(a) A particle and its antiparticle are at rest relative to an observer and annihilate (completely destroying both masses), creating two\({\rm{\gamma }}\)rays of equal energy. What is the characteristic\({\rm{\gamma }}\)-ray energy you would look for if searching for evidence of proton-antiproton annihilation? (The fact that such radiation is rarely observed is evidence that there is very little antimatter in the universe.) (b) How does this compare with the\({\rm{0}}{\rm{.511 MeV}}\)energy associated with electron-positron annihilation?

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. The characteristics of\(\gamma \)rays are found to be\(939\,{\rm{MeV}}\).
  2. The proton-antiproton annihilation energy is \(1.84 \times {10^3}\) times greater than electron-positron annihilation.

Step by step solution

01

Energy expression

In case of the annihilation if the mass gets converted into the energy. If we get value of total mass destroyed then the expression for the energy is obtained by,

\(E = m{c^2}\)

Here\(E\)is the energy,\(m\)is the mass and\(c\)is the speed of the light.

02

Evaluating the part a

We are using the conservation of energy and then evaluate:

\(E = {m_p}{c^2}\)

Here\({m_p}\)is the mass of the proton,

Substitute\(1.67 \times {10^{ - 27}}\,{\rm{kg}}\)for\({m_p}\)and\(3 \times {10^8}\,{\rm{m/s}}\)for\(c\)in the above equation.

\(\begin{array}{c}E = \left( {1.67 \times {{10}^{ - 27}}} \right){\left( {3 \times {{10}^8}} \right)^2}\\ = 15.0536 \times {10^{ - 11}}\,{\rm{J}}\end{array}\)

Convert into\({\rm{MeV}}\)

\(\begin{array}{c}E = \left( {15.05 \times {{10}^{ - 11}}\,{\rm{J}}} \right)\left( {6.242 \times {{10}^{12}}\,\frac{{{\rm{MeV}}}}{{\rm{J}}}} \right)\\ = 939\,{\rm{MeV}}\end{array}\)

Therefore the characteristics of \(\gamma \) rays are found to be \(939\,{\rm{MeV}}\).

03

Evaluating the part b

Now compare the above calculated value with \(0.511\,\,{\rm{MeV}}\),

\(\begin{array}{c}Ratio = \frac{{939}}{{0.511}}\\ = 1.84 \times {10^3}\end{array}\)

Therefore the proton-antiproton annihilation energy is \(1.84 \times {10^3}\) times greater than electron-positron annihilation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Distances to very remote galaxies are estimated based on their apparent type, which indicate the number of stars in the galaxy, and their measured brightness. Explain how the measured brightness would vary with distance. Would there be any correction necessary to compensate for the red shift of the galaxy (all distant galaxies have significant red shifts)? Discuss possible causes of uncertainties in these measurements.

Lacking direct evidence of WIMPs as dark matter, why must we eliminate all other possible explanations based on the known forms of matter before we invoke their existence?

(a) What is the approximate force of gravity on a\({\rm{70 - kg}}\)person due to the Andromeda galaxy, assuming its total mass is\({\rm{1}}{{\rm{0}}^{{\rm{13}}}}\)that of our Sun and acts like a single mass\({\rm{2 Mly}}\)away? (b) What is the ratio of this force to the person’s weight? Note that Andromeda is the closest large galaxy.

Distances to the nearest stars (up to\({\rm{500 ly}}\)away) can be measured by a technique called parallax, as shown in Figure\({\rm{34}}{\rm{.26}}\). What are the angles\({{\rm{\theta }}_{\rm{1}}}\)and\({{\rm{\theta }}_{\rm{2}}}\)relative to the plane of the Earth’s orbit for a star\({\rm{4}}{\rm{.0 ly}}\)directly above the Sun?

Olbers’s paradox poses an interesting question: If the universe is infinite, then any line of sight should eventually fall on a star’s surface. Why then is the sky dark at night? Discuss the commonly accepted evolution of the universe as a solution to this paradox.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free