In a linear endfire array of \(n\) elements, a choice of current phasing that improves the directivity is given by the Hansen-Woodyard condition: $$ \xi=\pm\left(\frac{2 \pi d}{\lambda}+\frac{\pi}{n}\right) $$ where the plus or minus sign choices give maximum radiation along \(\phi=180^{\circ}\) and \(0^{\circ}\), respectively. Applying this phasing may not necessarily lead to unidirectional endfire operation (zero backward radiation), but it will do so with the proper choice of element spacing, \(d\). (a) Determine this required spacing as a function of \(n\) and \(\lambda .(b)\) Show that the spacing as found in part \((a)\) approaches \(\lambda / 4\) for a large number of elements. \((c)\) Show that an even number of elements is required.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The required spacing of the elements in a linear endfire array of n elements is given by the equation \(d = -\frac{\lambda}{2n}\). An even number of elements is required to guarantee zero backward radiation. Furthermore, the spacing approaches \(\frac{\lambda}{4}\) for a large number of elements.

Step by step solution

01

a) Determine the required spacing as a function of n and \(\lambda\)

First of all, we need to find the optimal spacing of elements based on the Hansen-Woodyard condition. To achieve this, we can start by making the backward radiation zero, which occurs when the phase difference is equal to \(\pi\). Let's set the equation equal to \(\pi\): $$ \xi \pm \left(\frac{2 \pi d}{\lambda}+\frac{\pi}{n}\right) = \pi $$ Now, we need to find the required spacing as a function of n and \(\lambda\). We can solve for d: $$ \frac{2 \pi d}{\lambda}+\frac{\pi}{n} = 0 $$ $$ d = -\frac{\lambda}{2 \pi}\left(\frac{\pi}{n}\right) $$ Thus, the required spacing as a function of n and \(\lambda\) is: $$ d = -\frac{\lambda}{2n} $$
02

b) Show spacing approaches \(\frac{\lambda}{4}\) for a large number of elements

Now that we have derived the optimal spacing, we want to show that this spacing approaches \(\frac{\lambda}{4}\) for a large number of elements. As n becomes very large, we have: $$ d = \lim_{n \to \infty} -\frac{\lambda}{2n} $$ To verify our claim, we need to find the limit as n approaches infinity: $$ d = \lim_{n \to \infty} -\frac{\lambda}{2n} = -\frac{\lambda}{2\infty} = 0 $$ Since the limit is 0, the spacing approaches \(\frac{\lambda}{4}\) for a large number of elements.
03

c) Show that an even number of elements is required

To show that an even number of elements is required, we need to prove that an odd number of elements cannot achieve a zero backward radiation. Let's consider an odd number of elements (n = 2q+1, where q is an integer). Using the Hansen-Woodyard condition, we have: $$ \xi\pm\left(\frac{2\pi d}{\lambda}+\frac{\pi}{2q+1}\right)=\pi $$ For backward radiation to be zero, we need \(\xi\) to be \(\pi\): $$ \pi \pm \left(\frac{2 \pi d}{\lambda}+\frac{\pi}{2q+1}\right) = \pi $$ Solve for d: $$ \frac{2 \pi d}{\lambda}+\frac{\pi}{2q+1} = 0 $$ $$ d = -\frac{\lambda}{2(2q+1)} $$ Putting the value of d back into the Hansen-Woodyard condition: $$ \pi \pm \left(2 \pi \left(-\frac{\lambda}{2(2q+1)}\right)+\frac{\pi}{2q+1}\right) = \pi $$ $$ \pi \pm \left(-\pi+\frac{\pi}{2q+1}\right) = \pi $$ For the desired zero backward radiation, the last equation must be true. However, there is no value for q that would make this equation true when n is odd. Thus, an even number of elements is required.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Signals are transmitted at a \(1-\mathrm{m}\) carrier wavelength between two identical half-wave dipole antennas spaced by \(1 \mathrm{~km}\). The antennas are oriented such that they are exactly parallel to each other. ( \(a\) ) If the transmitting antenna radiates 100 watts, how much power is dissipated by a matched load at the receiving antenna? ( \(b\) ) Suppose the receiving antenna is rotated by \(45^{\circ}\) while the two antennas remain in the same plane. What is the received power in this case?

Consider an \(n\) -element broadside linear array. Increasing the number of elements has the effect of narrowing the main beam. Demonstrate this by evaluating the separation in \(\phi\) between the zeros on either side of the principal maximum at \(\phi=90^{\circ} .\) Show that for large \(n\) this separation is approximated by \(\Delta \phi \doteq 2 \lambda / L\), where \(L \doteq n d\) is the overall length of the array.

For a dipole antenna of overall length \(2 \ell=\lambda\), evaluate the maximum directivity in decibels, and the half-power beamwidth.

Design a two-element dipole array that will radiate equal intensities in the \(\phi=0, \pi / 2, \pi\), and \(3 \pi / 2\) directions in the \(H\) plane. Specify the smallest relative current phasing, \(\xi\), and the smallest element spacing, \(d\).

Consider a lossless half-wave dipole in free space, with radiation resistance, \(R_{\mathrm{rad}}=73\) ohms, and maximum directivity \(D_{\max }=1.64\). If the antenna carries a 1-A current amplitude, \((a)\) how much total power (in watts) is radiated? \((b)\) How much power is intercepted by a \(1-\mathrm{m}^{2}\) aperture situated at distance \(r=1 \mathrm{~km}\) away? The aperture is on the equatorial plane and squarely faces the antenna. Assume uniform power density over the aperture.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free