Chapter 2: Problem 6
What is the key difference in the modeling assumptions between the \(\mathrm{EOQ}\) and the Wagner-Whitin models?
Chapter 2: Problem 6
What is the key difference in the modeling assumptions between the \(\mathrm{EOQ}\) and the Wagner-Whitin models?
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeGive at least three criticisms of the validity of the Wapner-Whitin model.
Suppose you are stocking parts purchased from vendors in a warehouse. How could you use a ( \(Q, r\) ) model to determine whether a vendor of a part with a higher price but a shorter lead time is offering a good deal? What other factors should you consider in deciding to change vendors?
Harris, in the original 1913 paper on the \(\mathrm{EOQ}\) model, suggested that "most managers, indeed, have a rather hazy idea as to just what this [setup] cost amounts to." a. Do you think that setup cost, as defined in the EOQ model, is more easily specified today than in 1913 ? Why or why not? b. Give some examples of costs that might make up this setup cost. c. What might setup cost in the model actually be serving as a surrogate for in the real system?
Consider the following situations. Label them as either A for appropriate or \(L\) for less appropriate for application of the \(\mathrm{EOQ}\) model. a. Automobile manufacturer ordering screws from a vendor b. Automobile manufacturer deciding on how many cars to paint per batch of a particular color A job shop ordering bar stock d. Office ordering copier paper A steel company deciding how many slabs to move at once between the casting furnace and the rolling mill
Why is the statement "The reorder point \(r\) affects customer service, while the replenishment quantity \(Q\) affects replenishment frequency" true in rough terms but not precisely true?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.