Chapter 4: Q3CQ (page 159)
How are inertia and mass related?
Short Answer
The object with more mass has more inertia. Inertia is directly proportional to the mass of the body.
Chapter 4: Q3CQ (page 159)
How are inertia and mass related?
The object with more mass has more inertia. Inertia is directly proportional to the mass of the body.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeA 1100-kg car pulls a boat on a trailer.
(a) What total force resists the motion of the car, boat, and trailer, if the car exerts a 1900-N force on the road and produces an acceleration of 0.550 m/s2? The mass of the boat plus trailer is 700 kg.
(b) What is the force in the hitch between the car and the trailer if 80% of the resisting forces are experienced by the boat and trailer?
When you take off in a jet aircraft, there is a sensation of being pushed back into the seat. Explain why you move backward in the seat—is there really a force backward on you? (The same reasoning explains whiplash injuries, in which the head is apparently thrown backward.)
What is the ratio of the strength of the strong nuclear force to that of the electromagnetic force? Based on this ratio, you might expect that the strong force dominates the nucleus, which is true for small nuclei. Large nuclei, however, have sizes greater than the range of the strong nuclear force. At these sizes, the electromagnetic force begins to affect nuclear stability. These facts will be used to explain nuclear fusion and fission later in this text.
(a) Find the magnitudes of the forces F1 and F2 that add to give the total force Ftot shown in Figure 4.35. This may be done either graphically or by using trigonometry.
(b) Show graphically that the same total force is obtained independent of the order of addition of F1and F2 .
(c) Find the direction and magnitude of some other pair of vectors that add to give Ftot . Draw these to scale on the same drawing used in part (b) or a similar picture.
Unreasonable Results
(a) Repeat Exercise 4.29, but assume an acceleration of 1.20 m/s2 is produced. (b) What is unreasonable about the result?
(c) Which premise is unreasonable, and why is it unreasonable?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.