What is a practical way of checking if the round-off error has been significant in calculations?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Explain a practical way to check if the round-off error has been significant in calculations. Answer: To check if the round-off error has been significant in calculations, perform the following steps: 1. Perform the calculation without round-off errors, keeping track of the full decimal representation of intermediate results. 2. Perform the same calculation with round-off errors, rounding intermediate values to an appropriate number of decimal places. 3. Calculate the relative error (RE) by finding the difference between the results in step 1 and step 2 and dividing this difference by the absolute value of the more accurate result. 4. Compare the relative error to a predetermined tolerance value. If the relative error is less than the tolerance value, the round-off error is considered insignificant. For most practical applications, a tolerance value of at most 0.01 (1%) can be used, but this should be adjusted based on the required accuracy for the specific problem.

Step by step solution

01

Perform the calculation without round-off errors

First, perform the given calculation without rounding off any intermediate values. Keep track of every intermediate result in its full decimal representation, without rounding.
02

Perform the calculation with round-off errors

Next, perform the same calculation but this time round off intermediate values to an appropriate number of decimal places (for example, to two decimal places). Keep track of the rounded values as you perform the calculation.
03

Calculate the relative error

Now, compare the results of the calculations performed in steps 1 and 2 by finding the difference between the two values and dividing this difference by the absolute value of the more accurate result (without rounding). This will give you the relative error (RE). For example, if the accurate result is A and the rounded result is R, then: Relative Error (RE) = |(A-R)| / |A|
04

Determine the significance of the round-off error

Finally, to determine if the round-off error has been significant in the calculation, compare the relative error to a predetermined tolerance value. If the relative error is less than the tolerance value, then the round-off error can be considered insignificant. In general, a tolerance value of at most 0.01 (1%) is often considered acceptable for most practical applications, but the tolerance value should be adjusted based on how accurate the result is required to be for the specific problem you are working on.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Relative Error Calculation
Understanding the concept of relative error is crucial when dealing with numerical computations. To put it simply, relative error measures how much the approximate value deviates from the exact value, relative to the size of the exact value. It's expressed as a fraction or a percentage.

Here's a practical approach to calculate it. Once you've obtained both the accurate result (\textbf{A}) and the rounded result (\textbf{R}), find their difference and take the absolute value. Then, divide this by the absolute value of the accurate result. The formula looks like this: \[ \text{Relative Error (RE)} = \frac{|A - R|}{|A|} \] This calculation provides a dimensionless measure of error, which is particularly useful because it allows for the comparison of errors across different scales and magnitudes of measurements.

As an educator, I encourage students to always verify their numerical results by calculating the relative error. This practice not only helps to understand the accuracy of your calculation but also bolsters your analytical skills in assessing the quality of your results.
Error Significance Determination
After calculating the relative error, the next big question is: How do we know if this error matters? In other words, we need to determine the significance of the round-off error.

For this, a tolerance value is set as a benchmark, which can vary depending on the context. In academics or industry, it's common to use a default value of 0.01 (or 1%) for many applications. If the relative error you've computed is below this tolerance, you can generally breathe a sigh of relief - your computations are sufficiently accurate. If not, it means the round-off error is significant, and the impact needs further evaluation.

For instance, in engineering, a significant round-off error might result in a flawed design, while in finances, it could lead to substantial monetary discrepancies. Always remember to use a tolerance that aligns with the precision requirements of your specific task. By incorporating an understanding of error significance, students become better equipped to make decisions on when to use more precise calculations.
Numeric Computation Precision
When performing calculations, precision is key. The precision of numeric computation refers to how detailed a numerical value is in terms of the number of digits used to represent it. For example, the value 3.14159 is more precise than 3.14 because it contains more decimal places.

In the context of round-off errors, precision plays a determining role. The more decimal places you include in intermediate calculations, the less likely you are to encounter significant round-off errors. However, at the same time, working with too many decimal places can be unnecessarily complicated and time-consuming.

Striking the right balance is essential. Use enough precision to ensure accuracy, but avoid excess that doesn't add value. Additionally, modern computing devices and software can handle very precise calculations quite efficiently. Encouraging students to use appropriate tools and understand the capabilities of their computing resources can greatly reduce the risks of round-off errors. Lastly, when documenting calculations, emphasize the importance of consistency in the level of precision to maintain clarity and repeatability in numerical work.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Using EES (or other) software, solve these systems of algebraic equations. (a) $$ \begin{array}{r} 3 x_{1}-x_{2}+3 x_{3}=0 \\ -x_{1}+2 x_{2}+x_{3}=3 \\ 2 x_{1}-x_{2}-x_{3}=2 \end{array} $$ (b) $$ \begin{aligned} 4 x_{1}-2 x_{2}^{2}+0.5 x_{3} &=-2 \\ x_{1}^{3}-x_{2}+x_{3} &=11.964 \\ x_{1}+x_{2}+x_{3} &=3 \end{aligned} $$

Consider transient heat conduction in a plane wall with variable heat generation and constant thermal conductivity. The nodal network of the medium consists of nodes \(0,1,2,3,4\), and 5 with a uniform nodal spacing of \(\Delta x\). The wall is initially at a specified temperature. Using the energy balance approach, obtain the explicit finite difference formulation of the boundary nodes for the case of insulation at the left boundary (node 0 ) and radiation at the right boundary (node 5) with an emissivity of \(\varepsilon\) and surrounding temperature of \(T_{\text {surr }}\).

Starting with an energy balance on the volume element, obtain the three- dimensional transient explicit finite difference equation for a general interior node in rectangular coordinates for \(T(x, y, z, t)\) for the case of constant thermal conductivity and no heat generation.

Consider steady two-dimensional heat conduction in a square cross section \((3 \mathrm{~cm} \times 3 \mathrm{~cm}, k=20 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}, \alpha=\) \(6.694 \times 10^{-6} \mathrm{~m}^{2} / \mathrm{s}\) ) with constant prescribed temperature of \(100^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and \(300^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) at the top and bottom surfaces, respectively. The left surface is exposed to a constant heat flux of \(1000 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\) while the right surface is in contact with a convective environment \(\left(h=45 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\right)\) at \(20^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). Using a uniform mesh size of \(\Delta x=\Delta y\), determine \((a)\) finite difference equations and \((b)\) the nodal temperatures using Gauss-Seidel iteration method.

Design a fire-resistant safety box whose outer dimensions are \(0.5 \mathrm{~m} \times 0.5 \mathrm{~m} \times 0.5 \mathrm{~m}\) that will protect its combustible contents from fire which may last up to \(2 \mathrm{~h}\). Assume the box will be exposed to an environment at an average temperature of \(700^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) with a combined heat transfer coefficient of \(70 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\) and the temperature inside the box must be below \(150^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) at the end of \(2 \mathrm{~h}\). The cavity of the box must be as large as possible while meeting the design constraints, and the insulation material selected must withstand the high temperatures to which it will be exposed. Cost, durability, and strength are also important considerations in the selection of insulation materials.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free