charge \(q\) is moving in the equatorial plane \(z=0\) of a magnetic dipole of moment \(\mu\), described (see Appendix A, Problem 12) by a vector potential with the single non-zero component \(A_{\varphi}=\mu_{0} \mu \sin \theta / 4 \pi r^{2}\). Show that it will continue to move in this plane. Initially, it is approaching from a great distance with velocity \(v\) and impact parameter \(b\), whose sign is defined to be that of \(p_{\varphi}\). Show that \(v\) and \(p_{\varphi}\) are constants of the motion, and that the distance of closest approach to the dipole is \(\frac{1}{2}\left(\sqrt{b^{2} \mp a^{2}} \pm b\right)\), according as \(b>a\) or \(b

A particle of mass \(m\) slides on the inside of a smooth cone of semivertical angle \(\alpha\), whose axis points vertically upwards. Obtain the Hamiltonian function, using the distance \(r\) from the vertex, and the azimuth angle \(\varphi\) as generalized co-ordinates. Show that stable circular motion is possible for any value of \(r\), and determine the corresponding angular velocity, \(\omega\). Find the angle \(\alpha\) if the frequency of small oscillations about this circular motion is also \(\omega\).

Show that the condition that Hamilton's equations remain unchanged under the transformation generated by \(G\) is \(\mathrm{d} G / \mathrm{d} t=0\) even in the case when \(G\) has an explicit time-dependence, in addition to its dependence via \(q(t)\) and \(p(t)\). Proceed as follows. The first set of Hamilton's equations, \((12.6)\), will be unchanged provided that $$\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} t}\left(\delta q_{\alpha}\right)=\delta\left(\frac{\partial H}{\partial p_{\alpha}}\right)$$ Write both sides of this equation in terms of \(G\) and use \((12.33)\) applied both to \(\partial G / \partial p_{\alpha}\) and to \(G\) itself to show that it is equivalent to the condition $$\frac{\partial}{\partial p_{\alpha}}\left(\frac{\mathrm{d} G}{\mathrm{~d} t}\right)=0$$ Thus \(\mathrm{d} G / \mathrm{d} t\) is independent of each \(p_{\alpha} .\) Similarly, by using the other set of Hamilton's equations, \((12.7)\), show that it is independent of each \(q_{\alpha}\). Thus \(\mathrm{d} G / \mathrm{d} t\) must be a function of \(t\) alone. But since we can always add to \(G\) any function of \(t\) alone without affecting the transformation it generates, this means we can choose it so that \(\mathrm{d} G / \mathrm{d} t=0\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free