On a day without any wind, your car consumes \(x\) gallons of gasoline when you drive at a constant speed, \(U\), from point \(A\) to point \(B\) and back to point \(A\). Assume that you repeat the journey. driving at the same speed, on another day when there is a steady wind blowing from \(B\) to \(A\). Would you expect your fuel consumption to be less than, equal to, or greater than \(x\) gallons for this windy round-trip? Support your answer with appropriate analysis.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The overall fuel consumption for a round trip with a headwind and tailwind is expected to be higher than for a trip with no wind. This is due to the fact that the increase in fuel consumption when the car fights against the wind on the way to \(B\) is not entirely compensated by the decrease in fuel consumption on the way back to \(A\) with the tailwind. The asymmetry is because the fuel consumption depends on the square of the speed relative to the air, and hence the square of the sum is greater than the sum of the squares.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the relative Speeds

When going against the wind from point \(A\) to \(B\), the relative speed to the air becomes \(U + W\). Returning from \(A\) to \(B\) with the wind, the speed relative to the wind is \(U - W\).
02

Consider the relative Fuel consumption

The fuel consumption is going to be higher when going against the wind due to the increased air resistance. When going with the wind, the consumption will be lower due to the decreased air resistance.
03

Compare Fuel consumption

While the fuel consumption is lessened on the way back, it is increased on the way there, with the increase being exponential due to the increased air resistance.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A \(1.2-1 b\) kite with an area of \(6 \mathrm{ft}^{2}\) flies in a \(20-\mathrm{ft} / \mathrm{s}\) wind such that the weightless string makes an angle of \(55^{\circ}\) relative to the horizontal. If the pull on the string is 1.5 lb, determine the lift and drag coefficients based on the kite area.

(See The Wide World of Fluids article "At \(12,600 \mathrm{mpg}\) It Doesn't cost Much to 'Fill 'er Up," section 9.3.3.) (a) Determine the power it takes to overcome aerodynamic drag on a small \(\left(6 \mathrm{ft}^{2}\right.\) cross section), streamlined \(\left(C_{D}=0.12\right)\) vehicle traveling \(15 \mathrm{mph}\) (b) Compare the power calculated in part (a) with that for a large \(\left(36 \mathrm{ft}^{2} \text { cross-sectional area }\right),\) nonstreamlined \(\left(C_{D}=0.48\right) \mathrm{SUV}\) traveling 65 mph on the interstate.

Consider the following cases. (a) A small 0.6 -in.-long fish swims with a speed of 0.8 in/s. Would a boundary layer type flow be developed along the sides of the fish? Explain. (b) A \(12-f t\) -long kayak moves with a speed of \(5 \mathrm{ft} / \mathrm{s}\). Would a boundary layer type flow be developed along the sides of the boat? Explain.

A 2 -mm-diameter meteor of specific gravity 2.9 has a speed of \(6 \mathrm{km} / \mathrm{s}\) at an altitude of \(50,000 \mathrm{m}\) where the air density is \(1.03 \times\) \(10^{-3} \mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{m}^{3} .\) If the drag coefficient at this large Mach number condition is \(1.5,\) determine the deceleration of the meteor

A laminar boundary layer velocity profile is approximated by \(u / U=[2-(y / \delta)](y / \delta)\) for \(y \leq \delta,\) and \(u=U\) for \(y>\delta\) (a) Show that this parabolic profile satisfies the appropriate boundary conditions. (b) Use the momentum integral equation to determine the boundary layer thickness, \(\delta=\delta(x)\). Compare the result with the exact Blasius solution.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free