A 68 kgskydiver falls at a constant terminal speed of 59 m/s. (a) At what rate is the gravitational potential energy of the Earth–skydiver system being reduced? (b) At what rate is the system’s mechanical energy being reduced?

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. The rate at which gravitational potential energy is reduced is -3.9×104J/s.
  2. The system’s mechanical energy is being reduced at -3.9×104J/s.

Step by step solution

01

The given data

The Mass of the sky diver is, m=68 kg

The velocity of the skydiver is, v=59 m/s

02

Understanding the concept of energy

The rate of gravitational potential energy is a product of mass, acceleration due to gravity, and velocity. This is used to find the rate of gravitational potential energy.

Formula:

The force of the body using the rate of potential energy, Fx=-d(x)dxx (1)

03

a) Calculation of the rate at which gravitational potential energy is reduced

Using equation (1), the rate at which gravitational potential energy is reduced is given as:

F(x)=dU(x)dtdxdtF(x)=-dUxdtvxF(x)×vx=dUxdtm×g×vx=-dUxdtdUxdt=-68kg×9.8m/s2×59m/sdUxdt=-3.9×104J/s

Hence, the value of the rate of energy is -3.9×104J/s.

04

b) Calculation of the reduction of the rate of the mechanical energy

Since velocity is constant, the rate of change of kinetic energy is zero.

The rate of mechanical energy is the rate of potential energy.

So, the rate at which the mechanical energy is reduced is -3.9×104J/s.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The summit of Mount Everest is 8850 mabove sea level. (a) How much energy would a 90 kgclimber expand against the gravitational force on him in climbing to the summit from sea level? (b) How many candy bars, at 1.25 MJper bar, would supply an energy equivalent to this? Your answer should suggest that work done against the gravitational force is a very small part of the energy expended in climbing a mountain.

A spring with spring constant k = 620 N/mis placed in a vertical orientation with its lower end supported by a horizontal surface. The upper end is depressed 25 cm, and a block with a weight of 50 Nis placed (unattached) on the depressed spring. The system is then released from rest. Assume that the gravitational potential energy Ugof the block is zero at the release point role="math" localid="1661235142508" (y=0)and calculate the kinetic energyof the block forequal to (a) 0, (b) 0.050 m, (c) 0.10 m, (d) 0.15 m, and (e) 0.20 m. Also, (f) how far above its point of release does the block rise?

In Fig. 8-32, a ice flake is released from the edge of a hemisphere bowl whose radius ris 22.0 cm. The flake-bowl contact is frictionless. (a) How much work is done on the flake by the gravitational force during the flake’s descent to the bottom of the bowl? (b) What is the change in the potential energy of the flake-Earth system during that descent? (c) If that potential energy is taken to be zero at the bottom of the bowl, what is its value when the flake is released? (d) If, instead, the potential energy is taken to be zero at the release point, what is its value when the flake reaches the bottom of the bowl? (e) If the mass of the flake were doubled, would the magnitudes of the answers to (a) through (b) increase, decrease, or remain the same?

A sprinter who weighs670 Nruns the first 7.0 mof a race in1.6 s, starting from rest and accelerating uniformly. What are the sprinter’s

  1. Speed and
  2. Kinetic energy at the end of the1.6 s?
  3. What average power does the sprinter generate during the1.6 sinterval?

A 9.40 kgprojectile is fired vertically upward. Air drag decreases the mechanical energy of the projectile-Earth system by 68.0 kJduring the projectile’s ascent. How much higher would the projectile have gone were air drag negligible?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free