(a) Calculate the approximate age of the universe from the average value of the Hubble constant,\({{\rm{H}}_{\rm{0}}}{\rm{ = 20km/s}} \cdot {\rm{Mly}}\). To do this, calculate the time it would take to travel\({\rm{1 Mly}}\)at a constant expansion rate of\({\rm{20 km/s}}\). (b) If deceleration is taken into account, would the actual age of the universe be greater or less than that found here? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The age of the universe is obtained as: \(t = {\rm{ 1}}{\rm{.5 \times 1}}{{\rm{0}}^{{\rm{14}}}}{\rm{ y}}\).

(b) The actual age of the universe will be less.

Step by step solution

01

Recession velocity

The recession velocity for a galaxy is given by,

\(v = {H_o}d\)

Here\({H_o}\)is the Hubble constant and\(d\)is the distance to the galaxy.

02

Evaluating the age

Taking the edge of the universe having \({\rm{10 Gly}}\) away from us, we then obtain:

\(\begin{array}{c}t = \frac{D}{v}\\ = \frac{{{\rm{1}}{{\rm{0}}^{{\rm{10}}}}{\rm{ \times 3 \times 1}}{{\rm{0}}^{\rm{8}}}{\rm{m/s}}}}{{{\rm{20}}\,{\rm{km/s}}}}y\\ = {\rm{1}}{\rm{.5 \times 1}}{{\rm{0}}^{{\rm{14}}}}{\rm{ y}}\end{array}\)

Therefore, the age of the universe is \({\rm{1}}{\rm{.5 \times 1}}{{\rm{0}}^{{\rm{14}}}}{\rm{ y}}\).

03

Explanation for part b

As, we haven't factored in deceleration, this time is really \({\rm{1}}{{\rm{0}}^{\rm{4}}}\) times shorter, therefore it's an overestimate.

Therefore, the age of the universe is less.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Find the approximate mass of the dark and luminous matter in the Milky Way galaxy. Assume the luminous matter is due to approximately \({\rm{1}}{{\rm{0}}^{{\rm{11}}}}\) stars of average mass \({\rm{1}}{\rm{.5}}\) times that of our Sun, and take the dark matter to be \({\rm{10}}\) times as massive as the luminous matter.

Supermassive black holes are thought to exist at the center of many galaxies. (a) What is the radius of such an object if it has a mass of\({\rm{1}}{{\rm{0}}^{\rm{9}}}\)Suns? (b) What is this radius in light years?

Consider a star moving in a circular orbit at the edge of a galaxy. Construct a problem in which you calculate the mass of that galaxy in kg and in multiples of the solar mass based on the velocity of the star and its distance from the center of the galaxy.

The core of a star collapses during a supernova, forming a neutron star. Angular momentum of the core is conserved, and so the neutron star spins rapidly. If the initial core radius is\({\rm{5 \times 1}}{{\rm{0}}^{\rm{5}}}{\rm{ km}}\)and it collapses to\({\rm{10}}{\rm{.0 km}}\), find the neutron star’s angular velocity in revolutions per second, given the core’s angular velocity was originally\({\rm{1}}\)revolution per\({\rm{30}}\)days.

(a) A particle and its antiparticle are at rest relative to an observer and annihilate (completely destroying both masses), creating two\({\rm{\gamma }}\)rays of equal energy. What is the characteristic\({\rm{\gamma }}\)-ray energy you would look for if searching for evidence of proton-antiproton annihilation? (The fact that such radiation is rarely observed is evidence that there is very little antimatter in the universe.) (b) How does this compare with the\({\rm{0}}{\rm{.511 MeV}}\)energy associated with electron-positron annihilation?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free