Chapter 35: Problem 57
If the dot behaves as a perfectly cubical 3 -D square well, the ground state is a. non degenerate. b. twofold degenerate. c. threefold degenerate. d. You can't tell without knowing the energy.
Chapter 35: Problem 57
If the dot behaves as a perfectly cubical 3 -D square well, the ground state is a. non degenerate. b. twofold degenerate. c. threefold degenerate. d. You can't tell without knowing the energy.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeIs quantization significant for macro molecules confined to biological cells? To find out, consider a protein of mass 250,000 u confined to a \(10 \mu \mathrm{m}\) -diameter cell. Treating this as a particle in a one-dimensional square well, find the energy difference between the ground state and the first excited state. Given that biochemical reactions typically involve energies on the order of \(1 \mathrm{eV}\), what do you conclude about the role of quantization?
The ground-state energy for an electron in infinite square well \(A\) is equal to the energy of the first excited state for an electron in well B. How do the wells' widths compare?
Sketch the probability density for the \(n=2\) state of an infinite square well extending from \(x=0\) to \(x=L\), and determine where the particle is most likely to be found.
What did Einstein mean by his remark, loosely paraphrased, that "God does not play dice"?
A \(9-\) W laser beam shines on an ensemble of \(10^{24}\) electrons, each in the ground state of a one-dimensional infinite square well \(0.72 \mathrm{nm}\) wide. The photon energy is just high enough to raise an electron to its first excited state. How many electrons can be excited if the beam shines for \(10 \mathrm{ms} ?\)
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.