Chapter 34: Q11CQ (page 1237)
If the smallest meaningful time interval is greater than zero, will the lines in Figure below ever meet?
Short Answer
The lines in the given figure will never meet.
Chapter 34: Q11CQ (page 1237)
If the smallest meaningful time interval is greater than zero, will the lines in Figure below ever meet?
The lines in the given figure will never meet.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeMust a complex system be adaptive to be of interest in the field of complexity? Give an example to support your answer.
A section of superconducting wire carries a current of\({\rm{100 A}}\)and requires\({\rm{1}}{\rm{.00 L}}\)of liquid nitrogen per hour to keep it below its critical temperature. For it to be economically advantageous to use a superconducting wire, the cost of cooling the wire must be less than the cost of energy lost to heat in the wire. Assume that the cost of liquid nitrogen is\({\rm{\$ 0}}{\rm{.30}}\)per litre, and that electric energy costs\({\rm{\$ 0}}{\rm{.10}}\)per KW·h. What is the resistance of a normal wire that costs as much in wasted electric energy as the cost of liquid nitrogen for the superconductor?
To get an idea of how empty deep space is on the average, perform the following calculations: (a) Find the volume our Sun would occupy if it had an average density equal to the critical density of\({\rm{1}}{{\rm{0}}^{{\rm{ - 26}}}}{\rm{kg/}}{{\rm{m}}^{\rm{3}}}\)thought necessary to halt the expansion of the universe. (b) Find the radius of a sphere of this volume in light years. (c) What would this radius be if the density were that of luminous matter, which is approximately\({\rm{5 \% }}\)that of the critical density? (d) Compare the radius found in part (c) with the\({\rm{4 - ly}}\)average separation of stars in the arms of the Milky Way.
Olbers’s paradox poses an interesting question: If the universe is infinite, then any line of sight should eventually fall on a star’s surface. Why then is the sky dark at night? Discuss the commonly accepted evolution of the universe as a solution to this paradox.
The core of a star collapses during a supernova, forming a neutron star. Angular momentum of the core is conserved, and so the neutron star spins rapidly. If the initial core radius is\({\rm{5 \times 1}}{{\rm{0}}^{\rm{5}}}{\rm{ km}}\)and it collapses to\({\rm{10}}{\rm{.0 km}}\), find the neutron star’s angular velocity in revolutions per second, given the core’s angular velocity was originally\({\rm{1}}\)revolution per\({\rm{30}}\)days.
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.