How is an insulated boundary handled in finite difference formulation of a problem? How does a symmetry line differ from an insulated boundary in the finite difference formulation?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Short Answer: In the finite difference formulation, an insulated boundary is handled by setting the temperature gradient at the boundary to zero. This condition can be applied to the finite difference equations at the insulated boundary, which will update the temperature to fulfill the condition. On the other hand, a symmetry line is handled by ensuring the symmetry of the solution along the line, which can be incorporated by applying a condition that the temperature gradient is zero or constant at the symmetry line. These conditions are used to update the temperature field according to their respective boundary conditions, thus making them different in the finite difference formulation.

Step by step solution

01

1. Insulated Boundary:

An insulated boundary, or adiabatic boundary, is a boundary condition applied in some heat transfer or fluid flow problems that states there is no heat transfer across the boundary. In other words, the boundary is assumed to be a perfect insulator, and the heat flow rate is zero.
02

2. Symmetry Line:

A symmetry line is a boundary condition applied in problems when the physical properties or the solution of the problem is symmetric with respect to a line or plane. The implementation of a symmetry line in the finite difference formulation involves understanding that derivatives of the solution are zero or constant along the symmetry line.
03

3. Handling Insulated Boundaries in Finite Difference Formulation:

In the finite difference formulation, an insulated boundary can be represented by setting the temperature gradient at the boundary to zero. Considering a one-dimensional heat conduction problem, the insulated boundary condition can be approximated using the finite difference method as follows: At the insulated boundary (x = L), the heat flux is zero: \(\frac{dT}{dx} |_{x=L} = 0\) Using a backward finite difference to approximate the temperature gradient at the boundary: \(\frac{T_L - T_{L-1}}{\Delta x} = 0\) Thus, the temperature at the insulated boundary can be expressed as: \(T_L = T_{L-1}\) This condition can be applied to the finite difference equations at the insulated boundary, which will update the temperature accordingly to fulfill the condition.
04

4. Handling Symmetry Lines in Finite Difference Formulation:

Symmetry lines can also affect how the finite difference formulation is applied. For example, in a two-dimensional problem, when the problem's solution is symmetric along the x-axis (y = 0), then the temperature gradient concerning the y-direction is zero at the symmetry line: \(\frac{\partial T}{\partial y} |_{y=0} = 0\) Using the central difference scheme to approximate the temperature gradient at the symmetry line: \(\frac{T_{i,j+1} - T_{i,j-1}}{2\Delta y} = 0\) Rearranging the expression, we get: \(T_{i,j+1} = T_{i,j-1}\) The condition can be applied to the finite difference equations at the symmetry line, ensuring the symmetry of the temperature field about the symmetry line. In summary, insulated boundaries and symmetry lines differ in the finite difference formulation by different conditions: no heat transfer across the boundary (temperature gradient equal to zero) for insulated boundaries, and symmetry of the problem solution (symmetric temperature distribution) for symmetry lines. These conditions are used to update the temperature field according to their respective boundary conditions.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What are the limitations of the analytical solution methods?

Consider a 2-m-long and 0.7-m-wide stainless-steel plate whose thickness is \(0.1 \mathrm{~m}\). The left surface of the plate is exposed to a uniform heat flux of \(2000 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\) while the right surface of the plate is exposed to a convective environment at \(0^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) with \(h=400 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\). The thermal conductivity of the stainless steel plate can be assumed to vary linearly with temperature range as \(k(T)=k_{o}(1+\beta T)\) where \(k_{o}=48 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}\) and \(\beta=9.21 \times 10^{-4}{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}^{-1}\). The stainless steel plate experiences a uniform volumetric heat generation at a rate of \(8 \times 10^{5} \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\). Assuming steady state one-dimensional heat transfer, determine the temperature distribution along the plate thickness.

Consider transient one-dimensional heat conduction in a pin fin of constant diameter \(D\) with constant thermal conductivity. The fin is losing heat by convection to the ambient air at \(T_{\infty}\) with a heat transfer coefficient of \(h\) and by radiation to the surrounding surfaces at an average temperature of \(T_{\text {surr }}\). The nodal network of the fin consists of nodes 0 (at the base), 1 (in the middle), and 2 (at the fin tip) with a uniform nodal spacing of \(\Delta x\). Using the energy balance approach, obtain the explicit finite difference formulation of this problem for the case of a specified temperature at the fin base and negligible heat transfer at the fin tip.

Consider transient two-dimensional heat conduction in a rectangular region that is to be solved by the explicit method. If all boundaries of the region are either insulated or at specified temperatures, express the stability criterion for this problem in its simplest form.

Consider a medium in which the finite difference formulation of a general interior node is given in its simplest form as $$ \frac{T_{m-1}-2 T_{m}+T_{m+1}}{\Delta x^{2}}+\frac{\dot{e}_{m}}{k}=0 $$ (a) Is heat transfer in this medium steady or transient? (b) Is heat transfer one-, two-, or three-dimensional? (c) Is there heat generation in the medium? (d) Is the nodal spacing constant or variable? (e) Is the thermal conductivity of the medium constant or variable?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free