How can quarks, which are fermions, combine to form bosons? Why must an even number combine to form a boson? Give one example by stating the quark substructure of a boson.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Their spins (which are that integer) must add up to an integer value for a combined particle to be a boson, which is not possible for an odd number of constituents.

Step by step solution

01

Concept Introduction

The interplay of physical forces, such as electromagnetism and maybe even gravity, is controlled by bosons, which are sometimes referred to as force particles.

02

Explanation

Bosons have an integer spin, whereas fermions have a half integer spin. When two particles with spin \({{\rm{S}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{/}}{{\rm{S}}_{\rm{2}}}\)and spin projection on one axis \({\rm{S}}_{\rm{1}}^{\rm{z}}{\rm{/S}}_{\rm{2}}^{\rm{z}}\)collide, the final particle's spin is not uniquely determined, i.e., it can take on different values. Simply put, the spin orientation of the component particles determines this. The projection on one axis is determined in a unique way.

\({{\rm{S}}^{\rm{z}}}{\rm{ = S}}_{\rm{1}}^{\rm{z}}{\rm{ + S}}_{\rm{2}}^{\rm{z}}\)

while boundaries are imposed on the total spin

\(\left| {{S^z}} \right| \le S \le \left| {{S_1} + {S_2}} \right|\)

For reasons outside the scope of this response, spin values are quantized so that only \({\rm{1/2}}\) multiples are permitted, and one particle may only differ by multiples of 1, i.e., if \({\rm{S = 1}}\), possible projection values are \({{\rm{S}}_{\rm{z}}}{\rm{ = - 1,0,1}}\) (e.g. \({{\rm{S}}^{\rm{z}}}{\rm{ = 1/2}}\)is not allowed despite satisfying (2)). Quarks, which are fermions, can be combined so that the resulting particle's total spin is an integer. Because fermions have half integer values, their spin projections have half integer values as well, hence \({\rm{S}}_{\rm{1}}^{\rm{z}}{\rm{ = }}\frac{{\rm{m}}}{{\rm{2}}}\)and \({\rm{S}}_{\rm{2}}^{\rm{z}}{\rm{ = }}\frac{{\rm{n}}}{{\rm{2}}}\) may be written, where, \({\rm{m}}\)and\(n\)are odd integers. The spin projection of the final particle would therefore be derived from (2).

\(\begin{array}{c}{S^z} = \frac{m}{2} + \frac{n}{2}\\ = \frac{{m + n}}{2}\end{array}\)

However, because the combination of two odd integers is an even number, the final particle has an integer spin and is thus a boson. The right-hand side of \(\left( {\rm{3}} \right)\)would look like \(\frac{{m + n + p}}{2}\)if there were an odd number of fermion components, where \({\rm{m,n,p}}\)are all odd numbers. Their sum would therefore be an odd number, resulting in a half-integer projection, which would categories the final particle as fermionic. Consider a particle made composed of an up quark (spin \({\rm{1/2}}\)and a down antiquark (spin \({\rm{1/2}}\)). Because they don't have a fixed projection value, any value for the final spin is acceptable, therefore we can have \({\rm{S = 1}}\) (which we get because the spins are aligned, \({\rm{1/2 + 1/2 = 1}}\)) or \({\rm{S = 0}}\) (which we get because the spins are opposite, \({\rm{1/2 - 1/2 = 0}}\)) which corresponds to a pion. Both bosons are particles.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Synchrotron radiation takes energy from an accelerator beam and is related to acceleration. Why would you expect the problem to be more severe for electron accelerators than proton accelerators?

When an electron and positron collide at the SLAC facility, they each have 50.0GeV kinetic energies. What is the total collision energy available, taking into account the annihilation energy? Note that the annihilation energy is insignificant, because the electrons are highly relativistic.

(a) Is the decay \({{\rm{\Lambda }}^{\rm{0}}} \to {\rm{n + }}{{\rm{\pi }}^{\rm{0}}}\) possible considering the appropriate conservation laws? State why or why not.

(b) Write the decay in terms of the quark constituents of the particles.

The mass of a theoretical particle that may be associated with the unification of the electroweak and strong forces is\[{\rm{1}}{{\rm{0}}^{{\rm{14}}}}{\rm{ GeV/}}{{\rm{c}}^{\rm{2}}}\]. (a) How many proton masses is this? (b) How many electron masses is this? (This indicates how extremely relativistic the accelerator would have to be in order to make the particle, and how large the relativistic quantity γ would have to be.)

Plans for an accelerator that produces a secondary beam of \({\rm{K}}\)-mesons to scatter from nuclei, for the purpose of studying the strong force, call for them to have a kinetic energy of \({\rm{500 MeV}}\).

(a) What would the relativistic quantity \(\gamma {\rm{ = }}\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{\sqrt {{\rm{1 - }}{{{{\rm{\nu }}^{\rm{2}}}} \mathord{\left/{\vphantom {{{{\rm{\nu }}^{\rm{2}}}} {{{\rm{c}}^{\rm{2}}}}}} \right. \\} {{{\rm{c}}^{\rm{2}}}}}} }}\) be for these particles?

(b) How long would their average lifetime be in the laboratory?

(c) How far could they travel in this time?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free